BACKGROUND

Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) help identify children at risk of clinical deterioration, but their accuracy across diverse settings, populations, interventions, and outcomes remains unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of PEWS in detecting clinical deterioration events (CDE) among pediatric patients seen at the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years seen at the ED.

SETTING

Southern Philippines Medical Center Emergency Department, Davao City, Philippines from January 2021 to December 2022.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Area under the curve (AUC) of PEWS in detecting CDE; Brighton PEWS optimal cut-off and its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR).

MAIN RESULTS

Among the 345 patients, 56 experienced CDE and 289 did not. Patients with CDE had significantly lower median age (1.00 year vs 5.00 years; pCONCLUSION

The Brighton PEWS demonstrates strong diagnostic accuracy in predicting CDE among pediatric patients. A cut-off score of ≥4.00 offers a balanced combination of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for ED application.

Human ; Emergency Departments ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Resuscitation ; Mortality

OBJECTIVETo investigate the current situation of treatment for acute chemical poisoning in the emergency departments and occupational disease departments of some general hospitals and to provide a basis for improving the ability of general hospital to deal with acute chemical poisoning.

METHODSFour hospitals from Shandong Province, Beijing City, and Shanxi Province, China were selected in the study. They included two first-class hospitals located in the downtown, where the patients with acute chemical poisoning from urban and suburban areas were admitted to the occupational disease departments, and two second-class hospitals located in the suburban area or county, where the patients with acute chemical poisoning from the suburban area were admitted to the emergency departments. A questionnaire survey was conducted in 141 medical workers (51 persons in the emergence department group and 90 persons in the occupational disease department group) that were engaged in the treatment of acute chemical poisoning in the four hospitals; 1999 medical records were analyzed. Individual in-depth interviews, questionnaire investigation, and field observation were used to compare the emergency department group and occupational disease department group in terms of the ability to deal with acute chemical poisoning and the training on treatment for acute chemical poisoning.

RESULTSThe emergency department group had significantly higher proportion of pesticide poisoning cases than the occupational disease department group (P<0.01). Thirty-seven of the patients in occupational disease department group died, with a fatality rate of 2.7%, and 14 of the patients in emergence department group died,with a fatality rate of 2.2%, so there was no significant difference between the two groups in this regard (P>0.05). There were significantly more cases treated without emergency plan in the emergency department group than in the occupational disease department group ( 37.3% vs. 10.0%, P <0.0 1). The occupational disease department group had significantly higher score of knowledge about the treatment for acute chemical poisoning than the emergence department group (7.2±1.3 vs. 5.2±0.9, P<0.01 ). There were significantly lower proportions of medical staff who had received training on the knowledge about acute chemical poisoning and on the emergency disposal of acute chemical poisoning in the emergency department group than in the occupational disease department group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONThere is a lack of the knowledge about treatment for acute chemical poisoning and protective measures during treatment among the medical staff in general hospitals, and related training and emergency plan are needed.

Acute Disease ; Adult ; China ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hospital Departments ; statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Male ; Poisoning ; therapy

In a narrow sense, the trauma team is intra-hospital organization that perform the initial assessment and resuscitation for the victims. Cooperation with the administrative and governance body of the hospital is essential for the function as a trauma center. The hospital could be as a core of the trauma care system with this support. Essential to this core position is a hospital trauma program that regulates and supports the trauma team activities. This trauma program consists of the hospital governance, administration, the trauma team and leader, trauma program manager, the registrar and the multidisciplinary committee of the performance improvement program. The essential elements of the trauma team include a trauma surgeon, an emergency physician, emergency department nurses, a laboratory and radiology technician, an anesthesiologist and a scribe. The team leader should be a trauma surgeon and coordinate the multidisciplinary professions in the team during the entire trauma care process. Clear criteria for the trauma team activation should be defined in advance. The composition of the team and the activation criteria may vary with the hospital capacity, the severity of injury, and the level of activation. The tiered criteria are based on clinical information from the field: physiologic and anatomic conditions and mechanism of injury and are recommended. The multidisciplinary committee for the performance improvement should monitor and assess trauma program outcomes. These activities will lead to trauma care improvements.
Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Resuscitation ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

From 2011 to 2016, 16 regional trauma centers were designated throughout the country and 9 of the 16 centers have been operating their own trauma facilities. At present, there are some differences in treatment experiences and levels according to the type and size of the trauma centers. Treating the trauma system as a part of emergency medical service, while the field of severe trauma is clearly different from the rest of emergency medical service in particular, has become a serious problem in Korea. First of all, the role of trauma centers should have been established before they are added to the trauma care system. Beyond that, manpower is the most important factor in building a trauma center. Pusan National University Hospital offers the ideal environment for a study on the relationship between trauma centers and emergency centers. Pusan National University Hospital has 2 independent emergency rooms: one each in the trauma center and emergency center. Therefore, it is possible to compare the outcomes of 2 different emergency rooms and identify the proportion of the trauma population who is transferred from the emergency center to the trauma center due to trauma severity index. Ultimately, the government and individual hospitals must support personnel in each trauma centers administratively and financially to sustain trauma centers over the long term. The purpose of this proposal is to suggest some resolutions to the problems associated with the trauma care system in Korea.
Busan ; Emergencies ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Korea* ; Trauma Centers* ; Trauma Severity Indices

PURPOSE: The Ministry of Health and Welfare recently designated 35 major trauma-specified centers (MTSC). The purpose of this study is to determine changes in patient flow and designated hospitals, and to describe the role of the emergency medical information center (EMIC) in a regional trauma care system. METHODS: Data of trauma patient inter-facility transfer arrangement by one EMIC were reviewed for 2 months before and after the designation of MTSC. The data included success or failure rates of the arrangement, time used for arrangement, and inquiring and accepting facility. RESULTS: At pre- and post-designation study period, there were 540 and 433 trauma patient inter-facility transfers arranged by EMIC, respectively. The median time used for arrangement decreased from 9.3 to 7.7 minutes (P = 0.007). Arrangement failure rate was 3.5% and 2.5%, respectively, with no significant interval change (P = 0.377). The percentage of inquiring MTSC decreased from 49.1 to 36.9% (P < 0.001). The percentage of accepting MTSC increased from 20.2 to 37.4% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With the designation of MTSC, EMIC could arrange inter-facility transfers more quickly. The hospitals wanted more trauma patients after the designation. There would be a concentration of trauma patients to MTSCs in our region. Further studies are needed for scientific evidence on patient outcome.
Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Information Centers ; Information Services ; Referral and Consultation ; Trauma Centers

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study to validate the effectiveness of the Korean criteria for trauma team activation (TTA) and compared its results with a two-tiered system. METHODS: This observational study was based on data from the Korean Trauma Data Bank. Within the study period, 1,628 trauma patients visited our emergency department, and 739 satisfied the criteria for TTA. The rates of overtriage and undertriage in the Korean one-tiered system were compared with the two-tiered system recommended by the American College of Surgery-Committee on Trauma. RESULTS: Most of the patient’s physiologic factors reflected trauma severity levels, but anatomical factors and mechanism of injury did not show consistent results. In addition, while the rate of overtriage (64.4%) was above the recommended range according to the Korean criteria, the rate of undertriage (4.0%) was within the recommended range. In the simulated two-tiered system, the rate of overtriage was reduced by 5.5%, while undertriage was increased by 1.8% compared to the Korean activation system. CONCLUSION: The Korean criteria for TTA showed higher rates of overtriage and similar undertriage rates compared to the simulated two-tier system. Modification of the current criteria to a two-tier system with special considerations would be more effective for providing optimum patient care and medical resource utilization.
Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Observational Study ; Patient Care ; Patient Care Team ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

The educational courses for trauma care are stratified into two classes. The first is the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course, which is sponsored by the Committee on Trauma (COT) of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and whose target learners are the surgeons who treat the victims of major trauma. The second is the Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS) course, which is sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and whose target learners are the pre-hospital healthcare providers, the nurses in emergency rooms, and the emergency physicians who provide emergency care to the victims of major trauma in the accident scene or in the emergency room before the trauma surgeons. The Emergency Medical Service System (EMSS) of Korea is managing to do its work somewhat well when it functions in the medical emergency situations. However, when it encounters with major trauma patients, it can rarely keep the principles of trauma care, such as the 'Golden Hour' and 'the rapid transportation to an appropriate trauma center directly' due to its systemic failure. Therefore the Preventable Death Rate (PDR) of major trauma patients is presumed to be very high in Korea. To rebuild the EMSS of Korea into a new system suitable for major trauma, the Korean Healthcare Administrations should start to lead the legislation and the support for trauma centers and trauma experts. The spread of the educational courses for trauma care into the emergency medical societies can be a starting point to solve the problem. The BTLS course is one of them.
Advanced Trauma Life Support Care ; Delivery of Health Care ; Emergencies ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Korea ; Mortality ; Societies, Medical ; Transportation ; Trauma Centers

PURPOSE: The committee on trauma of the american college of surgeons, in its manual resources for optimal care of the injured patients involved in falls from less than 20 feet need not be taken to trauma centers. Because triage criteria dictate less urgency for low-level falls, this classification scheme has demerits for early detection and treatment of serious problems in the emergency room. METHODS: A prospective analysis was conducted of 182 patients treated for fall-related trauma from June 2003 to March 2004. Falls were classified as group A (<3 m), group B (> or =3 m, <6 m), and group C (> or =6 m). Collected data included the patient's age, gender, site and height of fall, surface fallen upon, body area of first impact, body regions of injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: The 182 patients were classified as group A (105) 57.7%, group B (61) 33.5%, and group C (16) 8.8%. There was a weak positive correlation between the height of fall and the patients'ISS in the three groups (p<0.001). There were significant differences in GCS (p=0.017), RTS (p=0.034), and ISS (p=0.007) between group A and B. In cases that the head was the initial impact area of the body, the GCS (p<0.001) and the RTS (p=0.002) were lower, but the ISS (p<0.001) was higher than it was for other type of injuries. Hard surfaces as an impact surface type, had an influence on the GCS (p<0.001) and the ISS (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: To simply categorize patients who fall over 6 meters as severely injured patients doesn't have much meaning, and though patients may have fallen less than 6 meters, they should be categorized by using the dynamics (impact surface type, initial body-impact area) of their fall.
Body Regions ; Classification ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Foot ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Head ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Prospective Studies ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

PURPOSE: To explore the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients admitted to the trauma and emergency department (TED) of a tertiary care hospital due to tropical cyclone Fani and highlight the challenges faced by the hospital in this natural disaster. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the TED in the affected zone. Data of all victims affected by the cyclone Fani on May 3, 2019 were obtained from disaster records and medical case sheets. All patients except death on admission were included. Clinical variables included anatomical sites and severity of injuries which was assessed by revised trauma score (RTS) and injury severity score (ISS). Trauma injury severity score (TRISS) was also calculated. RESULTS: Of 75 patients, 74 were included and the other one was brought dead and thus excluded. The age, median ± interquartile range (IQ), was 41.0 (27.7-53.0) years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Most of the wounded were transported by the police control room vans on day 1: first 10 h, 50.0%; 10-24 h, 20.3%. The median ± IQ range of RTS, ISS and TRISS were 20 (14-28), 7.84 (7.841-7.841), and 97.4 (91.6-98.9), respectively. Simple external injury was the dominant injury type. Polytrauma (ISS >15) was seen in 67% cases and spine injury in 14% cases (7% cervical and 7% thoracolumbar). Injury causes included sharp flying objects (broken pieces of glasses and asbestos) in 31% cases, followed by fall of trees in 20.3%. Twenty-four patients were discharged after primary treatment, 30 admitted to the indoor-trauma ward or intensive care unit and 20 deferred or transferred to another center. There was no in-house mortality. Challenges were related to electricity failure, mobile network breakdown, infrastructure collapse, and delay in expertise repair from outside due to airport/railway closure. CONCLUSION In cyclonic storm like Fani, sharp flying objects, fall of trees/poles and collapsing walls constitute the common mode of injuries causing harm to more than one body regions. Polytrauma was seen in the majority of patients though external injury was the commonest. The affected hospital had the uphill task of treating hospitalized patients as well as disaster victims.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Cyclonic Storms ; Disaster Planning ; Disaster Victims ; statistics & numerical data ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Trauma Centers ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Young Adult

We studied retrospectively 1,112 mild head injury patients visited during a 2-year period to Dankuk University Medical Center to determine the clinical value of routine computerized tomography(CT) of the head and the indication of early discharge in patients with mild head injury(Glasgow coma scale score>or=13) at emergency room. Routine urgent cranial CT scans were obtained on all patients. Variables reviewed were mental status, symptom & sign of head trauma(brief loss of consciousness(LOC), amnesia, nausea and vomiting, headache). skull fracture on skull radiology, intracranial lesions, and operation. Patients with 13-14 Glasgow coma scale(GCS) or skull fracture have a significantly higher incidence of intracranial lesions and operation. Thus we suggest classifing patients with a GCS of 13-14 or skull fracture into "moderate" rather than "mild" in severity and recommend performing CT in all those patients. The patients with normal mental status(GCS score of 15) and no skull fracture have a rate of abnormal CT finding of 8.5% in the subgroup with history of LOC/amnesia and symptoms of head injury, but no patient in the subgroup without LOC/amnesia and symptoms of head injury. There was a few occurrence of delayed intracranial hematoma in normal mental status, but no patient required surgical intervention. We conclude that routine CT of the head in patients with GCS score of 13-14, skull fracture, and history of LOC/amnesia or symptoms of head injury in clear mental status is indicated. If the results of CT scan are normal, these patients may be safely discharged. But if there is no history of LOC/amnesia or symtoms of head injury in normal mental status, an immediate CT scan is not indicated and these patients may also be safely discharged.
Academic Medical Centers ; Amnesia ; Coma ; Craniocerebral Trauma* ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Head* ; Hematoma ; Humans ; Incidence ; Nausea ; Retrospective Studies ; Skull ; Skull Fractures ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed* ; Vomiting