1.Incidence and Clinical Features of Esophageal Perforation Caused by Ingested Foreign Body.
Ji Eun KIM ; Seung Mok RYOO ; Youn Jung KIM ; Jong Seung LEE ; Shin AHN ; Dong Woo SEO ; Chang Hwan SOHN ; Jeong Min RYU ; Won Young KIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2015;66(5):255-260
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Esophageal perforation is a rare but often a life-threatening condition. However, the incidence and clinical features of esophageal perforation caused by ingested foreign body are unknown. This study investigated the incidence of esophageal perforation caused by ingested foreign body and evaluated the clinical features and outcome of patients with esophageal perforation. METHODS: Among a total of 196 adult patients with confirmed esophageal foreign body and complained of at least one of the related symptoms at the emergency department between January 2000 and July 2008, 18 patients with esophageal perforation due to esophageal foreign body ingestion were included in the study. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the electric medical records. RESULTS: The incidence of esophageal foreign body and esophageal perforation in adults was 19.4% (196/1,009) and 1.8% (18/1,009), respectively. Chest pain was the most common symptom and fishbone was the most common foreign body causing esophageal perforation. Mediastinitis or mediastinal abscess occurred in 13 patients (13/18, 72.2%). About half (8/18) of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit but there was no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of esophageal perforation in patients with foreign body ingestion was low but it increased up to 9.2% in patients with esophageal foreign body. However, prognosis was favorable with timely proper treatment. Chest pain can be an ominous sign indicating the presence of esophageal perforation in patients with esophageal foreign body.
Aged
;
Chest Pain/etiology
;
Emergency Medical Services
;
Esophageal Perforation/*diagnosis/epidemiology/etiology
;
Female
;
Foreign Bodies/*complications
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Congenital esophageal stenosis owing to ectopic tracheobronchial remnants: report of four cases and review of the literature.
Xue-mei ZHONG ; Yan-ling ZHANG ; Long LI
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics 2012;50(8):571-574
OBJECTIVECongenital esophageal stenosis owing to tracheobronchial remnants (TBR) is a rare condition. This study was conducted to understand the clinical features of TBR.
METHODThe data of the four cases with TBR admitted to our hospital and 76 patients identified from the literature were reviewed. The clinical manifestation, X-ray, endoscopy, biopsy and treatment were studied retrospectively.
RESULTOf the total of 80 cases, 45 were male, 33 were female, and for 2 cases the gender was unknown. Symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation developed at the age of 1-day to 12-month. Definitive treatment was carried out at the age of 1-month to 16-year. Twenty-seven patients had associated anomalies with esophageal atresia being the most prevalent. X-ray esophagography showed segmental stenosis at the distal third of the esophagus in all patients except three. An abrupt narrow segment at the lower esophagus with marked proximal dilatation was found in 32 cases. Esophagography of 12 cases showed distal esophageal stenosis with tapered narrowing. Esophagography of 20 cases showed flask-shaped shadow of distal esophageal stenosis and one patient showed linear projection of barium at the level of stenosis. Endoscopy found almost complete obstruction of the lower esophageal lumen without signs of the esophagitis or reflux. Esophagoscopic dilatation of the stenosis was attempted in 24 cases, but was ineffective, and 3 patients suffered esophageal perforation. Seventy-nine patients underwent resection of the stenotic segment. Histologic examination of the resected specimen showed cartilage, mucus glands, resembling bronchal tissue. Post-operative complication included anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic leakage, hiatal hernia, and gastroesophageal reflux.
CONCLUSIONTBR should be suspected in patients who present with a typical history of dysphagia after ingestion of solid food. Esophagography and esophagoscopy are the essential means for diagnosis. TBR should be different from achalasia and should be diagnosed by biopsy. Operation is the only choice of treatment.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; Barium Sulfate ; Biopsy ; Child, Preschool ; Choristoma ; complications ; Dilatation ; Esophageal Atresia ; complications ; Esophageal Perforation ; etiology ; Esophageal Stenosis ; congenital ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery ; Esophagoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tracheoesophageal Fistula ; etiology