1.Expression of verocytotoxic Escherichia coli antigens in tobacco seeds and evaluation of gut immunity after oral administration in mouse model.
Luciana ROSSI ; Alessia DI GIANCAMILLO ; Serena REGGI ; Cinzia DOMENEGHINI ; Antonella BALDI ; Vittorio SALA ; Vittorio DELL'ORTO ; Annelies CODDENS ; Eric COX ; Corrado FOGHER
Journal of Veterinary Science 2013;14(3):263-270
Verocytotoxic Escherichia (E.) coli strains are responsible for swine oedema disease, which is an enterotoxaemia that causes economic losses in the pig industry. The production of a vaccine for oral administration in transgenic seeds could be an efficient system to stimulate local immunity. This study was conducted to transform tobacco plants for the seed-specific expression of antigenic proteins from a porcine verocytotoxic E. coli strain. Parameters related to an immunological response and possible adverse effects on the oral administration of obtained tobacco seeds were evaluated in a mouse model. Tobacco was transformed via Agrobacteium tumefaciens with chimeric constructs containing structural parts of the major subunit FedA of the F18 adhesive fimbriae and VT2e B-subunit genes under control of a seed specific GLOB promoter. We showed that the foreign Vt2e-B and F18 genes were stably accumulated in storage tissue by the immunostaining method. In addition, Balb-C mice receiving transgenic tobacco seeds via the oral route showed a significant increase in IgA-positive plasma cell presence in tunica propria when compared to the control group with no observed adverse effects. Our findings encourage future studies focusing on swine for evaluation of the protective effects of transformed tobacco seeds against E. coli infection.
Administration, Oral
;
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
;
Animals
;
Antigens, Bacterial/genetics/metabolism
;
Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*pharmacology
;
Edema Disease of Swine/*immunology/microbiology
;
Escherichia coli Infections/immunology/microbiology/*veterinary
;
Escherichia coli Proteins/*genetics/metabolism
;
Female
;
Fimbriae Proteins/genetics/metabolism
;
Genetic Engineering
;
Intestines/immunology/microbiology/pathology
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred BALB C
;
Models, Animal
;
Plants, Genetically Modified/*genetics/metabolism
;
Seeds/genetics/metabolism
;
Shiga Toxin 2/genetics/metabolism
;
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics/immunology/*pathogenicity
;
Swine
;
Tobacco/*genetics/metabolism
;
Virulence Factors/genetics/metabolism
2.Outcomes of Bilateral Shoulder Arthroplasties: A Comparison of Bilateral Total Shoulder Arthroplasties and Bilateral Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasties
Ryan Matthew COX ; Tyler James BROLIN ; Eric Michael PADEGIMAS ; Mark David LAZARUS ; Charles Lonnie GETZ ; Matthew Lee RAMSEY ; Gerald Ross WILLIAMS ; Joseph Albert ABBOUD
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2019;11(3):316-324
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) for osteoarthritis (OA) versus bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs) for cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent bilateral TSAs for OA or bilateral RSAs for CTA with at least 2 years of follow-up. Twenty-six TSA patients (52 shoulders) were matched 2 to 1 with 13 RSA patients (26 shoulders) by sex, age at first surgery, and time between surgeries. Outcomes measured were shoulder range of motion (ROM), complications, and patient-reported scores. RESULTS: Preoperatively, TSA patients had significantly better forward elevation (FE) of both shoulders than RSA patients (dominant side [Dom]: 103° ± 32° vs. 81° ± 31°, p = 0.047; nondominant side [non-Dom]: 111° ± 28° vs. 70° ± 42°, p = 0.005) without significant differences in external (ER) or internal rotation (IR). Postoperatively, TSA patients had significantly better FE (Dom and non-Dom: 156° ± 12°, 156° ± 14° vs. 134° ± 24°, 137° ± 23°; p = 0.006, p = 0.019) and ER (42° ± 11°, 43° ± 10° vs. 24° ± 12°, 25° ± 10°; p < 0.001, p < 0.001) bilaterally and IR of their dominant arm (L1 vs. L4, p = 0.045). TSA patients had significantly better activities of daily living external and internal rotations (ADLEIR) scores (Dom and non-Dom: 35.3 ± 1.0, 35.5 ± 0.9 vs. 32.1 ± 2.4, 32.5 ± 2.2; p = 0.001, p = 0.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (94.2 ± 8.4, 94.2 ± 8.2 vs. 84.7 ± 10.0, 84.5 ± 8.0; p = 0.015, p = 0.004), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores (93.5 ± 7.6, 93.8 ± 11.8 vs. 80.5 ± 14.2, 82.3 ± 13.1; p = 0.014, p = 0.025), with no significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores (0.4 ± 1.0, 0.3 ± 1.0 vs. 0.7 ± 1.3, 0.8 ± 1.2) bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with bilateral TSAs and RSAs exhibited improved ROM and patient-reported outcomes. Those with bilateral TSAs had better functional outcomes than those with bilateral RSAs.
Activities of Daily Living
;
Arm
;
Arthroplasty
;
Elbow
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Osteoarthritis
;
Range of Motion, Articular
;
Shoulder
;
Surgeons
;
Tears
;
Visual Analog Scale