OBJECTIVETo investigate the influence of the local sensory abnormality in throat while the change of motility in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES), as well as the change of esophageal body in pharyngeal paraesthesia.

METHODSFrom January 2014 to January 2015 there were sixty-four patients who had pharyngeal susceptible syndrome (PSS) but without confirmed organic disease were enrolled as the PSS group, forty healthy volunteers as the control group. High resolution manometry (HRM) was utilized to distinguish esophageal motility patterns of PSS, including the muscular tension of LES and UES, the integrity, adaptability, amplitude, speed and duration of esophageal peristalsis at 10 swallows.

RESULTSThe resting LES and UES pressures and the distal contractile integral (DCI) of esophagus in PSS group were lower than that in control group (P < 0.05). The esophageal peristalsis was decelerated and shortened in duration, and amplitude of contraction notably lower in PSS group compared with its counterpart (P < 0.05). The integrity of esophageal peristalsis was impaired in PSS with remarkable changes in motility patterns, involving ratio of major and minor interrupts, and synchronous contraction rate (P < 0.05). As for the time course from relaxation to the lowest pressure point of UES and time for restoration, no definite difference was noticed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The average peak pressure was similar in two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMuscle tension around the UES has no obvious change when pharyngeal paraesthesia occurred, but the reduction of esophageal motor function, clearance ability, anti-reflux gastroesophageal junction, causing the abnormal reflux which hurt the pharyngeal surface mucosa maybe one of the most important reasons leading to pharyngeal paresthesia.

Esophageal Motility Disorders ; diagnosis ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiopathology ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Manometry ; Muscle Tonus ; Paresthesia ; physiopathology ; Peristalsis ; Pharynx ; physiopathology ; Pressure

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the pressure changing characteristics of upper esophageal sphincter (UES), lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the esophagus kinetic characteristics of pharyngeal paraesthesia patients. METHOD: To take high resolution manometry in 44 cases of pharyngeal paraesthesia patients and 23 normal subjects separately. According to the RSI score,the 44 patients were divided into group A (the group without reflux, RSI < 13, n = 25) and group B (the group with reflux, RSI ≥ 13, n = 19). RESULT: The UES average resting pressure and average residual pressure of patients group were higher than the control group (P < 0.05); The UES average resting pressure and average residual pressure of group B were higher than group A (P < 0.05); The LES average resting pressure and average residual pressure of group B were lower than group A and the control group (P < 0.05); The comparison of LES average resting pressure and average residual pressure between group A and the control group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The esophagus DCI of group B was lower than that of group A and control group (P < 0.05). The esophagus DCI comparison between group A and control group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION The pharyngeal paresthesia symptoms of'patients was associated with the increasing of UES pressure. The pharyngeal paresthesia symptoms of group with reflux was related to low pressure of LES and high pressure of UES. The last part of esophagus of group with reflux had obstacles in powers, which weaken the peristalsis and declined the ability to clear the bolus and gastric reflux material.
Case-Control Studies ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiopathology ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper ; physiopathology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Manometry ; Paresthesia ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Peristalsis ; Pharynx ; physiopathology ; Pressure

Transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR) is defined as LES relaxation without a swallow. TLESRs are observed in both of the normal individuals and the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). However, TLESR is widely considered as the major mechanism of the GERD. The new equipments such as high resolution manometry and impedance pH study is helped to understand of TLESR and the related esophageal motor activities. The strong longitudinal muscle contraction was observed during development of TLESR. Most of TLESRs are terminated by TLESR related motor events such as primary peristalsis and secondary contractions. The majority of TLESRs are associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) contraction is mainly associated with liquid reflux during recumbent position and UES relaxation predominantly related with air reflux during upright position. The frequency of TLESR in GERD patients seems to be not different compared to normal individuals, but the refluxate of GERD patients tend to be more acidic during TLESR.
Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/*physiology ; Esophagogastric Junction/physiology ; Esophagus/*physiology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/*physiopathology ; Humans ; Muscle Relaxation/physiology

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that is commonly misdiagnosed initially as gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with achalasia often complain of dysphagia with solids and liquids but may focus on regurgitation as the primary symptom, leading to initial misdiagnosis. Diagnostic tests for achalasia include esophageal motility testing, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and barium swallow. These tests play a complimentary role in establishing the diagnosis of suspected achalasia. High-resolution manometry has now identified three subtypes of achalasia, with therapeutic implications. Pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy are the only definitive treatment options for patients with achalasia who can undergo surgery. Botulinum toxin injection into the lower esophageal sphincter should be reserved for those who cannot undergo definitive therapy. Close follow-up is paramount because many patients will have a recurrence of symptoms and require repeat treatment.
Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage ; Deglutition Disorders/etiology ; Diagnostic Errors ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophageal Achalasia/*diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology/therapy ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Esophagus/physiopathology/surgery ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis ; Humans ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Manometry ; Neurotransmitter Agents/administration & dosage ; Recurrence

