OBJECTIVETo investigate the influence of the local sensory abnormality in throat while the change of motility in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES), as well as the change of esophageal body in pharyngeal paraesthesia.

METHODSFrom January 2014 to January 2015 there were sixty-four patients who had pharyngeal susceptible syndrome (PSS) but without confirmed organic disease were enrolled as the PSS group, forty healthy volunteers as the control group. High resolution manometry (HRM) was utilized to distinguish esophageal motility patterns of PSS, including the muscular tension of LES and UES, the integrity, adaptability, amplitude, speed and duration of esophageal peristalsis at 10 swallows.

RESULTSThe resting LES and UES pressures and the distal contractile integral (DCI) of esophagus in PSS group were lower than that in control group (P < 0.05). The esophageal peristalsis was decelerated and shortened in duration, and amplitude of contraction notably lower in PSS group compared with its counterpart (P < 0.05). The integrity of esophageal peristalsis was impaired in PSS with remarkable changes in motility patterns, involving ratio of major and minor interrupts, and synchronous contraction rate (P < 0.05). As for the time course from relaxation to the lowest pressure point of UES and time for restoration, no definite difference was noticed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The average peak pressure was similar in two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMuscle tension around the UES has no obvious change when pharyngeal paraesthesia occurred, but the reduction of esophageal motor function, clearance ability, anti-reflux gastroesophageal junction, causing the abnormal reflux which hurt the pharyngeal surface mucosa maybe one of the most important reasons leading to pharyngeal paresthesia.

Esophageal Motility Disorders ; diagnosis ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiopathology ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Manometry ; Muscle Tonus ; Paresthesia ; physiopathology ; Peristalsis ; Pharynx ; physiopathology ; Pressure

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the pressure changing characteristics of upper esophageal sphincter (UES), lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the esophagus kinetic characteristics of pharyngeal paraesthesia patients. METHOD: To take high resolution manometry in 44 cases of pharyngeal paraesthesia patients and 23 normal subjects separately. According to the RSI score,the 44 patients were divided into group A (the group without reflux, RSI < 13, n = 25) and group B (the group with reflux, RSI ≥ 13, n = 19). RESULT: The UES average resting pressure and average residual pressure of patients group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05); The UES average resting pressure and average residual pressure of group B were higher than group A (P < 0.05); The LES average resting pressure and average residual pressure of group B were lower than group A and the control group (P < 0.05); The comparison of LES average resting pressure and average residual pressure between group A and the control group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The esophagus DCI of group B was lower than that of group A and control group (P < 0.05). The esophagus DCI comparison between group A and control group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION The pharyngeal paresthesia symptoms of'patients was associated with the increasing of UES pressure. The pharyngeal paresthesia symptoms of group with reflux was related to low pressure of LES and high pressure of UES. The last part of esophagus of group with reflux had obstacles in powers, which weaken the peristalsis and declined the ability to clear the bolus and gastric reflux material.
Case-Control Studies ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiopathology ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper ; physiopathology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Manometry ; Paresthesia ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Peristalsis ; Pharynx ; physiopathology ; Pressure

No abstract available.
Adenocarcinoma/*complications/diagnosis ; Aged ; Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis/*etiology/physiopathology ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper/physiopathology ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/*complications/diagnosis ; Male ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed