Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has evolved to become an indispensable tool for tissue acquisition. While the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA is greater than 90% for lung cancer staging, it is lower for pancreatic mass lesions. Several factors such as location of the tumor, disease characteristics and procedural techniques determine the outcomes of EUS-FNA. In this review we evaluate the various technical factors that are keys to attaining optimal procedural outcomes.
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Lung Neoplasms ; Needles

No abstract available.
Cystadenoma, Serous* ; Diagnosis* ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration*

No abstract available.
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration* ; Fibrinolytic Agents* ; Hemorrhage* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Lymphatic Diseases

Subepithelial lesions are frequently encountered and remain a diagnostic challenge. Imaging of subepithelial lesions using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can be helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis of the lesion; however, definitive diagnosis typically requires tissue. Many methods for acquiring tissue exist including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration, Trucut biopsy, and fine needle biopsy. Obtaining adequate tissue is important for cytologic and histologic exams including immunohistochemical stains, thus a great deal of effort has been made to increase tissue acquisition in order to improve diagnostic yield in subepithelial lesions.
Biopsy ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Coloring Agents ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Endosonography ; Needles

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been used to diagnose gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs). Although rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions, on-site cytopathologists are not routinely available. Given this background, the usefulness of ROSE by endosonographers themselves for pancreatic tumors has also been reported. However, ROSE by endosonographers for diagnosis of SMT has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA with ROSE by endosonographers for SMT, focusing on diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), compared with that of EUS-FNA alone. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE by endosonographers for SMT followed by surgical resection were identified. Ten historical control subjects who underwent EUS-FNA without ROSE were used for comparison. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy for SMT was significantly higher in cases with than without ROSE (100% vs. 80%, p=0.03). The number of needle passes by FNA with ROSE by endosonographers tended to be fewer, although accuracy was increased (3.3±1.3 vs. 5.9±3.8, p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: ROSE by endosonographers during EUS-FNA for SMT is useful for definitive diagnosis, particularly for GIST.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle* ; Diagnosis* ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors* ; Humans ; Needles

Incidental pancreatic cysts are being increasingly recognized recently with incremented concern about health and frequent health check-up. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as the principal modality for imaging pancreas for various pancreatic diseases including pancreatic cyst. But imaging alone cannot accurately identify the exact nature of the pancreatic cyst. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration is a useful adjunctive procedure to differentiate pancreatic cystic lesions. Cystic fluid analysis with cytologic evaluation is important to diagnose etiology of pancreatic cystic lesions, helping the clinician to more accurately assess the presence or potential for malignancy.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Endosonography ; Pancreas ; Pancreatic Cyst ; Pancreatic Diseases

Accurate cancer staging is essential in patients with hollow viscus malignancy to decide therapeutic modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered as the best modality for local staging of hollow viscus cancer. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive and effective sampling method. EUS-FNA should be applied when positive diagnosis of malignancy can possibly change the choice of therapeutic options. EUS in conjunction with EUS-FNA can optimize stage-directed therapy which is helpful in selecting minimally invasive treatment option including endoscopic treatment and avoiding unnecessary surgery in advanced cases.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Endosonography ; Humans ; Neoplasm Staging ; Unnecessary Procedures

An accurate diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) is important because pancreatic cancer cannot be ignored if curative treatment is possible. Prompt and reliable diagnostic procedures are greatly needed for patients presenting with SPLs, particularly where resection is possible for a malignant mass. Several endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-related technologies including a novel EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (EUS-nCLE) can provide real-time images at the cellular level (1,000-fold magnification). A 19-gauge EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) needle is recommended because its channel is large enough for the 0.85-mm diameter nCLE miniprobe. The procedure is performed by standard EUS-FNA techniques with either pre- or post-loading technique. Ten percent fluorescein sodium (2.5–5 mL) is used as an enhancing agent and is intravenously injected immediately before puncturing the lesion. Only a few studies have used the technique and reported results. A recent study from 19 malignant and 3 benign SPLs classified EUS-nCLE findings according to 4 signs: dark clumps, and dilated vessels (predominantly seen in malignant SPLs) and fine white fibrous bands and normal acini (predominantly seen in benign SPLs). Using these criteria, researchers correctly diagnosed 18 of the malignant SPLs (94.7%). Another study described 2 lesions as having “dark cells aggregates with pseudo-glandular aspects, and straight hyperdense elements more or less thick corresponding to tumoral fibrosis” in 17 of 18 malignant SPLs. Thus far, no large and systematic study has been performed to evaluate the potential clinical use of EUS-nCLE for diagnosing SPLs. However, based on available information from a few studies and the current limitations of EUS-FNA, EUS-nCLE can potentially provide a complementary role in diagnosing such lesions. Nevertheless, more studies are certainly needed.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Diagnosis* ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Fluorescein ; Humans ; Needles ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; Ultrasonography

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is relatively rare and it occurs almost exclusively in women. We recently experienced three cases of SPN diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). These three cases were two male and one female patient whose age was 29, 37, and 44 years old. Radiological diagnosis was pancreatic endocrine tumor (PEN) showing solid with a heterogenous echogenicity. EUS-FNA cytology specimens consisted of single cells and aggregates of uniform cells, forming microadenoid structures, branching, papillary clusters with delicate fibrovascular cores. In conclusion, a single diagnosis of SPN based on clinical and radiological findings would be risky because there is a possibility of it being misdiagnosed as PEN or other malignancies. An EUS-FNA is therefore essential for establishing the diagnosis. In addition, the pathologists should recognize the characteristic cytologic findings with immunoprofiles of SPN to prevent misdiagnosis of SPN.
Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Diagnostic Errors ; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pancreas