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia cardia (AC).
 METHODS: A total of 62 patients with AC were enrolled and treated with POEM in the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from April 2012 to October 2014. The symptoms and complications were retrospectively analyzed.
 RESULTS: The ages of patients, including 32 males and 30 females, were 14-68 (43.2±5.6) years old. Eckardt scores were 4-6 or ≥7 for 25 patients or 37 patients (including 20 patients were at a score of 12). Thirteen patients suffered balloon expansion for 2-3 times. Sixty-one patients had completed POEM treatment, 1 patient were given Heller surgery instead of POEM because of extensive submucosal adhesion during POEM. The operative time for POEM was (60.8±15.1) min. Fourteen patients had mild subcutaneous emphysema. Among them, 5 suffered pneumoperitoneum and felt better after abdominal puncture exhaust; 2 patients suffered bronchospasm hypoxemia and were relieved after treatment by positive pressure oxygen for 1 h. The hospital stay was (4.3±1.2) d. The postoperative follow-up period was (11.4±5.4) months. Swallowing obstruction, vomiting and chest pain in patients was relieved at different degrees. The treatment effective rate was 100%. 
 CONCLUSION POEM is a safe, effective and minimally invasive approach for AC.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cardia ; physiopathology ; Endoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Esophageal Achalasia ; surgery ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of standard meal and fat meal distending the fundus on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) and esophageal motility and to explore the mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODSEight patients with GERD (3 male, 5 female; median age: 43.5 ys) were enrolled in the study. All received 2 times of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring simultaneously for 30 min during fasting and 2 h after two different test-meals, including standard meal (SM) and fat meal (FM) on separate day at least 1 week apart.

RESULTSThe frequency of TLESR significantly increased after 2 test-meals (P < 0.05). There were no significant difference in the frequency and duration of TLESR between SM group and FM group 1 h after meal (P > 0.05). However, the frequency of TLESR in FM group 2 h after meal was more than that in SM group and during fasting (P < 0.05). Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) significantly decreased in FM group than in SM group (P < 0.05). The contractive amplitude of post lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and the contractive amplitude of the distal esophagus had no difference after FM and SM. Acid reflux episodes and duration of pH < 4 were larger after FM than after SM (P < 0.05). A total of 50.2% of GER occurred during decreased LESP and 37.8% during TLESR after FM, while 61.7% of GER occurred during TLESR after SM.

CONCLUSIONSBoth the SM and FM can increase the frequency of TLESR in patients with GERD. Decreased LESP and increased frequency of TLESR after FM are the major mechanism of GER, while reflux after SM may attribute to the increased frequency of TLESR.

Adult ; Dietary Fats ; administration & dosage ; Energy Intake ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; physiopathology ; Esophagus ; physiopathology ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; etiology ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Male ; Manometry ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Relaxation ; Pressure

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated the risk factors for short-term recurrence and analyzed the correlation between subjective clinical symtoms and objective radiological findings in patients with achalasia undergoing pneumatic balloon dilatation. METHODS: Twenty patients who were treated by pneumatic balloon dilatation were enrolled. We compared prospectively various indices before and after the treatment as follows: 1) Eckardt symptom score and dysphagia grade, 2) The ratio of the maximal width in mid-esophageal lumen to the minimal width in distal esophagus around lower esophageal sphincter, and 3) the percentage of maximum activity retained in the esophagus at 30 seconds and T in esophageal scan two days after the treatment. RESULTS: 1) Clinical indices and radiologic indices significantly improved after pneumatic dilatation. 2) There was no significant correlation between the clinical indices and the radiologic indices before and after the treatment. 3) The difference percentage of clinical indices did not show significant correlation with the difference percentage of the radiologic indices. 4) Compared to the group above 20% in the difference percentage of 30 second residual fraction, the one below 20% had a four-fold risk in short-term recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical symptoms and radiologic indices significantly improve after pneumatic dilatation but have no significant correlation to each other. The group below 20% in the difference percentage of 30 second residual fraction has a high risk of recurrence and may need careful examination and early repeated pneumatic dilation.
Adolescent ; Adult ; *Balloon Dilatation ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis/*radiography/*therapy ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors