China ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; statistics & numerical data ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Endosonography

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The landscape of sedation for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures and the nature of the procedures themselves have changed over the last decade. In this study, an attempt is made to analyze the frequency and etiology of all major adverse events associated with GI endoscopy. METHODS: All adverse events extracted from the electronic database and local registry were analyzed. Although the data analysis was retrospective, the adverse events themselves were documented prospectively. These events were evaluated after subdivision into propofol-based anesthesia and intravenous conscious sedation groups. RESULTS: Cardiorespiratory events, including cardiac arrest, were the most common adverse events during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, while bleeding was more frequent in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Pancreatitis was the most frequent adverse event in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The frequencies of most adverse events were significantly higher in patients anesthetized with propofol. Automatic regression modeling showed that the type of sedation, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and the procedure type were some of the predictors of immediate life-threatening complications. CONCLUSIONS: Clearly, our regression modeling suggests a strong association between the type of sedation as well as various patient factors and the frequency of adverse events. The possible reasons for our results are the changing demographics, the worsening comorbidities of the patient population, and the increasing technical complexity of these procedures. Although extensive use of propofol has increased patient satisfaction and procedure acceptability, its use is also associated with more frequent adverse events.
Anesthesia ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Classification ; Colonoscopy ; Comorbidity ; Conscious Sedation ; Demography ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal* ; Heart Arrest ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Pancreatitis ; Patient Satisfaction ; Propofol ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics as Topic

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the effectiveness of an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-based treatment plan compared to an endoscopy-based treatment plan in selecting candidates with early gastric cancer (EGC) for endoscopic submucosal dissection based on the prediction of invasion depth. METHODS: We reviewed 393 EGCs with differentiated histology from 380 patients who underwent EUS from July 2007 to April 2010. The effectiveness of the EUS-based and endoscopy-based plans was evaluated using a simplified hypothetical treatment algorithm. RESULTS: The numbers of endoscopically determined mucosal, indeterminate, and submucosal cancers were 253 (64.4%), 56 (14.2%), and 84 (21.4%), respectively. Overall, the appropriate treatment selection rates were 75.3% (296/393) in the endoscopy-based plan and 71.5% (281/393) in the EUS-based plan (p=0.184). For endoscopic mucosal cancers, the appropriate treatment selection rates in the endoscopy-based plan were 88.1% (223/253), while the use of an EUS-based plan significantly decreased this rate to 81.4% (206/253) (p=0.036). For endoscopic submucosal cancers, the appropriate selection rates did not differ between the endoscopy-based plan (46.4%, 39/84) and the EUS-based plan (53.6%, 45/84) (p=0.070). CONCLUSIONS: EUS did not increase the likelihood of selecting the appropriate treatment in differentiated-type EGC. Therefore, EUS may not be necessary before treating differentiated-type EGC, especially in endoscopically presumed mucosal cancers.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Clinical Decision-Making/*methods ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*statistics & numerical data ; Endosonography/*statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa/ultrasonography ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Patient Selection ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery/*ultrasonography

PURPOSE: Little is known about the impact of weekend admission on acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH). Thus, we investigated whether day of admission due to AVH influenced in-hospital mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 294 patients with cirrhosis admitted between January 2005 and February 2009 for the management of AVH. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with weekend and weekday admission, and independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were determined by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: No demographic differences were observed between patients according to admission day or in the clinical course during hospitalization. Seventeen (23.0%) of 74 patients with weekend admission and 48 (21.8%) of 220 with weekday admission died during hospitalization (p=0.872). Univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis showed that initial presentation with hematochezia [p=0.042; hazard ratio (HR), 2.605; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.038-6.541], in-patient status at the time of bleeding (p=0.003; HR, 4.084; 95% CI, 1.598-10.435), Child-Pugh score (p<0.001; HR, 1.877; 95% CI, 1.516-2.324), and number of endoscopy sessions for complete hemostasis (p=0.001; HR, 3.864; 95% CI, 1.802-8.288) were independent predictors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Weekend admission did not influence in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis who presented AVH.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology/mortality/*physiopathology ; Hospitalization/*statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis/*complications/mortality/*physiopathology ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors

INTRODUCTIONThe Singapore National Survey of 2004 reported the prevalence of obesity to have increased to 6.9%, thus reflecting the profound changes in our society's lifestyle and eating habits. Bariatric surgery has steadily been increasing to counter the ill effects of obesity.

MATERIALS AND METHODSWe audited our prospective series of 31 patients who had laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LABG) for morbid obesity performed by our multidisciplinary team at the National University Hospital, Singapore, between August 2004 and December 2006.

RESULTSThe median age at presentation was 40 years old including 6 males and 25 females. Their median BMI was 42.35 kg/m(2). At a median follow-up of 26 months, the median percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 41.95%. The positive impact of gastric banding on comorbidities are evident whereby 15 (94%) of the diabetics had improved glycaemic control with HbA(1)C of 7.7% preoperatively improving to 5.9% postoperatively, and also 8 (58%) now take smaller doses of oral hypoglycaemic agents. Hypertension improved in 4 patients and 2 (11%) were cured. All our patients with dyslipidaemia had their statin doses reduced with marked lowering of serum lipid levels. We had 2 patients (6.45%) with band erosion and another 2 with reflux oesophagitis. Our article also summarises the available surgical procedures while discussing the pros and cons of each.

CONCLUSIONOur results showed that a multidisciplinary programme can achieve significant weight loss for obese patients in Singapore. To achieve long-term weight loss, a commitment of both the medical team and the patient is necessary. Laparoscopy has revolutionised the practice of bariatric surgery worldwide. LAGB is an effective and safe procedure.

Adult ; Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Comorbidity ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gastric Bypass ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals, University ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity, Morbid ; complications ; epidemiology ; surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study sought to characterize the current sedation practices of Korean endoscopists in real-world settings. METHODS: All active members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy were invited to complete an anonymous 35-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 22.7% (1,332/5,860). Propofol-based sedation was the dominant method used in both elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (55.6%) and colonoscopy (52.6%). The mean satisfaction score for propofol-based sedation was significantly higher than that for standard sedation in both examinations (all p<0.001). The use of propofol was supervised exclusively by endoscopists (98.6%). Endoscopists practicing in nonacademic settings, gastroenterologists, or endoscopists with <10 years of endoscopic practice were more likely to use propofol than were their counterparts (all p<0.001). In total, 27.3% of all respondents performed sedation practices without having undergone sedation training, and 27.4% did so without any formal sedation protocols. The choice of propofol as the dominant sedation method was the only significant predictor of endoscopist experience with serious sedation-related adverse events (odds ratio, 1.854; 95% confidence interval, 1.414 to 2.432). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-directed propofol administration is the predominant sedation method used in Korea. This survey strongly suggests that there is much room for quality improvement regarding sedation training and patient vigilance in endoscopist-directed sedation.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colonoscopy/methods/psychology ; Conscious Sedation/*methods/psychology/standards ; Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods/psychology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*methods/psychology ; Female ; Gastroenterology/methods ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards/*statistics & numerical data ; Propofol ; Quality Improvement ; Republic of Korea ; Surveys and Questionnaires

OBJECTIVE: To identify the CT features that help differentiate gastric schwannomas (GS) from small (5 cm or smaller) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and to assess the growth rates of both tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 16 small GSs and 56 GISTs located in the stomach. We evaluated the CT features including size, contour, surface pattern, margins, growth pattern, pattern and degree of contrast enhancement, and the presence of intralesional low attenuation area, hemorrhage, calcification, surface dimpling, fistula, perilesional lymph nodes (LNs), invasion to other organs, metastasis, ascites, and peritoneal seeding. We also estimated the tumor volume doubling time. RESULTS: Compared with GISTs, GSs more frequently demonstrated a homogeneous enhancement pattern, exophytic or mixed growth pattern, and the presence of perilesional LNs (each p < 0.05). The intralesional low attenuation area was more common in GISTs than GSs (p < 0.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that a homogeneous enhancement pattern, exophytic or mixed growth pattern, and the presence of perilesional LNs were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Tumor volume doubling times for GSs (mean, 1685.4 days) were significantly longer than that of GISTs (mean, 377.6 days) (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Although small GSs and GISTs show similar imaging findings, GSs more frequently show an exophytic or mixed growth pattern, homogeneous enhancement pattern, perilesional LNs and grow slower than GISTs.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Contrast Media/diagnostic use ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology/*radiography ; Humans ; Iohexol/analogs & derivatives/diagnostic use ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurilemmoma/pathology/*radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology/*radiography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods