1.Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis in Bipolar and Unipolar Depression
Gamze ERZIN ; Güven ÖZKAYA ; Canan TOPÇUOĞLU ; Rabia Nazik YÜKSEL ; Özcan EREL ; Emine Feyza YURT ; Erol GÖKA ; Sinan GÜLÖKSÜZ
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2020;18(3):395-401
Objective:
Bipolar disorder and unipolar depressive disorder are complex phenotypes. There appear to be phenotypical, mechanistic, and therapeutic differences between bipolar depression (BD) and unipolar depression (UD). There is a need for understanding the underlying biological variation between these clinical entities. The role of oxidative processes underlying bipolar disorder and depression has been demonstrated. Thiol-disulfide homeostasis (TDH) is a recent oxidative stress marker. In this study, we aimed to inspect patients with bipolar depression and unipolar depression in terms of thiol-disulfide balance and to compare them with healthy controls.
Methods:
Patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital and diagnosed either as a depressive episode with bipolar disorder (n = 37) or unipolar depression (n = 24) according to DSM-5 criteria, along with healthy controls (HC) (n = 50), were included in the study. Native thiol, total thiol, and disulfide levels were compared across the groups.
Results:
In comparison to HC, both BD and UD groups had higher disulfide levels, disulfideative thiol ratio, and disulfide/total thiol ratio. No significant differences between BD and UD were detected in terms of disulfide level, disulfideative thiol ratio, and disulfide/total thiol ratio.
Conclusion
Increased levels of disulfide, native thiol, and disulfide/total thiol ratios compared to healthy controls in both UD and BD groups may be indicative of the presence of oxidative damage in these two clinical conditions. To clarify the role of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of depressive disorders and investigate TDH, longitudinal studies in patients with medication-free UD and BD are required.
2.A Comparison of the Effects of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone, Used on Level-3Intensive Care COVID-19 Patients, on Mortality: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study
Ahmet SARI ; Osman EKINCI ; Kemal Tolga SARAÇOĞLU ; Recep BALIK ; Mesut ASLAN ; Yelda BALIK ; Ceren ÖNAL ; Murat ASLAN ; Semra CEVHER ; Aylin PARMAKSIZ ; Şule VATANSEVER ; Münire Canan ÇICEK ; Özge Sayın AYAN ; Gaye Şensöz ÇELIK ; Açelya TOPRAK ; Mehmet YILMAZ ; Emine YURT ; Nurten BAKAN ; Selda TEKIN ; Esra ADIYEKE
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2023;38(29):e232-
Background:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is often a mild disease, usually manifesting with respiratory complaints, and is sometimes mortal due to multiple organ failure. Hyperinflammation is a known COVID-19 component and is associated with organ dysfunction, disease severity and mortality. Controlling hyperinflammatory response is crucial in determining treatment direction. An important agent in providing this control is corticosteroids. This study aimed to determine whether dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, doses, administration time and duration in COVID-19 treatment are associated with improved treatment outcomes.
Methods:
This retrospective multicenter study was conducted with participation of 6 healthcare centers which collected data by retrospectively examining files of 1,340 patients admitted to intensive care unit due to COVID-19 between March 2020 and September 2021, diagnosed with polymerase chain reaction (+) and/or clinically and radiologically.
Results:
Mortality in the pulse methylprednisolone group was statistically significantly higher than that in the other 3 groups. Mortality was higher in older patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney failure, coronary artery disease, and dementia. Pulse and mini-pulse steroid doses were less effective than standard methylprednisolone and dexamethasone doses, pulse steroid doses being associated with high mortality. Standard-dose methylprednisolone and dexamethasone led to similar effects, but standard dose methylprednisolone was more effective in severe patients who required mechanical ventilation (MV). Infection development was related to steroid treatment duration, not cumulative steroid dose.
Conclusion
Corticosteroids are shown to be beneficial in critical COVID-19, but the role of early corticosteroids in mild COVID-19 patients remains unclear. The anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids may have a positive effect by reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. Although dexamethasone was first used for this purpose, methylprednisolone was found to be as effective at standard doses. Methylprednisolone administered at standard doses was associated with greater PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratios than dexamethasone, especially in the severe group requiring MV. High dose pulse steroid doses are closely associated with mortality and standard methylprednisolone dose is recommended.