Atrial Fibrillation ; Catheter Ablation ; Esophageal Diseases ; Esophageal Perforation/etiology* ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome ; Ulcer

Pharyngoesophageal perforation from an exploding bottle is an extremely rare injury. To date, twenty-four cases have been documented in English literature. In this study, we reported two additional cases of pharyngoesophageal perforation by a bottle exploding in the mouth. Explosion of the bottle occurred when the patients removed the cap of a home-made wine bottle with their teeth, which resulted in pharyngoesophageal perforation. The patients were managed by conservative treatment and operative repair, respectively. Both patients had an uneventful recovery. Possible mechanisms and preventive measures are discussed in this study, along with a review of the literature.
Pharynx/*injuries ; Male ; Humans ; Female ; Explosions ; Esophageal Perforation/*etiology ; Barotrauma/*etiology ; Aged

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of severe complications induced by esophageal foreign bodies.

METHODSThe clinical data of 44 patients with severe complications of esophageal foreign bodies treated from July 2004 to July 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The type of complications was recorded.

RESULTSThe ratio of severe complications in patients with esophageal foreign bodies was 9.05% (44/486). The most common type of foreign body was animal bone, with a total of 34 cases (77.3%); Onset of the disease were 2-40 days, mostly above 6 days, accounting for 61.4%. Severe complications of esophageal foreign bodies included 16 cases (36.3%) of simple esophageal perforation or combined with esophageal regional inflammation, 14 cases (31.8%) of cervical abscess, 7 cases (15.9%) of abscess around esophagus, 3 cases (6.8%) of mediastinal abscess, one case (2.3%) of cervical subcutaneous emphysema, one case of tracheoesophageal fistula, one case (2.3%) of aortic fracture, and one case (2.3%) of subclavian artery pseudoaneurysm. Among the 44 patients with severe complications, 40 patients (90.9%) were cured and 3 patients (6.8%) died. One case didn't receieve treatment.

CONCLUSIONSOccurrence of the severe complications induced by esophageal foreign bodies is closely related to the type of foreign bodies and time before presentation. Early diagnosis and prompt treatments for esophageal foreign bodies are crucial for preventing of severe complications.

Abscess ; etiology ; Esophageal Perforation ; etiology ; Foreign Bodies ; complications ; pathology ; Humans ; Neck ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Subcutaneous Emphysema ; etiology ; Tracheoesophageal Fistula ; etiology

Esophageal Perforation/etiology* ; Esophagus ; Foreign Bodies/complications* ; Humans ; Magnetic Phenomena ; Mediastinum

No abstract availble.
Esophageal Neoplasms/complications/pathology/*radiography ; Esophageal Perforation/etiology/*radiography/therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVE: Summarize the treatment skills of esophagus perforation caused by esophageal foreign bodies. METHOD: Retrospectively analyze the seven cases of esophagus foreign body perforation with various complications in our department. RESULT: Six cases recovered in 3 to 18 days after operation, on average 14.2 day, while one case recovered in 49 days by conservative method. CONCLUSION Foreign bodies removing, fistulae repairing, abscess incising, effusion rinsing, effective antibiotics administrating and support treatment are effective to treat esophagus perforation caused by esophageal foreign bodies. It will take a relative long time to be treated only by conservative way.
Adult ; Aged ; Esophageal Perforation ; diagnosis ; etiology ; therapy ; Esophagus ; Female ; Foreign Bodies ; complications ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies

A 68-yr-old man complaining of sudden, postprandial chest pain visited the emergency room. His symptom had been aggravated during the preceding two days. Upper gastrointestinal contrast study with gastrographin showed leakage of dye from the epiphrenic diverticulum in the lower third of the esophagus. The primary repair was urgently carried out. Upper gastrointestinal contrast study 14 days after operation revealed an esophageal leakage which was small and confined. The patient was managed with conservative treatments such as intravenous hyperali-mentation and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Forty-two days after the operation, a gastrographin swallow study showed the absence of leaks. This is the first report-ed case of a perforated epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum repaired by delayed primary repair in Korea.
Aged ; Diverticulum, Esophageal/complications/*diagnosis/*surgery ; Esophageal Perforation/*diagnosis/etiology/*surgery ; Esophagectomy/*methods ; Humans ; Male ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVECongenital esophageal stenosis owing to tracheobronchial remnants (TBR) is a rare condition. This study was conducted to understand the clinical features of TBR.

METHODThe data of the four cases with TBR admitted to our hospital and 76 patients identified from the literature were reviewed. The clinical manifestation, X-ray, endoscopy, biopsy and treatment were studied retrospectively.

RESULTOf the total of 80 cases, 45 were male, 33 were female, and for 2 cases the gender was unknown. Symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation developed at the age of 1-day to 12-month. Definitive treatment was carried out at the age of 1-month to 16-year. Twenty-seven patients had associated anomalies with esophageal atresia being the most prevalent. X-ray esophagography showed segmental stenosis at the distal third of the esophagus in all patients except three. An abrupt narrow segment at the lower esophagus with marked proximal dilatation was found in 32 cases. Esophagography of 12 cases showed distal esophageal stenosis with tapered narrowing. Esophagography of 20 cases showed flask-shaped shadow of distal esophageal stenosis and one patient showed linear projection of barium at the level of stenosis. Endoscopy found almost complete obstruction of the lower esophageal lumen without signs of the esophagitis or reflux. Esophagoscopic dilatation of the stenosis was attempted in 24 cases, but was ineffective, and 3 patients suffered esophageal perforation. Seventy-nine patients underwent resection of the stenotic segment. Histologic examination of the resected specimen showed cartilage, mucus glands, resembling bronchal tissue. Post-operative complication included anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic leakage, hiatal hernia, and gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSIONTBR should be suspected in patients who present with a typical history of dysphagia after ingestion of solid food. Esophagography and esophagoscopy are the essential means for diagnosis. TBR should be different from achalasia and should be diagnosed by biopsy. Operation is the only choice of treatment.

Anastomosis, Surgical ; Barium Sulfate ; Biopsy ; Child, Preschool ; Choristoma ; complications ; Dilatation ; Esophageal Atresia ; complications ; Esophageal Perforation ; etiology ; Esophageal Stenosis ; congenital ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Esophagoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tracheoesophageal Fistula ; etiology

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Esophageal perforation is a rare but often a life-threatening condition. However, the incidence and clinical features of esophageal perforation caused by ingested foreign body are unknown. This study investigated the incidence of esophageal perforation caused by ingested foreign body and evaluated the clinical features and outcome of patients with esophageal perforation. METHODS: Among a total of 196 adult patients with confirmed esophageal foreign body and complained of at least one of the related symptoms at the emergency department between January 2000 and July 2008, 18 patients with esophageal perforation due to esophageal foreign body ingestion were included in the study. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the electric medical records. RESULTS: The incidence of esophageal foreign body and esophageal perforation in adults was 19.4% (196/1,009) and 1.8% (18/1,009), respectively. Chest pain was the most common symptom and fishbone was the most common foreign body causing esophageal perforation. Mediastinitis or mediastinal abscess occurred in 13 patients (13/18, 72.2%). About half (8/18) of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit but there was no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of esophageal perforation in patients with foreign body ingestion was low but it increased up to 9.2% in patients with esophageal foreign body. However, prognosis was favorable with timely proper treatment. Chest pain can be an ominous sign indicating the presence of esophageal perforation in patients with esophageal foreign body.
Aged ; Chest Pain/etiology ; Emergency Medical Services ; Esophageal Perforation/*diagnosis/epidemiology/etiology ; Female ; Foreign Bodies/*complications ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical characteristics and therapies for esophageal perforation complicated with lethal massive hemorrhage caused by esophageal foreign body. METHOD: To retrospective analysis the treatment of massive hemorrhage at the carotid artery or aorta caused by esophageal foreign body in forty seven patients, Foreign body characters, surgical approaches, and postsurgical management were summarized. RESULT: Among 24 patients with cervical esophageal foreign body, the object was removed either by esophagoscopy or through lateral cervical incision. After controlling carotid artery hemorrhage and repairing Fistula of artery from cervical incision, 19 patients survived. For the 23 patients with thoracic esophageal foreign body accompanied with aorta hemorrhea, thoracotomy was performed to remove the foreign body and repair the aortic fistula. Only 3 of these 23 patients recovered from the emergent surgery, other 20 patients died. CONCLUSION For the patients with esophageal foreign body inducing large vessel impingement, the most reliable therapeutic method is surgical repairing of arterial perforation and extraction of the foreign body via cervical or thoracic incision. Carotid ligation should be considered in patients with recurrent carotid hemorrhage. For the patient with mediastinitis, esophageal exclusion is recommended to prevent infection and to promote healing of aortic perforation after aortic fistula repairing.
Adult ; Esophageal Perforation ; etiology ; surgery ; Esophagus ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Foreign Bodies ; complications ; Hemorrhage ; etiology ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies