1.Gastroesophageal Reflux in Ingants and Clinical Experience with 24-Hour Esophageal pH Monitoring.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1988;31(4):427-435
No abstract available.
Esophageal pH Monitoring*
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
2.Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux Revisited by Impedance-pH Monitoring.
Fernando FORNARI ; Kathleen BLONDEAU ; Veerle MERTENS ; Jan TACK ; Daniel SIFRIM
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2011;17(2):148-157
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Impedance-pH monitoring allows detailed characterization of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal activity associated with reflux. We assessed the characteristics of nocturnal reflux and esophageal activity preceding and following reflux. METHODS: Impedance-pH tracings from 11 healthy subjects and 76 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease off acid-suppressive therapy were analyzed. Characteristics of nocturnal supine reflux, time distribution and esophageal activity seen on impedance at 2 minute intervals preceding and following reflux were described. RESULTS: Patients had more nocturnal reflux events than healthy subjects (8 [4-12] vs 2 [1-5], P = 0.002), with lower proportion of weakly acidic reflux (57% [35-78] vs 80% [60-100], P = 0.044). Nocturnal reflux was mainly liquid (80%) and reached the proximal esophagus more often in patients (6% vs 0%, P = 0.047). Acid reflux predominated in the first 2 hours (66%) and weakly acidic reflux in the last 3 hours (70%) of the night. Most nocturnal reflux was preceded by aboral flows and cleared by short lasting volume clearance. In patients, prolonged chemical clearance was associated with less esophageal activity. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal weakly acidic reflux is as common as acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and predominates later in the night. Impedance-pH can predict prolonged chemical clearance after nocturnal acid reflux.
Electric Impedance
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Esophagus
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Humans
3.Normal 24-hour Ambulatory Esophageal pH Values in Koreans.
Won MOON ; Moo In PARK ; Gyung Mi KIM ; Kyu Jong KIM ; Seun Ja PARK ; Hyo Sung MUN ; Kang Dae LEE
Gut and Liver 2008;2(1):8-13
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to quantify normal distal esophageal acid parameters in healthy Koreans. METHODS: Thirty healthy adults who were not on medication and were free from gastrointestinal symptoms were analyzed. Ambulatory esophageal acid (pH <4) exposure parameters were recorded at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. RESULTS: The 95th percentiles for reflux parameters assessed in the distal esophagus were as follows: percentage of total time with pH <4, 5.10%; percentage of upright time with pH <4, 7.88%; percentage of supine time with pH <4, 4.00%; number of reflux episodes, 62.7; number of reflux episodes with pH <4 for >5 minutes, 5.3; and the longest single acid-exposure episode, 21.3 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological gastroesophageal reflux occurs frequently in healthy Koreans. These data provide a reference range that could be utilized in studies involving Korean subjects.
Adult
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Esophageal Sphincter, Lower
;
Esophagus
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Humans
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
;
Reference Values
4.Esophageal acid clearance in patients with ineffective esophageal motility.
Gwang Ha KIM ; Yong Mock BAE ; Eul Jo JEONG ; Jae Hyeon MOON ; Jin Kwang AN ; Jin Seon KIM ; Jeong HEO ; Dae Hwan KANG ; Geun Am SONG ; Mong CHO ; Ung Suk YANG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2002;63(4):386-393
BACKGROUND: Failed or hypotensive peristalsis, two of the diagnostic criteria for NEMD, correlates with impaired anterograde propulsion and retrograde escape of esophageal contents. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal acid clearance (EAC) in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). METHODS: Of 252 patients performing esophageal manometry and ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, 51 patients with normal motility and acid reflux and 40 patients with IEM and acid reflux were included. RESULTS: The amplitude of peristaltic waves in the proximal and distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower significantly in patients with IEM than those with normal motility. Percentage of time of pH<4 in total, upright, and supine period and number of reflux episodes was not different in both. Supine EAC was significantly increased in patients with IEM when compared to those with normal motility. Upright EAC was not different in both. CONCLUSION: We concluded supine EAC is increased in patients with IEM. Since IEM is frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a more intensive therapy must be needed. We propose IEM can be as a specific entity of primary esophageal motility disorder, especially in patients with GERD.
Esophageal Motility Disorders
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Esophageal Sphincter, Lower
;
Esophagus
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Humans
;
Manometry
;
Peristalsis
;
United Nations
5.Incidence of Esophagitis in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).
Yong Ho NAH ; Myeong Kyu JANG ; Jae Kyu RYU ; Seung Ryel SONG
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1994;14(2):145-150
The exact incidence of esophagitis in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains poorly understood in Korea. To determine incidence of esophagitis in GERD, from August 1988 to July 1993, endoscopy, esophageal manometry with Bernstein test, and ambulatory 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring were carried out in a group of 349 patients with symptoms of heartburn or noncardiac chest pain. Based on these studies, 151(40%) patients had some degree of GERD and pstients were categorized as having: pathologic reflux, 98 patients; symptomatic reflux, 42 patients; and sensitive mucosal reflux, 11 patients. Among 151 patients with GERD, 27 patients(18%) had some degree of esophagitis. In conclusion, 40% of patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD have GERD. GERD is divided into subgroups; pathologic reflux, symptomatic reflux, and mucosal sensitive reflux. Less than 20% of GERD have esophagitis or esophageal mucosal injury and these low incidence of mucosal injury in Korean may be due to increased esophageal mucosal resistance.
Chest Pain
;
Endoscopy
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Esophagitis*
;
Esophagitis, Peptic
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
;
Heartburn
;
Humans
;
Incidence*
;
Korea
;
Manometry
6.How to Interpret Ambulatory 24 hr Esophageal pH Monitoring.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2010;16(2):207-210
Newer developing techniques for esophageal functional testing such as wireless pH capsule monitoring and esophageal impedance testing are currently available. However, ambulatory 24 hr esophageal pH monitoring is still widely used and provides quantitative data on esophageal acid exposure and the ability to correlate symptoms with acid exposure events. To properly analyze the result of pH monitoring, it is recommended to interpret in the order presented: visual inspection, computer calculation and symptom correlation.
Electric Impedance
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
;
Reference Values
7.The Eleven Years' Experience with Fundoplication in Infants and Children.
Seon Tai KIM ; Cheol Koo LEE ; Hea Eun KIM ; Jeong Meen SEO ; Suk Koo LEE
Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons 2008;14(1):27-36
Fundoplication is a common surgical procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Recently the procedure has been performed with increased frequency laparoscopically. The aim of this study is to review our 11 years experience with fundoplication in infants and children. From October 1994 to December 2005, 59 fundoplications in 55 patients were performed at Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center. Medical records and laboratory results of these children were retrospectively reviewed for sex, age, symptoms and signs, coexisting disease, diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and length of operative time. Open fundoplication was performed in 41 cases and laparoscopic fundoplication in 18 cases. Simultaneous gastrostomy was done in 27 cases. Recurrent GERD symptom occurred in four patients (7.2 %) within 2 years after first fundoplication and all 4 patients had re-do fundoplication. There were no intra- and immediate post-operative complications. Gastrointesitnal symptoms were the most common indication for fundoplication in neurologically normal patients. The most frequent diagnostic studies were upper gastrointestinal series (76.3 %) and 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring (78.2 %). Fundoplication had been increased since 2004 and mostly done laparoscopically. In conclusion, our 11 years' practice of open and laparoscopic fundoplication indicates that both approaches are safe and effective in the treatment of GERD for infants and children.
Child
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Fundoplication
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Gastrostomy
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Medical Records
;
Operative Time
;
Retrospective Studies
8.Foods Inducing Typical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms in Korea.
Jung Wan CHOE ; Moon Kyung JOO ; Hyo Jung KIM ; Beom Jae LEE ; Ji Hoon KIM ; Jong Eun YEON ; Jong Jae PARK ; Jae Seon KIM ; Kwan Soo BYUN ; Young Tae BAK
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2017;23(3):363-369
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several specific foods are known to precipitate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and GERD patients are usually advised to avoid such foods. However, foods consumed daily are quite variable according to regions, cultures, etc. This study was done to elucidate the food items which induce typical GERD symptoms in Korean patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six Korean patients with weekly typical GERD symptoms were asked to mark all food items that induced typical GERD symptoms from a list containing 152 typical foods consumed daily in Korea. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy followed by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. The definition of “GERD” was if either of the 2 studies revealed evidence of GERD, and “possible GERD” if both studies were negative. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six cases (51 GERD and 75 possible GERD) were enrolled. In 19 (37.3%) of 51 GERD cases and in 17 (22.7%) of 75 possible GERD cases, foods inducing typical GERD symptoms were identified. In the GERD group (n = 19), frequent symptom-inducers were hot spicy stews, rice cakes, ramen noodles, fried foods, and topokki. In the possible GERD group (n = 17), frequent symptom-inducers were hot spicy stews, fried foods, doughnuts, breads, ramen noodles, coffee, pizza, topokki, rice cakes, champon noodles, and hotdogs. CONCLUSIONS: In one-third of GERD patients, foods inducing typical symptoms were identified. Hot spicy stews, rice cakes, ramen noodles, fried foods, and topokki were the foods frequently inducing typical symptoms in Korea. The list of foods frequently inducing typical GERD symptoms needs to be modified based on their own local experiences.
Bread
;
Coffee
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
;
Humans
;
Korea*
;
Symptom Assessment
9.Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using the Bravo Capsule pH System.
Rona Marie A LAWENKO ; Yeong Yeh LEE
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2016;22(1):25-30
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disease predominantly seen in the West but there is a rising trend in Asia. Ambulatory 24-hour catheter-based pH monitoring has been the de facto gold standard test for GERD that correlates symptoms with acid reflux episodes. However, drawbacks such as patients' discomfort, and catheter displacement render the test as cumbersome and error-prone. The Bravo pH wireless system is designed to be user-friendly and has an added advantage of prolonged pH monitoring. The system is comparable to the catheter-based pH monitoring system in terms of diagnostic yield and symptom-reflux association. Indications include evaluation of patients with refractory GERD symptoms and prior to anti-reflux surgery. Bravo utilizes a wireless pH-sensing capsule with a complete prepackaged system, and a data processing software. The capsule may be positioned indirectly using endoscopic or manometric landmarks or under direct endoscopic guidance. Optimal threshold cut-off values are yet to be standardized but based on available studies, for the Asian population, it may be recommended for total % time pH < 4 of 5.8 over 48 hours. Cost is a limitation but capsule placement is relatively safe although technical failures may be seen in small percentage of cases.
Asia
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Catheters
;
Esophageal pH Monitoring
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
;
Humans
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration*
10.Clinical Significance of Dual-probe Esophageal pH Monitoring in Pathological Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease with Recurrent Respiratory Symptoms.
Yun Chang CHOI ; Kyung Rye MOON
Korean Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2003;6(1):17-23
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine clinical significance of dual-probe esophageal pH monitoring and to compare four pH monitoring parameters between proximal and distal esophagus in pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease with recurrent respiratory symptoms. METHODS: Among the thirty-four patients who were performed 24 hr pH monitoring, seventeen patients with pathological distal reflux were classified into two groups: Group I (n:12) had recurrent respiratory symptoms and Group II (n:5) hadn't recurrent respiratory symptoms. The ambulatory dual-probe esophageal pH monitoring was performed for 18~24 hr. A pathologic GER was defined when reflux index (percent of the investigation time a pH<4) exceeded the 95th percentile of normal value. RESULTS: Among the sixteen patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms, twelve patients (75%) have pathological distal reflux. Whereas among the eighteen patients without recurrent respiratory symptom, five patients (28%) have pathological distal reflux. In the Group I, the significant differences between proximal and distal esophageal pH recordings persisted for all parameters, but didn't persist in group II except for longest episode. Comparing esophageal pH four parameters between group I and group II at the proximal esophageal site, all parameters didn't show statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Regardless of respiratory symptoms, patients with pathological distal reflux didn't show statistically significant differences in the all parameters at the proximal esophageal site. Therefore we may reconsider usefulness of dual probe pH meter in patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms.
Esophageal pH Monitoring*
;
Esophagus
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
;
Humans
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
;
Reference Values