BACKGROUND

Palliative Care focuses on the needs of both the patient and their families, aiming to enhance their overall quality of life. It achieves this by anticipating, preventing, reducing, and treating suffering through comprehensive support across various aspects of life. This approach promotes patient autonomy, provides access to information, and encourages the freedom to make choices. Referring patients to Supportive and Palliative Care in a timely manner enhances their quality of life, improving symptom control, mood, and understanding of their illness. Additionally, it reduces distress for both the patient and their caregiver during the end-of-life period.

This study aimed to determine the proportion of late referrals among patients diagnosed with debilitating illnesses consulting at the Emergency Department of Batangas Medical Center from July to December 2022 and who needed Supportive and Palliative Care using the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening Tool, considering age, sex, and the specific diagnosis of the debilitating illness. Additionally, the timing of referrals for both discharged and admitted patients requiring Supportive and Palliative Care was described, with categories including those referred within one week, beyond one week, and those not referred at all.

This retrospective study was conducted via chart review of all patients with debilitating illnesses who visited the Emergency Department of Batangas Medical Center, admitted or discharged, from July 2022 to December 2022. Timing of referral to Supportive and Palliative Care was obtained from the admission charts and/or the SPC referral logbook. Frequency analysis specifically frequency tabulation was used to summarize data.

Between July and December 2022, 2,097 patients diagnosed with debilitating illnesses at the Emergency Department were identified. Only 2.52% of them received referrals to Supportive and Palliative Care, and among this group, more than half (38) were referred later than one week after diagnosis.

This study identified the need for comprehensive improvements in the referral process, emphasizing timely access to Supportive and Palliative Care for patients of all demographic facing debilitating illnesses. The call for systemic changes advocates for clear protocols and guidelines, reducing oversight and delays. The Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening Tool can streamline referrals, while collaboration between healthcare providers and the palliative care team ensures a more efficient system. Strategies advocating for healthcare infrastructure improvement and awareness campaigns may be developed to facilitate timely referrals for patients across age and gender spectrums.

PURPOSE: The cancellation of reception in emergency department (ED) in Korea is similar to leaving without being seen in another country. But there are differences. We studied the actual conditions and reasons for cancellation of reception in the ED in each of several hospitals. METHODS: Thirty-six emergency centers and one hundred sixty-seven emergency physicians participated in this survey. We obtained information through a questionnaire about total hospital bed counts, emergency center bed counts, number of emergency physicians, number of cancellations of reception for one day, and emergency physicians' opinions about cancellation of reception. Also, we prospectively investigated reasons for cancellation of reception for emergency physicians and patients. We recorded the reason for cancellation of reception at the time of cancellation and then interviewed the patient by telephone within 10 days after their leaving the ED. RESULTS: Nine regional emergency centers, three specialized emergency centers, twenty-two local emergency centers and two local emergency facilities were involved in this study. We surveyed patient cancellation of reception from August 1, 2008, to October 31, 2008 in our hospital. The results of our study were variable but the average of cancellation of reception was 10% of all ED patients. The most common reason for cancellation of reception was the emergency physician sending the patient to an outpatient clinic, typically because they thought the patient had mild symptoms. The most common reasons causing emergency physicians to think about cancellation of reception were mild symptoms and too long a delay time. There was a significant difference of opinion between emergency physician and patient regarding cancellation of reception (p<0.01). The emergency physicians considered the reasons to be patient factors, while the patients considered the reasons to be doctor-related factors. CONCLUSION: There are many adverse effects from cancellation of reception in an ED for both emergency physicians and patients. We should considered methods for developing a consensus on ways to improve the situation.
Admitting Department, Hospital ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Consensus ; Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Korea ; Patient Dropouts ; Prospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telephone

OBJECTIVES: To reveal differences in drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and the reasons for alert overrides between admitting departments. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed using longitudinal Electronic Health Record (EHR) data and information from an alert and logging system. Adult patients hospitalized in the emergency department (ED) and general ward (GW) during a 46-month period were included. For qualitative analyses, we manually reviewed all reasons for alert overrides, which were recorded as free text in the EHRs. RESULTS: Among 14,780,519 prescriptions, 51,864 had alerts for DDIs (0.35%; 1.32% in the ED and 0.23% in the GW). The alert override rate was higher in the ED (94.0%) than in the GW (57.0%) (p < 0.001). In an analysis of the study population, including ED and GW patients, 'clinically irrelevant alert' (52.0%) was the most common reason for override, followed by 'benefit assessed to be greater than the risk' (31.1%) and 'others' (17.3%). The frequency of alert overrides was highest for anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic drugs (89%). In a sub-analysis of the population, 'clinically irrelevant alert' was the most common reason for alert overrides in the ED (69.3%), and 'benefit assessed to be greater than the risk' was the most common reason in the GW (61.4%). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the DDI alerts and the reasons for alert overrides differed by admitting department. Different strategies may be efficient for each admitting department.
Admitting Department, Hospital* ; Adult ; Antirheumatic Agents ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Drug Interactions ; Electronic Health Records ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Observational Study ; Patients' Rooms ; Prescriptions ; Retrospective Studies

In a narrow sense, the trauma team is intra-hospital organization that perform the initial assessment and resuscitation for the victims. Cooperation with the administrative and governance body of the hospital is essential for the function as a trauma center. The hospital could be as a core of the trauma care system with this support. Essential to this core position is a hospital trauma program that regulates and supports the trauma team activities. This trauma program consists of the hospital governance, administration, the trauma team and leader, trauma program manager, the registrar and the multidisciplinary committee of the performance improvement program. The essential elements of the trauma team include a trauma surgeon, an emergency physician, emergency department nurses, a laboratory and radiology technician, an anesthesiologist and a scribe. The team leader should be a trauma surgeon and coordinate the multidisciplinary professions in the team during the entire trauma care process. Clear criteria for the trauma team activation should be defined in advance. The composition of the team and the activation criteria may vary with the hospital capacity, the severity of injury, and the level of activation. The tiered criteria are based on clinical information from the field: physiologic and anatomic conditions and mechanism of injury and are recommended. The multidisciplinary committee for the performance improvement should monitor and assess trauma program outcomes. These activities will lead to trauma care improvements.
Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Resuscitation ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

From 2011 to 2016, 16 regional trauma centers were designated throughout the country and 9 of the 16 centers have been operating their own trauma facilities. At present, there are some differences in treatment experiences and levels according to the type and size of the trauma centers. Treating the trauma system as a part of emergency medical service, while the field of severe trauma is clearly different from the rest of emergency medical service in particular, has become a serious problem in Korea. First of all, the role of trauma centers should have been established before they are added to the trauma care system. Beyond that, manpower is the most important factor in building a trauma center. Pusan National University Hospital offers the ideal environment for a study on the relationship between trauma centers and emergency centers. Pusan National University Hospital has 2 independent emergency rooms: one each in the trauma center and emergency center. Therefore, it is possible to compare the outcomes of 2 different emergency rooms and identify the proportion of the trauma population who is transferred from the emergency center to the trauma center due to trauma severity index. Ultimately, the government and individual hospitals must support personnel in each trauma centers administratively and financially to sustain trauma centers over the long term. The purpose of this proposal is to suggest some resolutions to the problems associated with the trauma care system in Korea.
Busan ; Emergencies ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Korea* ; Trauma Centers* ; Trauma Severity Indices

PURPOSE: The Ministry of Health and Welfare recently designated 35 major trauma-specified centers (MTSC). The purpose of this study is to determine changes in patient flow and designated hospitals, and to describe the role of the emergency medical information center (EMIC) in a regional trauma care system. METHODS: Data of trauma patient inter-facility transfer arrangement by one EMIC were reviewed for 2 months before and after the designation of MTSC. The data included success or failure rates of the arrangement, time used for arrangement, and inquiring and accepting facility. RESULTS: At pre- and post-designation study period, there were 540 and 433 trauma patient inter-facility transfers arranged by EMIC, respectively. The median time used for arrangement decreased from 9.3 to 7.7 minutes (P = 0.007). Arrangement failure rate was 3.5% and 2.5%, respectively, with no significant interval change (P = 0.377). The percentage of inquiring MTSC decreased from 49.1 to 36.9% (P < 0.001). The percentage of accepting MTSC increased from 20.2 to 37.4% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With the designation of MTSC, EMIC could arrange inter-facility transfers more quickly. The hospitals wanted more trauma patients after the designation. There would be a concentration of trauma patients to MTSCs in our region. Further studies are needed for scientific evidence on patient outcome.
Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Information Centers ; Information Services ; Referral and Consultation ; Trauma Centers

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study to validate the effectiveness of the Korean criteria for trauma team activation (TTA) and compared its results with a two-tiered system. METHODS: This observational study was based on data from the Korean Trauma Data Bank. Within the study period, 1,628 trauma patients visited our emergency department, and 739 satisfied the criteria for TTA. The rates of overtriage and undertriage in the Korean one-tiered system were compared with the two-tiered system recommended by the American College of Surgery-Committee on Trauma. RESULTS: Most of the patient’s physiologic factors reflected trauma severity levels, but anatomical factors and mechanism of injury did not show consistent results. In addition, while the rate of overtriage (64.4%) was above the recommended range according to the Korean criteria, the rate of undertriage (4.0%) was within the recommended range. In the simulated two-tiered system, the rate of overtriage was reduced by 5.5%, while undertriage was increased by 1.8% compared to the Korean activation system. CONCLUSION: The Korean criteria for TTA showed higher rates of overtriage and similar undertriage rates compared to the simulated two-tier system. Modification of the current criteria to a two-tier system with special considerations would be more effective for providing optimum patient care and medical resource utilization.
Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Observational Study ; Patient Care ; Patient Care Team ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

The educational courses for trauma care are stratified into two classes. The first is the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course, which is sponsored by the Committee on Trauma (COT) of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and whose target learners are the surgeons who treat the victims of major trauma. The second is the Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS) course, which is sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and whose target learners are the pre-hospital healthcare providers, the nurses in emergency rooms, and the emergency physicians who provide emergency care to the victims of major trauma in the accident scene or in the emergency room before the trauma surgeons. The Emergency Medical Service System (EMSS) of Korea is managing to do its work somewhat well when it functions in the medical emergency situations. However, when it encounters with major trauma patients, it can rarely keep the principles of trauma care, such as the 'Golden Hour' and 'the rapid transportation to an appropriate trauma center directly' due to its systemic failure. Therefore the Preventable Death Rate (PDR) of major trauma patients is presumed to be very high in Korea. To rebuild the EMSS of Korea into a new system suitable for major trauma, the Korean Healthcare Administrations should start to lead the legislation and the support for trauma centers and trauma experts. The spread of the educational courses for trauma care into the emergency medical societies can be a starting point to solve the problem. The BTLS course is one of them.
Advanced Trauma Life Support Care ; Delivery of Health Care ; Emergencies ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Korea ; Mortality ; Societies, Medical ; Transportation ; Trauma Centers

PURPOSE: The committee on trauma of the american college of surgeons, in its manual resources for optimal care of the injured patients involved in falls from less than 20 feet need not be taken to trauma centers. Because triage criteria dictate less urgency for low-level falls, this classification scheme has demerits for early detection and treatment of serious problems in the emergency room. METHODS: A prospective analysis was conducted of 182 patients treated for fall-related trauma from June 2003 to March 2004. Falls were classified as group A (<3 m), group B (> or =3 m, <6 m), and group C (> or =6 m). Collected data included the patient's age, gender, site and height of fall, surface fallen upon, body area of first impact, body regions of injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: The 182 patients were classified as group A (105) 57.7%, group B (61) 33.5%, and group C (16) 8.8%. There was a weak positive correlation between the height of fall and the patients'ISS in the three groups (p<0.001). There were significant differences in GCS (p=0.017), RTS (p=0.034), and ISS (p=0.007) between group A and B. In cases that the head was the initial impact area of the body, the GCS (p<0.001) and the RTS (p=0.002) were lower, but the ISS (p<0.001) was higher than it was for other type of injuries. Hard surfaces as an impact surface type, had an influence on the GCS (p<0.001) and the ISS (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: To simply categorize patients who fall over 6 meters as severely injured patients doesn't have much meaning, and though patients may have fallen less than 6 meters, they should be categorized by using the dynamics (impact surface type, initial body-impact area) of their fall.
Body Regions ; Classification ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Foot ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Head ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Prospective Studies ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

PURPOSE: To explore the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients admitted to the trauma and emergency department (TED) of a tertiary care hospital due to tropical cyclone Fani and highlight the challenges faced by the hospital in this natural disaster. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the TED in the affected zone. Data of all victims affected by the cyclone Fani on May 3, 2019 were obtained from disaster records and medical case sheets. All patients except death on admission were included. Clinical variables included anatomical sites and severity of injuries which was assessed by revised trauma score (RTS) and injury severity score (ISS). Trauma injury severity score (TRISS) was also calculated. RESULTS: Of 75 patients, 74 were included and the other one was brought dead and thus excluded. The age, median ± interquartile range (IQ), was 41.0 (27.7-53.0) years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Most of the wounded were transported by the police control room vans on day 1: first 10 h, 50.0%; 10-24 h, 20.3%. The median ± IQ range of RTS, ISS and TRISS were 20 (14-28), 7.84 (7.841-7.841), and 97.4 (91.6-98.9), respectively. Simple external injury was the dominant injury type. Polytrauma (ISS >15) was seen in 67% cases and spine injury in 14% cases (7% cervical and 7% thoracolumbar). Injury causes included sharp flying objects (broken pieces of glasses and asbestos) in 31% cases, followed by fall of trees in 20.3%. Twenty-four patients were discharged after primary treatment, 30 admitted to the indoor-trauma ward or intensive care unit and 20 deferred or transferred to another center. There was no in-house mortality. Challenges were related to electricity failure, mobile network breakdown, infrastructure collapse, and delay in expertise repair from outside due to airport/railway closure. CONCLUSION In cyclonic storm like Fani, sharp flying objects, fall of trees/poles and collapsing walls constitute the common mode of injuries causing harm to more than one body regions. Polytrauma was seen in the majority of patients though external injury was the commonest. The affected hospital had the uphill task of treating hospitalized patients as well as disaster victims.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Cyclonic Storms ; Disaster Planning ; Disaster Victims ; statistics & numerical data ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Trauma Centers ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Young Adult