No abstract available.
Esophageal pH Monitoring* ; Gastroesophageal Reflux*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Impedance-pH monitoring allows detailed characterization of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal activity associated with reflux. We assessed the characteristics of nocturnal reflux and esophageal activity preceding and following reflux. METHODS: Impedance-pH tracings from 11 healthy subjects and 76 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease off acid-suppressive therapy were analyzed. Characteristics of nocturnal supine reflux, time distribution and esophageal activity seen on impedance at 2 minute intervals preceding and following reflux were described. RESULTS: Patients had more nocturnal reflux events than healthy subjects (8 [4-12] vs 2 [1-5], P = 0.002), with lower proportion of weakly acidic reflux (57% [35-78] vs 80% [60-100], P = 0.044). Nocturnal reflux was mainly liquid (80%) and reached the proximal esophagus more often in patients (6% vs 0%, P = 0.047). Acid reflux predominated in the first 2 hours (66%) and weakly acidic reflux in the last 3 hours (70%) of the night. Most nocturnal reflux was preceded by aboral flows and cleared by short lasting volume clearance. In patients, prolonged chemical clearance was associated with less esophageal activity. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal weakly acidic reflux is as common as acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and predominates later in the night. Impedance-pH can predict prolonged chemical clearance after nocturnal acid reflux.
Electric Impedance ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophagus ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to quantify normal distal esophageal acid parameters in healthy Koreans. METHODS: Thirty healthy adults who were not on medication and were free from gastrointestinal symptoms were analyzed. Ambulatory esophageal acid (pH <4) exposure parameters were recorded at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. RESULTS: The 95th percentiles for reflux parameters assessed in the distal esophagus were as follows: percentage of total time with pH <4, 5.10%; percentage of upright time with pH <4, 7.88%; percentage of supine time with pH <4, 4.00%; number of reflux episodes, 62.7; number of reflux episodes with pH <4 for >5 minutes, 5.3; and the longest single acid-exposure episode, 21.3 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological gastroesophageal reflux occurs frequently in healthy Koreans. These data provide a reference range that could be utilized in studies involving Korean subjects.
Adult ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Esophagus ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Reference Values

BACKGROUND: Failed or hypotensive peristalsis, two of the diagnostic criteria for NEMD, correlates with impaired anterograde propulsion and retrograde escape of esophageal contents. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal acid clearance (EAC) in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). METHODS: Of 252 patients performing esophageal manometry and ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, 51 patients with normal motility and acid reflux and 40 patients with IEM and acid reflux were included. RESULTS: The amplitude of peristaltic waves in the proximal and distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower significantly in patients with IEM than those with normal motility. Percentage of time of pH<4 in total, upright, and supine period and number of reflux episodes was not different in both. Supine EAC was significantly increased in patients with IEM when compared to those with normal motility. Upright EAC was not different in both. CONCLUSION: We concluded supine EAC is increased in patients with IEM. Since IEM is frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a more intensive therapy must be needed. We propose IEM can be as a specific entity of primary esophageal motility disorder, especially in patients with GERD.
Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Esophagus ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Manometry ; Peristalsis ; United Nations

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Available data about reflux patterns and symptom determinants in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) subtypes off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are lacking. We aimed to evaluate reflux patterns and determinants of symptom perception in patients with GERD off PPI therapy by impedance-pH monitoring. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the impedance-pH data in patients diagnosed as GERD based on results of impedance-pH monitoring, endoscopy and/or typical symptoms. The characteristics of acid and weakly acidic reflux were evaluated. Symptomatic and asymptomatic reflux were compared according to GERD subtypes and individual symptoms. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (22 males, mean age 46 years) were diagnosed as GERD (17 erosive reflux disease, 9 pH(+) non-erosive reflux disease [NERD], 9 hypersensitive esophagus and 7 symptomatic NERD). A total of 1,725 reflux episodes were detected (855 acid [50%], 857 weakly acidic [50%] and 13 weakly alkaline reflux [< 1%]). Acid reflux was more frequently symptomatic and bolus clearance was longer compared with weakly acidic reflux. In terms of globus, weakly acidic reflux was more symptomatic. Symptomatic reflux was more frequently acid and mixed reflux; these associations were more pronounced in erosive reflux disease and symptomatic NERD. The perception of regurgitation was related to acid reflux, while that of globus was more related to weakly acidic reflux. CONCLUSIONS: In patients not taking PPI, acid reflux was more frequently symptomatic and had longer bolus clearance. Symptomatic reflux was more frequently acid and mixed type; however, weakly acidic reflux was associated more with globus. These data suggest a role for impedance-pH data in the evaluation of globus.
Electric Impedance ; Endoscopy ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophagus ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Male ; Proton Pumps ; Protons ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of 24 hour pH monitoring in the pediatric patients with recurrent vomiting or regurgitation. METHODS: We performed 24 hour pH monitoring on 87 pediatric patients with recurrent vomiting or regurgitation using GastrograpH with glass electrode. The pathologic GER was determined by the reflux index (RI). RIs>10% were considered positive in patients <1 year of age, whereas RIs of <5% were positive in other age groups. We evaluated the mean and standard deviation of the reflux parameters between physiologic and pathologic GER groups, and also compared the reflux indices of each group with respect to time zones of the day. RESULTS: Pathologic GER was found in 32 of 87 patients (36.8%), and the age incidence included 32.5% in infants <6 months old, 13.3% in infants aged 6 months-1 year old, 61.5% in children aged 1~2 years old, 14.3% in children aged 2~3 years old and 66.7% in children >3 years old. In physiologic GER patients, the RI was 3.7+/-2.9% for the patients <1 year old (group A), and 1.8+/-1.5% for those > or =1 year old (group B) which was statistically significant between the 2 age groups (p=0.02). The number of long refluxes more than 5 minutes was significantly increased (p=0.03) in group A (1.7+/-1.9) than in group B (0.8+/-1.0). The duration of the longest reflux was significantly longer (p=0.007) in group A (604+/-551 sec) than in group B (275+/-296 sec). In pathologic GER patients, the RI was 17.7+/-11.6% for the patients <1 year old and 7.8+/-2.9 for those > or =1 year old. The number of long refluxes of more than 5 minutes were 8.9+/-4.6 and 3.2+/-1.8, and the duration of the longest reflux were 1955+/-2190 sec and 1093+/-706 sec for each age group. In both physiologic and pathologic GER patients, there was no significant difference of RI among the time zones of the day. CONCLUSION: Pathologic GER was found in 36.8% of patients. There was significant difference of RI between those <1 year old and those > or =1 year old in physiologic GER patients. There was no significant difference of RI among the time zones of the day in both pathologic and physiologic groups. In our study, the frequency of pathplogic GER was too much higher in age group of 1~2 years old (61.5%) than in group of 6 months-1 year old (13.3%), which means that further study is needed to determine the pathologic criteria of RI (Vandenplas criteria is >5%) in the age group of 1~2 years old.
Child* ; Electrodes ; Esophageal pH Monitoring* ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Glass ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Incidence ; Infant ; Vomiting*

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of pH monitoring at two levels, hypopharynx and esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: 29 patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux were classified into two groups: Group I had recurrent respiratory symptoms and Group II had not recurrent respiratory symptoms. The ambulatory pH monitoring was performed at the hypopharynx and the esophagus simultaneously with two channel catheter for 18~24 hr. The pathological reflux was defined when the percent of time that pH was below 4.0 exceeding the 95th percentile of normal value. Hypopharyngeal reflux was defined as the pharyngeal pH drops below 4. RESULTS: 39 patients were performed pH monitoring at the level of hypopharynx and esophagus for 24 hours. Among 7 patients with chronic respiratory symptom, 6 patients (85.7%) have pathological esophageal reflux. Among 32 patients without chronic respiratory symptom, 23 patients (71.8%) have pathological esophageal reflux. Thus 29 out of 39 patients (74%) have pathological esophageal reflux. In the Group I, all parameters except the longest episode showed significant differences between hypopharyngeal and esophageal pH monitoring. None of parameters showed significant differences between group I and II in the pharyngeal pH monitoring. CONCLUSION: Regardless of presence of respiratory symptoms, the pH monitoring at the pharyngeal level in patients with gastroesophageal reflux did not showed any differences compared with the esophageal pH monitoring. Therefore we may reconsider the usefulness of hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with chronic respiratory symptoms.
Catheters ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophagus ; Gastroesophageal Reflux* ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration* ; Hypopharynx ; Reference Values

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common cause of chronic cough. Nevertheless the incidence of GERD is low in Korea. We evaluated the necessity of tests for GERD as a cause of chronic cough and treatment responses to proton pump inhibitors. METHODS: Patients with cough for more than three weeks were enrolled. Patients who were diagnosed as bronchial asthma, eosinophilic bronchitis, and posterior nasal drip were differentiated. Twenty four hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring was performed in patients with chronic cough of unknown causes or gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Patients were diagnosed as GERD when DeMeester composite score was over 14.7 or symptom sensitivity index was over 10 percent. We prescribed proton pump inhibitors for patients diagnosed as GERD. RESULTS: Sixty seven of 531 patients supposedly needed 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring was performed in 34 patients and eight patients were diagnosed as GERD. Symptoms improved in 5 patients on taking omeprazole 20~40 mg/day single or combined with prokinetic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic cough, not many cases needed to take 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. The incidence of GERD, diagnosed by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, in chronic cough of unknown causes was low. The effect of omeprazole was similar to the previous reports.
Asthma ; Bronchitis ; Cough* ; Eosinophils ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Gastroesophageal Reflux* ; Humans ; Incidence* ; Korea ; Omeprazole ; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disease predominantly seen in the West but there is a rising trend in Asia. Ambulatory 24-hour catheter-based pH monitoring has been the de facto gold standard test for GERD that correlates symptoms with acid reflux episodes. However, drawbacks such as patients' discomfort, and catheter displacement render the test as cumbersome and error-prone. The Bravo pH wireless system is designed to be user-friendly and has an added advantage of prolonged pH monitoring. The system is comparable to the catheter-based pH monitoring system in terms of diagnostic yield and symptom-reflux association. Indications include evaluation of patients with refractory GERD symptoms and prior to anti-reflux surgery. Bravo utilizes a wireless pH-sensing capsule with a complete prepackaged system, and a data processing software. The capsule may be positioned indirectly using endoscopic or manometric landmarks or under direct endoscopic guidance. Optimal threshold cut-off values are yet to be standardized but based on available studies, for the Asian population, it may be recommended for total % time pH < 4 of 5.8 over 48 hours. Cost is a limitation but capsule placement is relatively safe although technical failures may be seen in small percentage of cases.
Asia ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Catheters ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Gastroesophageal Reflux* ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration*

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to show the clinical importance of each parameter of esophageal pH-metry regarding age distribution. Also, the study was done to compare the reliability of each parameter in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A retrospective study, based on hospital discharge registry, was conducted among 30 children who were given 24hr esophageal pH monitoring. The patients with GERD were divided into two groups i.e., group I, children under 12 months of age (24 patients), group II, children between 1-7 years of age (17 patients). We compared the clinical presentations between these two groups and analyzed each four parameters of 24hr pH monitoring. RESULTS: The study suggests that the parameter of 24hr pH monitoring with the highest effect on total score was reflux index common to both groups. In addition, comparing esophageal pH parameter, the number of the longest reflux episode according to body position, the upright positions were more associated with high total score in patients with GERD over 12 month of age. CONCLUSION: In interpretations of 24hr pH monitoring, taking each parameter and age into consideration is important. There is an inevitable overlap of data between normal and abnormal populations. Therefore, a further study with larger sample is required to establish the range of the physiologic and the pathologic GERD.
Age Distribution ; Child ; Esophageal pH Monitoring* ; Gastroesophageal Reflux* ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Retrospective Studies