OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the survival impact of lymphadenectomy in patients diagnosed with uterine clear cell cancer (UCCC). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of UCCC were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 1988 to 2007. Only surgically treated patients were included. Statistical analysis using Student t-test, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria; 955 patients (68.9%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Older patients (> or =65) were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy compared with their younger cohorts (64.3% vs. 75.9%, p<0.001). The prevalence of nodal metastasis was 24.8%. Out of 724 women who had disease clinically confined to the uterus and underwent lymphadenectomy, 123 (17%) were found to have nodal metastasis. Lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival. Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy were 39% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.72; p<0.001) less likely to die than patient who did not have the procedure. Moreover, more extensive lymphadenectomy correlated positively with survival. Compared to patients with 0 nodes removed, patients with more extensive lymphadenectomy (1 to 10 and >10 nodes removed) were 32% (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83; p<0.001) and 47% (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65; p<0.001) less likely to die, respectively. CONCLUSION: The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved survival of patients diagnosed with UCCC.
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/*diagnosis/mortality/pathology/*surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Endometrial Neoplasms/*diagnosis/mortality/pathology/*surgery ; Female ; Humans ; *Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Pelvis ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis/mortality/pathology/surgery

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the recurrence rates and patterns of failure in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma after surgical staging without adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Medical records of 229 patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma, treated with surgery alone between 2002 and 2010 at Siriraj Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The primary objective of this study was recurrence rates. The secondary objectives were patterns of failure, disease-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors related to outcomes. RESULTS: During median follow-up time of 53.3 months, 11 recurrences (4.8%) occurred with a median time to recurrence of 21.2 months (range, 7.7 to 77.8 months). Vaginal recurrence was the most common pattern of failure (8/11 patients, 72.7%). Other recurrences were pelvic, abdominal and multiple metastases. Factors that appeared to be prognostic factors on univariate analyses were age and having high intermediate risk (HIR) (Gynecologic Oncology Group [GOG] 99 criteria), none of which showed significance in multivariate analysis. The recurrence rates were higher in the patients with HIR criteria (22.2% vs. 4.1%, p=0.013) or patients with stage IB, grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma (9.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.199). Five-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival were 93.9% (95% CI, 89.9 to 5.86) and 99.5% (95% CI, 97.0 to 99.9), respectively. CONCLUSION: The patients with low risk stage I endometrial carcinoma had excellent outcomes with surgery alone. Our study showed that no single factor was demonstrated to be an independent predictor for recurrence.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/*surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTIONThe traditional approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer by laparotomy is increasingly being replaced by laparoscopic surgery. The advantages of laparoscopy have been well-documented. Laparoscopy avoids the morbidity of a laparotomy, overcomes the limitations of vaginal hysterectomy, provides adequate pathological information for an accurate surgical staging and expedites the postoperative recovery of patients. This paper reports the outcome of a series of 50 consecutive cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancers that were performed by the author. The objective is to review the perioperative, postoperative experience and survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer managed by laparoscopic surgery performed by a single surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe records of 50 consecutive patients with endometrial cancers from October 1995 to October 2007 treated by laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy (total and assisted) were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patients' attributes, endometrial cancers, surgical procedures, surgical complications and morbidity, perioperative experience, length of hospital stays and clinical outcome were analysed.

RESULTSLaparoscopic surgery was successful in all 50 patients and is clearly an option for the treatment of early endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSIONCareful patient selection and surgical competency are instrumental in ensuring successful treatment.

Adenocarcinoma ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Endometrial Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; epidemiology ; Pelvis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; trends ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine steroid sulfatase (STS) expression in endometrial cancer patients and its correlation with disease prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in 59 patients who underwent surgery with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer from January 2000 to December 2011 at Hanyang University Hospital. Immuno-histochemical staining of STS was performed using rabbit polyclonal anti-STS antibody. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 59 patients (27.1%) were positive for STS expression. Disease free survival (DFS) was 129.83±8.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 112.84-146.82] months in the STS positive group (group A) and 111.06±7.17 (95% CI: 97.01-125.10) months in the STS negative group (group B) (p=0.92). Overall survival (OS) was 129.01±9.38 (95% CI: 110.63-147.38) months and 111.16±7.10 (95% CI: 97.24-125.07) months for the groups A and B, respectively (p=0.45). Univariate analysis revealed that FIGO stage and adjuvant therapy are significantly associated with DFS and OS. However, in multivariate analysis, FIGO stage and adjuvant therapy did not show any statistical significance with DFS and OS. STS was also not significantly associated with DFS and OS in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: STS expression was not significantly associated with DFS and OS, despite positive STS expression in 27% of endometrial cancer patients. Therefore, the role of STS as a prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer remains unclear and requires further research.
Adult ; Aged ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality/*surgery ; Female ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Steryl-Sulfatase/*metabolism ; Uterine Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/*surgery