The objective of this study was to review the natural history of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) with specific emphasis on clinical features, response to treatment and survival. The records of all patients (n=34) with EPSCC treated at Yeungnam University Medical Center and Catholic University of Daegu Medical Center between 1998 and 2005 were retrieved and reviewed. The primary sites of tumor were the esophagus and thymus in 6 patients (17.6%) each, pancreas and stomach in 5 patients each (14.7%); other sites included were the cervix, abdominal lymph nodes, abdominal wall, bladder, colon, maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, ovary, parotid gland and liver. Twenty three patients out of 34 had limited disease. The median survival of all patients was 14 months. Independent prognostic factors included stage and primary tumor location. The prognosis for the patients with extensive disease and in the gastrointestinal group was unfavorable. EPSCC is a non homogeneous disease entity. As a result of its frequent recurrence, multimodal therapy has a better outcome even in cases of limited disease. Combination chemotherapy plays a central role for treatment of extensive disease in EPSCC. Further multicenter studies are now needed to determine more details regarding disease sub-class and optimal treatment modality.
Thymus Neoplasms/mortality/therapy ; Survival Rate ; Stomach Neoplasms/mortality/therapy ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality/therapy ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Humans ; Female ; Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality/therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Carcinoma, Small Cell/mortality/*therapy ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aged ; Adult

BACKGROUNDThe effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NCRT followed by surgery (NCRTS) with surgery alone (SA) for EC.

METHODSThe PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to August 2015 for all the published studies that investigated EC patients receiving either NCRTS or SA, and the reference lists were also manually examined for the eligible studies. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI s) as effective size was determined to assess the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates (SRs), postoperative morbidity, and postoperative mortality. Heterogeneity was determined using the Q-test. The Begg's test and Egger's test were used for assessing any potential publication bias.

RESULTSOf 1120 identified studies, 16 eligible studies were included in this analysis (involving 2549 patients). Overall, the pooled results suggested that NCRTS was associated with significantly improved 1-year (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), 3-year (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39), and 5-year (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18-1.56) SRs. However, the results also indicated that NCRTS had no or little effect on postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.82-1.05) and postoperative mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.56-2.44).

CONCLUSIONSCompared with SA, NCRTS can increase 1-, 3-, and 5-year SRs in patients with EC.

Chemoradiotherapy ; methods ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; methods ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the benefits of post-stenting radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for unresectable esophageal carcinoma.

METHODSFifty-three patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups: patients in group A (n = 27) were treated with stenting alone, and those in group B (n = 26) were treated with stenting followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Comparison was made by assessing their survival time, quality of life (QOL), degree of dysphagia, and stenting-related morbidity, respectively.

RESULTSThere was no statistically significant improvement in dysphagia and QOL between the two groups. Although there was no difference in the frequency of stenting-related complications, re-stenosis occurred much less frequently in group B patients (P = 0.007). The mean survival time of patients was 245 +/- 41 days and 262 +/- 43 days in group A and group B, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.813).

CONCLUSIONBesides decreased recurrence of stenosis, post-stenting radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy does not provide additional benefits for survival.

Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Stents

Esophageal cancer is still a virulent disease that leads to death. Surgery has been regarded as the treatment of choice in patients suffering this type of cancer and recent improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have significantly increased the resection rate and reduced the operative mortality. Nevertheless, long-term survival rates remain poor. The poor prognosis reflects the fact that the disease is usually advanced at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has recently been developed as a treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients. Chemoradiation therapy is based on the concept of the biochemical modulation effects and radiosensitizing effects of the chemotherapeutic agents. How ever, the optimal choice of chemotherapeutic agents and their doses, as well as the chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens have not been precisely established. We report a case of concurrent chemoradiation protocol by which a complete response was achieved. 5-FU (1,800 mg/body/day) was continuously infused over 24 hours and cisplatin (45 mg/ body/day) was administered 1 hour before radiotherapy for 3 days. This chemotherapy course was repeated once more after 4 weeks. The radiotherapy (180 cGy/day) was scheduled for 5 consecutive days, followed by a 2-day withdrawal, and a total dose of 5,940 cGy within 7 weeks. Our concurrent chemoradiation therapy is deemed rational, effective and safe because an endoscopically and pathologically complete response was achieved 1 year after chemoradiation therapy without any severe side effects. Therefore, we believe that our concurrent chemoradiation therapy can be recommended as a treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients.
Cisplatin ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms* ; Fluorouracil ; Humans ; Mortality ; Prognosis ; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents ; Radiotherapy ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUNDThe effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRTS) in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma remains controversial. We performed a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis.

METHODSElectronic databases were used to identify published studies between January 1992 and April 2012. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was utilized to estimate the strength of the association between CRTS and surgery alone (SA) survival of the resectable esophageal carcinoma patients. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed in the present study.

RESULTSThe final analysis of 2755 resectable esophageal carcinoma cases from 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are presented. Compared to the SA group, the 1, 3- and 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in the CRTS group (all P < 0.05); the 3- and 5-year survival rates for the Eastern patients, Western patients, patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy, patients with squamous cell carcinoma, patients undergoing High-dose radiotherapy (≥ 40 Gy), and patients given either "cisplatin + Fluorouracil" or "cisplatin + paclitaxel" chemotherapy were significantly higher in the CRTS group (all P < 0.05). There were no statistical significances in the 3- and 5-year survival rates for patients undergoing sequential chemoradiotherapy or patients with adenocarcinoma between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Compared to the RCTS group, the surgery rate in the SA group was higher (P < 0.05), while the CRTS group had significantly higher radical resection rate, R0 resection rate and lower postoperative local recurrence rate (all P < 0.05). The differences in postoperative complication incidence, post-operative distant metastasis and postoperative mortality rate were not statistically significant between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONCRTS can significantly improve the survival and surgical conditions of patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma.

Chemoradiotherapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; therapy ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo analyze the complications and treatment results of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for esophageal carcinoma.

METHODSSixty patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma underwent esophagectomy through right thoractomy, 30 patients of whom received IORT of 15 - 25 Gy.

RESULTSIn patients who underwent IORT, 2 cases of pneumonitis, 1 case of anastomotic leak and 1 case of incisional wound infection were found. In patients underwent surgery only, 1 case of thoracic empyema and 1 case of anastomotic leak were found. All the complications ultimately healed. There was no operative mortality. During the follow-up of 3 years, in patients who underwent IORT, 2 of 3 died of radiation pneumonitis 24 and 26 months after IORT with one complicated with bronchoesophageal fistula. One of 3 died of multiple lung metastases. The 3-year survival rate was 88.0% (22/25) in IORT group and 76.0% (19/25) in surgery only group.

CONCLUSIONIntraoperative radiotherapy can reduce locoregional recurrence if performed to thoracic esophageal carcinoma patients without surgical contraindication or distant metastasis. Radiation pneumonitis, a common complication difficult to manage, implies a poor prognosis and, consequently, the lung and bronchus should be protected from the radiation.

Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Radiotherapy Dosage

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the survival in patients with N1 lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS110 patients with positive N1 lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous carcinoma were included in this study. The surgery group included 46 cases and the postoperative adjuvant therapy group included 64 cases (24 cases in the adjuvant chemotherapy subgroup and 40 cases in the adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two groups were compared and the prognostic factors were analyzed by multivariate Cox model.

RESULTSIn the postoperative adjuvant therapy group, the DFS (16.8 months) and OS (21.3 months) were significantly prolonged compared with those in the surgery group (10.6 months, P=0.007) and (13.7 months, P=0.001), respectively. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy significantly extended the OS (31.1 months) of N1-positive patients compared with 13.7 months (P=0.002) in the surgery group. But there were no significant differences between the DFS in the two subgroups (16.3 and 16.8 months, P=0.346) and between the OS (23.4 and 21.3 months, P=0.491). Postoperative adjuvant therapy was an independent prognostic factor in the ESCC patients with N1 lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONPostoperative adjuvant therapy can improve the prognosis and prolong the survival time in ESCC patients with positive N1 lymph node metastasis.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; mortality ; secondary ; therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Disease-Free Survival ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; therapy ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Postoperative Care ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: To evaluate survival rate and prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility included biopsy proven invasive carcinoma of the cervical or thoracic esophagus, confined to esophagus and mediastinum with or without regional lymph node and supraclavicular lymph node, and ECOG performance status H0-H2. Patients received radiation therapy with 5940 cGy over 7 weeks and chemotherapy, consisted of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day in continuous infusion for 5 days, days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33) and mitomycin C (8mg/m2 intravenous bolus at day 1). After concurrent chemoradiation, maintenance chemotherapy was followed with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day in continuous infusion for 5 days at 9th, 13th, and 17th weeks) and cisplatin (80mg/m2 intravenous bolus at the first day of each cycle). RESULTS: From November 1989 to November 1995, 44 patients were entered in this study. After treatment, complete response rate and partial response rate were 59% and 41%. Overall 1, 2, and 5-year survivals were 59%, 38%, and 9.6% (median 17 months). Prognostic factors affecting survival were response to treatment and T-stage. Among 26 complete responders, there were 6 local recurrences, 3 distant recurrences, 1 local and distant recurrence, and 2 unknown site recurrences. Acute and chronic complication rates with grade 3 or more were 20% and 13.6% and there was no treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation, compared with historical control groups that treated with radiation alone, improved median survival and did not significantly increase treatment-related complications. Complete responders had longer survival duration than partial responders. Predominant failure pattern was local failure. So, efforts to improve local control should be proposed.
Biopsy ; Cisplatin ; Drug Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms* ; Esophagus ; Fluorouracil ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Maintenance Chemotherapy ; Mediastinum ; Mitomycin ; Mortality ; Recurrence ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo analyze the relation between pathologic tumor response in preoperative radiotherapy and long-term survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma and the significance of radiosensitivity in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS176 esophageal cancer patients received preoperative radiotherapy and tumor resection from 1977 to 1989. The radio-response was classified into severe, moderate and mild according to the tumor pathologic response to radiotherapy. 191 patients treated by surgery alone served as control. The relation between radiation response of tumor and long-term survival and disease free survival was analyzed.

RESULTSThe 5-year survival rates of severe, moderate, mild and control groups were 60.7%, 46.4%, 21.1% and 38.8%. The survival was significantly improved in severe than moderate one (P = 0.029), moderate than mild group (P = 0.013) and severe than the control group (P = 0.000). It was only slightly improved in the moderate than control group (P = 0.295), but decreased in mild than the control group (P = 0.034). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 55.7%, 40.7%, 18.7% and 33.3% in severe, moderate, mild and control groups. The DFS was significantly improved in severe than moderate group (P = 0.029), moderate than mild group (P = 0.018), severe than the control group (P = 0.000 4). It was only slightly improved in moderate than the control group (P = 0.23), but decreased in the mild than the control group (P = 0.096). In the severe group, the proportion of stage T4, N1 lesion, TNM stage I-II and number of radical resection were 9.8%, 18%, 90.2%, and 90.2%. In the moderate group, they were 20.3%, 15.9%, 79.7% and 82.6%. In the mild group, they were 42.2%, 37.8%, 53.3% and 46.7%. In the control group, they were 50.3%, 40.8%, 37.7% and 77.5%. The rates of downstaging and surgical resection were improved only in severe and moderate groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONThe fact that only patients in whom severe radiation response are observed would appreciably benefit from preoperative radiotherapy whereas the others do not, illustrates that there might be no benefit of radiotherapy for radioresistant esophageal carcinoma. Radiosensitivity measurement before preoperative radiotherapy would be valuable for individualized treatment.

Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Recently, every effort has been made to improve the long term survival, but the general prognosis for patients with this disease remains poor. In this study, we reviewed 8 years of experiences with esophageal cancer patients managed in our department at Dong-A University Hospital and evaluated the effectiveness of cervical lymph node dissection performed selectively. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 1995 to August 2003, 70 patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in our department. Among them, 51 patients who underwent curative resection, had no double primary tumors and no neoadjuvant therapy were analyzed retrospectively. In most patients, intrathoracic esophagectomy and cervical esophago-gastrostomy was performed. Since 1997, 3-field lymph node dissection was performed selectively. RESULT: There were 46 men and 15 women. The median age was 60 years. The tumor was located in the upper third part in 10 patients (19%), middle third in 21 (41%), and lower third in 20 (40%). Majority of the patients (90%) had squamous cell carcinoma. Cervical anastomosis was made in 41 patients, and intrathoracic anastomosis in 10. 2-field lymph node dissection was done in 40 patients, and 3-field lymph node dissection in 11. The pathologic staging were as follows: stage I in 9 patients (17.6%), IIA in 20 (39.2%), IIB in 7 (13.7%), III in 11 (21.6%), IVA in 2 (3.9%), and IVB in 2 (3.9%). The in-hospital mortality was 3.9% (2 patients) and complications occurred in 24 patients (47%). Overall actuarial 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates were 74.4%, 48.4%, and 48.4% including operative mortality. The 4-year survival rate did not differ significantly between 3-field lymph node dissection group (50.5%) and 2-field lymph node dissection group (48.9%). In 3-field lymph node dissection group, the respiratory complications were more frequent and operative time was significantly longer. CONCLUSION: We think that curative resection for esophageal cancer can be performed with acceptable mortality, and aggressive surgical approach may improve the long term survival. even for advanced stages. Effectiveness of 3-field lymph node dissection needs further investigations.
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; Esophageal Neoplasms* ; Esophagectomy ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Mortality ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Operative Time ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate