1.Necessity of Radical Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Patients with Cervical Invasion.
Taek Sang LEE ; Jae Weon KIM ; Dae Yeon KIM ; Young Tae KIM ; Ki Heon LEE ; Byoung Gie KIM ; D Scott MCMEEKIN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2010;25(4):552-556
To determine whether radical hysterectomy is necessary in the treatment of endometrial cancer patients with cervical involvement, we reviewed the medical records of women who underwent primary surgical treatment for endometrial carcinoma and selected patients with pathologically proven cervical invasion. Among 133 patients, 62 patients underwent extrafascial hysterectomy (EH) and 71 radical or modified radical hysterectomy (RH). The decision regarding EH or RH was made at the discretion of the attending surgeon. The sensitivity of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging for cervical invasion was 44.7% (38/85). In RH patients, 10/71 (14.1%) patients had frankly histologic parametrial involvement (PMI). All were stage III or over. Eight of 10 patients had pelvic/paraaortic node metastasis and two showed extrauterine spread. In 74 patients with stage II cancer, RH was performed in 41 and PMI was not seen. Sixty-six (89.2%) patients had adjuvant radiation therapy and there were 3 patients who had developed recurrent disease in the RH group and none in the EH group (Mean follow-up: 51 months). Although these findings cannot conclusively refute or support the necessity of radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical extension, it is noteworthy that the risk of PMI seems to be minimal in patients with a tumor confined to the uterus without evidence of extrauterine spread.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Databases, Factual
;
Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology/*pathology/*surgery
;
Female
;
Humans
;
*Hysterectomy/methods
;
Korea/epidemiology
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology/*pathology/*surgery
2.Clinical outcomes of stage I endometrial carcinoma patients treated with surgery alone: Siriraj Hospital experiences.
Suwanit THERASAKVICHYA ; Sompop KULJARUSNONT ; Janjira PETSUKSIRI ; Pattama CHAOPOTONG ; Vuthinun ACHARIYAPOTA ; Pisutt SRICHAIKUL ; Atthapon JAISHUEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2016;27(5):e48-
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the recurrence rates and patterns of failure in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma after surgical staging without adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Medical records of 229 patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma, treated with surgery alone between 2002 and 2010 at Siriraj Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The primary objective of this study was recurrence rates. The secondary objectives were patterns of failure, disease-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors related to outcomes. RESULTS: During median follow-up time of 53.3 months, 11 recurrences (4.8%) occurred with a median time to recurrence of 21.2 months (range, 7.7 to 77.8 months). Vaginal recurrence was the most common pattern of failure (8/11 patients, 72.7%). Other recurrences were pelvic, abdominal and multiple metastases. Factors that appeared to be prognostic factors on univariate analyses were age and having high intermediate risk (HIR) (Gynecologic Oncology Group [GOG] 99 criteria), none of which showed significance in multivariate analysis. The recurrence rates were higher in the patients with HIR criteria (22.2% vs. 4.1%, p=0.013) or patients with stage IB, grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma (9.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.199). Five-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival were 93.9% (95% CI, 89.9 to 5.86) and 99.5% (95% CI, 97.0 to 99.9), respectively. CONCLUSION: The patients with low risk stage I endometrial carcinoma had excellent outcomes with surgery alone. Our study showed that no single factor was demonstrated to be an independent predictor for recurrence.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/*surgery
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Treatment Outcome
3.Laparoscopic pelvic surgery for endometrial cancer.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2009;38(2):130-135
INTRODUCTIONThe traditional approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer by laparotomy is increasingly being replaced by laparoscopic surgery. The advantages of laparoscopy have been well-documented. Laparoscopy avoids the morbidity of a laparotomy, overcomes the limitations of vaginal hysterectomy, provides adequate pathological information for an accurate surgical staging and expedites the postoperative recovery of patients. This paper reports the outcome of a series of 50 consecutive cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancers that were performed by the author. The objective is to review the perioperative, postoperative experience and survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer managed by laparoscopic surgery performed by a single surgeon.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe records of 50 consecutive patients with endometrial cancers from October 1995 to October 2007 treated by laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy (total and assisted) were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patients' attributes, endometrial cancers, surgical procedures, surgical complications and morbidity, perioperative experience, length of hospital stays and clinical outcome were analysed.
RESULTSLaparoscopic surgery was successful in all 50 patients and is clearly an option for the treatment of early endometrial cancer.
CONCLUSIONCareful patient selection and surgical competency are instrumental in ensuring successful treatment.
Adenocarcinoma ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Endometrial Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; epidemiology ; Pelvis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; trends ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
4.Implications of a two-step procedure in surgical management of patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Emmanuelle ARSENE ; Geraldine BLEU ; Benjamin MERLOT ; Loic BOULANGER ; Denis VINATIER ; Olivier KERDRAON ; Pierre COLLINET
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2015;26(2):125-133
OBJECTIVE: Since European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations and French guidelines, pelvic lymphadenectomy should not be systematically performed for women with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) preoperatively assessed at presumed low- or intermediate-risk. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change of our surgical practices after ESMO recommendations, and to evaluate the rate and morbidity of second surgical procedure in case of understaging after the first surgery. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included women with EEC preoperatively assessed at presumed low- or intermediate-risk who had surgery between 2006 and 2013. Two periods were defined the times before and after ESMO recommendations. Demographics characteristics, surgical management, operative morbidity, and rate of understaging were compared. The rate of second surgical procedure required for lymph node resection during the second period and its morbidity were also studied. RESULTS: Sixty-one and sixty-two patients were operated for EEC preoperatively assessed at presumed low-or intermediate-risk before and after ESMO recommendations, respectively. Although immediate pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently during the first period than the second period (88.5% vs. 19.4%; p<0.001), the rate of postoperative risk-elevating or upstaging were comparable between the two periods (31.1% vs. 27.4%; p=0.71). Among the patients requiring second surgical procedure during the second period (21.0%), 30.8% did not undergo the second surgery due to their comorbidity or old age. For the patients who underwent second surgical procedure, mean operative time of the second procedure was 246.1+/-117.8 minutes. Third operation was required in 33.3% of them because of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Since ESMO recommendations, second surgical procedure for lymph node resection is often required for women with EEC presumed at low- or intermediate-risk. This reoperation is not always performed due to age/comorbidity of the patients, and presents a significant morbidity.
Aged
;
Carcinoma, Endometrioid/epidemiology/pathology/*surgery
;
Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology/pathology/*surgery
;
Female
;
Humans
;
*Hysterectomy/methods/statistics & numerical data
;
Lymph Node Excision/*methods/standards/statistics & numerical data
;
Middle Aged
;
Morbidity
;
Neoplasm Staging/standards
;
Pelvis
;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
;
Prognosis
;
Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
;
Retrospective Studies
;
*Salpingectomy/methods/statistics & numerical data
5.Evaluation of complications of different operation modes in endometrial cancer.
Min GAO ; Yu-nong GAO ; Xin YAN ; Hong ZHENG ; Guo-qing JIANG ; Wen WANG ; Nai-yi ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2013;35(12):932-935
OBJECTIVETo analyze the postoperative complications in patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing surgical operation in different modes and to explore the surgical safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.
METHODSTwo hundred and nineteen patients with endometrial cancer treated in our hospital between May 2006 and April 2012 were included in this study. Their clinicopathological data were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 65 patients received total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH+BSO group), 54 patients received TAH and BSO and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLX group), and 100 patients received TAH and BSO and PLX and para-aortic lymph node dissection (PALX group). The surgical procedures and postoperative complications in different operation modes were analyzed.
RESULTSThe operation time was (114.84 ± 6.45) min in the TAH+BSO group, (182.94 ± 6.62) min in the PLX group, and (188.27 ± 5.77) min in the PALX group. The operation time in the TAH+BSO group was significantly shorter than that in the PLX and PALX group (P < 0.001). The amount of blood loss was (222.97 ± 38.42) ml in the TAH+BSO group, (311.80 ± 21.62) ml in the PLX group, and (391.51 ± 53.20) ml in the PALX group. respectively. The amount of blood loss in the TAH+BSO was significantly less than that in the PLX and PALX group (P = 0.009). Lymphedema of the lower extremities was the most frequent complication of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and the incidence rate was 31.8%. Lymphocyst was the second frequent complication, with an incidence rate of 27.3%. The incidence rate of ileus in the PALX group was significantly higher than that in the PLX group (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence rate of lymphedema, lymphocyst and deep vein thrombosis between the PALX and PLX groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSRetroperitoneal lymph node dissection is an acceptable operation mode, although slightly increasing the incidence of ileus, compared with the TAH+BSO group. It is needed to choose appropriate indication in order to decrease the post-operative complications.
Adult ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid ; pathology ; surgery ; Endometrial Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Extremities ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Lymph Node Excision ; adverse effects ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Lymphedema ; etiology ; Lymphocele ; etiology ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Ovariectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Pelvis ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies