1.A retrospective study of single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.
Yong Soo HUR ; Eun Kyung RYU ; Seung Hyun SONG ; San Hyun YOON ; Kyung Sil LIM ; Won Don LEE ; Jin Ho LIM
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2016;43(2):106-111
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical outcomes of single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles according to the hatching status of frozen-thawed blastocysts. METHODS: Frozen-thawed blastocysts were divided into three groups according to their hatching status as follows: less-than-expanded blastocyst (≤EdB), hatching blastocyst (HgB), and hatched blastocyst (HdB). The female age and infertility factors of each group were evaluated. The quality of the single frozen-thawed blastocyst was also graded as grade A, tightly packed inner cell mass (ICM) and many cells organized in the trophectoderm epithelium (TE); grade B, several and loose ICM and TE; and grade C, very few ICM and a few cells in the TE. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rate were compared between each group. The data were analyzed by either t-test or chi-square analysis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in average female ages, infertility factors, or the distribution of blastocyst grades A, B, and C in each group. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and implantation rate of each group according to their blastocyst grade. However, there was a significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and implantation rate between each group. In the HdB group, the clinical pregnancy and implantation rate were similar regardless of the blastocyst quality. CONCLUSION: There was an effect on the clinical outcomes depending on whether the blastocyst hatched during single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. When performing single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer, the hatching status of the frozen-thawed blastocyst may be a more important parameter for clinical outcomes than the quality of the frozen-thawed blastocyst.
Blastocyst*
;
Embryo Transfer*
;
Epithelium
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Infertility
;
Pregnancy
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Single Embryo Transfer
;
Vitrification
2.Clinical Outcome of Elective Single Embryo Transfer Compared to Elective Double Embryo Transfer Performed at the Cleavage Stage
Sang Min KANG ; Sang Won LEE ; Hak Jun JEONG ; Soo Jin CHAE ; San Hyun YOON ; Jin Ho LIM ; Seong Goo LEE
Korean Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2010;37(4):349-359
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the clinical outcome of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) performed at the cleavage stage to that of elective double embryo transfer (eDET). METHODS: Of the women less than 36 years old who visited Daegu Maria from January 2008 to April 2009, the only women (n=330) with more than 8 mm of endometrial thickness and at least one good quality embryo, who were treated with GnRH agonist long protocol, were included in this study. After information about complications that can arise by multiple embryo transfer, either eSET or eDET was conducted by their request (167 and 163, respectively). RESULTS: The implantation rate of eSET group was significantly higher than that of eDET group (53.9% vs. 40.2%, p<0.01). The twin pregnancy rate of eSET group was significantly lower than that of eDET group (1.1% vs. 32.3%, p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences between two groups in the clinical pregnancy (53.3% vs. 60.7%, p=0.172), ongoing pregnancy (47.3% vs. 54.6%, p=0.185) and live birth rates (44.9% vs. 50.9%, p=0.275). The number of the surplus embryos which developed to the blastocyst stage and cryopreserved at that stage was significantly higher in eSET group than that of eDET group (3.2+/-2.6 vs. 2.1+/-2.4, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that eSET should reduce significantly the multiple baby pregnancy without decreasing the whole pregnancy rate in women with less than 36 years old.
Blastocyst
;
Embryo Transfer
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
;
Humans
;
Live Birth
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Pregnancy, Twin
;
Single Embryo Transfer
3.Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer.
Ling SUN ; Zhi-Heng CHEN ; Min-Na YIN ; Yu DENG ; Jun LIU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2016;37(4):512-516
OBJECTIVETo compare the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in elective single versus two cleavage-stage embryo transfer.
METHODSFresh cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles between January, 2014 and October, 2015 were reviewed, including 39 single embryo transfer (eSET) cycles and 200 double embryo transfer (DET) cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, multiple pregnancy rates, live birth rate, and obstetric outcomes (gestational age, preterm delivery rate and mean birth weight) were compared between the two groups.
RESULTSThe baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The estradiol level on the day of trigger and the oocyte number were significantly higher in eSET group than in DET group (10654.4 pmol/L vs 8284.2 pmol/L and 8.4 vs 7.0, respectively). No significant difference was found in the pregnancy rate (56.4% vs 66.0%) or live birth rate (48.7% vs 51.5%) between the two groups, and their implantation rates differed significantly (56.4% vs 37.8%). No multiple pregnancies occurred in eSET group while the rate of multiple pregnancies was 22.7% in DET group. The gestational age and mean birth weight were significantly higher in eSET group (P<0.05), and the preterm delivery rate after DET was nearly three times of that after eSET, although this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONSElective single embryo transfer can be performed without compromising the live birth rates. Multiple pregnancy rates can be significantly reduced with eSET, which also results in a higher chance of delivering a term singleton live birth compared with DET.
Birth Weight ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy, Multiple ; Single Embryo Transfer
4.Array comparative genomic hybridization screening in IVF significantly reduces number of embryos available for cryopreservation.
Jiaen LIU ; E Scott SILLS ; Zhihong YANG ; Shala A SALEM ; Tayyab RAHIL ; Gary S COLLINS ; Xiaohong LIU ; Rifaat D SALEM
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2012;39(2):52-57
OBJECTIVE: During IVF, non-transferred embryos are usually selected for cryopreservation on the basis of morphological criteria. This investigation evaluated an application for array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in assessment of surplus embryos prior to cryopreservation. METHODS: First-time IVF patients undergoing elective single embryo transfer and having at least one extra non-transferred embryo suitable for cryopreservation were offered enrollment in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: Patients in group A (n=55) had embryos assessed first by morphology and then by aCGH, performed on cells obtained from trophectoderm biopsy on post-fertilization day 5. Only euploid embryos were designated for cryopreservation. Patients in group B (n=48) had embryos assessed by morphology alone, with only good morphology embryos considered suitable for cryopreservation. RESULTS: Among biopsied embryos in group A (n=425), euploidy was confirmed in 226 (53.1%). After fresh single embryo transfer, 64 (28.3%) surplus euploid embryos were cryopreserved for 51 patients (92.7%). In group B, 389 good morphology blastocysts were identified and a single top quality blastocyst was selected for fresh transfer. All group B patients (48/48) had at least one blastocyst remaining for cryopreservation. A total of 157 (40.4%) blastocysts were frozen in this group, a significantly larger proportion than was cryopreserved in group A (p=0.017, by chi-squared analysis). CONCLUSION: While aCGH and subsequent frozen embryo transfer are currently used to screen embryos, this is the first investigation to quantify the impact of aCGH specifically on embryo cryopreservation. Incorporation of aCGH screening significantly reduced the total number of cryopreserved blastocysts compared to when suitability for freezing was determined by morphology only. IVF patients should be counseled that the benefits of aCGH screening will likely come at the cost of sharply limiting the number of surplus embryos available for cryopreservation.
Biopsy
;
Blastocyst
;
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
;
Cryopreservation
;
Embryo Transfer
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Fertilization in Vitro
;
Freezing
;
Humans
;
Mass Screening
;
Preimplantation Diagnosis
;
Single Embryo Transfer
5.Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles.
Jin Hee EUM ; Jae Kyun PARK ; So Young KIM ; Soo Kyung PAEK ; Hyun Ha SEOK ; Eun Mi CHANG ; Dong Ryul LEE ; Woo Sik LEE
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2016;43(3):164-168
OBJECTIVE: Assisted reproductive technology has been associated with an increase in multiple pregnancies. The most effective strategy for reducing multiple pregnancies is single embryo transfer. Beginning in October 2015, the National Supporting Program for Infertility in South Korea has limited the number of embryos that can be transferred per in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle depending on the patient's age. However, little is known regarding the effect of age and number of transferred embryos on the clinical outcomes of Korean patients. Thus, this study was performed to evaluate the effect of the number of transferred blastocysts on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This study was carried out in the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center from January 2013 to December 2014. The clinical outcomes of 514 women who underwent the transfer of one or two blastocysts on day 5 after IVF and of 721 women who underwent the transfer of one or two vitrified-warmed blastocysts were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: For both fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate were not significantly different between patients who underwent elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT) and patients who underwent double blastocyst transfer (DBT), regardless of age. However, the multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the eSBT group than in the DBT group. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of eSBT and DBT were equivalent, but eSBT had a lower risk of multiple pregnancy and is, therefore, the best option.
Blastocyst*
;
Embryo Transfer*
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Fertility
;
Fertilization in Vitro
;
Humans
;
Infertility
;
Korea
;
Live Birth
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Pregnancy, Multiple
;
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Single Embryo Transfer
6.Retrospective study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles according to the presence of morphokinetic variables.
Yong Soo HUR ; Eun Kyung RYU ; Chang Seop HYUN ; Seong Ho YANG ; San Hyun YOON ; Kyung Sil LIM ; Won Don LEE ; Jin Ho LIM
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2018;45(1):52-55
This study retrospectively assessed whether time-lapse data relating to developmental timing and morphology were associated with clinical outcomes, with the eventual goal of using morphokinetic variables to select embryos prospectively for cryopreservation. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles that were cultured in a time-lapse incubation system. The morphokinetic variables included uneven pronuclei, an uneven blastomere, multinucleation, and direct, rapid, and irregular division. A total of 164 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles were analyzed (102 cycles of regularly developed blastocysts and 62 cycles of blastocysts with morphokinetic variables). No significant differences in the age of females or the standard blastocyst morphology were found between these two groups. The regularly developed blastocysts showed significantly higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than the blastocysts exhibiting morphokinetic variables (30.4% vs. 9.7% and 37.3% vs. 14.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). The blastocysts that exhibited morphokinetic variables showed different mean development times compared with the regularly developed blastocysts. Although morphokinetic variables are known to have fatal impacts on embryonic development, a considerable number of embryos developed to the blastocyst stage. Morphokinetic variables had negative effects on the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. These findings suggest that blastocysts cultured in a time-lapse incubation system should be considered for selective cryopreservation according to morphokinetic variables.
Blastocyst*
;
Blastomeres
;
Cryopreservation
;
Embryo Transfer*
;
Embryonic Development
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Prospective Studies
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Single Embryo Transfer
7.Live birth outcomes of vitrified embryos generated under growth hormone stimulation are improved for women categorized as poor-prognosis
Kevin N KEANE ; Yun YE ; Peter M HINCHLIFFE ; Sheena LP REGAN ; Satvinder S DHALIWAL ; John L YOVICH
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2019;46(4):178-188
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical pregnancy (CP) and live birth (LB) rates arising from frozen embryo transfers (FETs) that had been generated under the influence of in vitro fertilization (IVF) adjuvants given to women categorized as poor-prognosis.METHODS: A registered, single-center, retrospective study. A total of 1,119 patients with first FETs cycle include 310 patients with poor prognosis (109 treated with growth hormone [GH], (+)GH group vs. 201 treated with dehydroepiandrosterone, (–)GH group) and 809 patients with good prognosis (as control, (–)Adj (Good) group).RESULTS: The poor-prognosis women were significantly older, with a lower ovarian reserve than the (–)Adj (Good) group, and demonstrated lower chances of CP (p<0.005) and LB (p<0.005). After adjusting for confounders, the chances of both CP and LB in the (+)GH group were not significantly different from those in the (–)Adj (Good) group, indicating that the poor-prognosis patients given GH had similar outcomes to those with a good prognosis. Furthermore, the likelihood of LB was significantly higher for poor-prognosis women given GH than for those who did not receive GH (p<0.028). This was further confirmed in age-matched analyses.CONCLUSION: The embryos cryopreserved from fresh IVF cycles in which adjuvant GH had been administered to women classified as poor-prognosis showed a significant 2.7-fold higher LB rate in subsequent FET cycles than a matched poor-prognosis group. The women with a poor prognosis who were treated with GH had LB outcomes equivalent to those with a good prognosis. We therefore postulate that GH improves some aspect of oocyte quality that confers improved competency for implantation.
Dehydroepiandrosterone
;
Embryo Transfer
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Fertilization in Vitro
;
Growth Hormone
;
Humans
;
Live Birth
;
Melatonin
;
Oocytes
;
Ovarian Reserve
;
Pregnancy
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Single Embryo Transfer
8.Influence of Maternal Age on Embryo Quality and the Frequency of Multiple Pregnancy in IVF-ET Program.
Myeong Seop LEE ; Jang Ok PARK ; Ji Hak JUNG ; Jun Suk PARK ; Hee Gyoo KANG ; Dong Hoon KIM ; Ho Joon LEE
Korean Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2000;27(3):261-266
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the influence of maternal age on embryo quality and the frequency of multiple pregnancy in IVF-ET program. METHOD: 86 conventional IVF-ET cycles were divided into three groups according to the age by 5 year (group A: 26-30, group B: 3135, group C: 36-40 yrs). The in vitro fertilization and development outcome (fertilization, cleavage and high quality embryo rate) and the pregnancy outcome (pregnancy, implantation, G-sac/high quality embryo and multiple pregnancy rate) were examined. And then, these results were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The rates of fertilization (62.7, 68.5 and 65.4%, respectively) and cleavage (95.6, 97.6 and 98.0%, respectively) were not different among the groups. And the high quality embryo (HQE) rate also was not different among the groups (61.8, 62.9 and 62.8%, respectively). The pregnancy rate of group C (23.3%) was significantly lower than that of group A (41.2%) and B (48.7%). And the implantation rate was significantly decreased to group B (32.2%) and C (14.3%) when compared to group A (71.4%) and B (36.8%). CONCLUSION: The pregnancy rate was significantly decreased over 35 years. The G-sac/HQE and multiple pregnancy rate were significantly high below 31 years. Thus, these results suggest that the number of high quality embryo transferred should be limited by the age and another criteria for embryo quality evaluation were required for single embryo transfer.
Embryonic Structures*
;
Female
;
Fertilization
;
Fertilization in Vitro
;
Maternal Age*
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Outcome
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Pregnancy, Multiple*
;
Single Embryo Transfer
9.Heterotopic pregnancy after a single embryo transfer.
Ji Sun LEE ; Hyun Hwa CHA ; Ae Ra HAN ; Seong Goo LEE ; Won Joon SEONG
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2016;59(4):316-318
Heterotopic pregnancy is a rare and life-threatening condition which is defined as coexistent intrauterine and ectopic gestation. The risk of ectopic and heterotopic pregnancy is increasing due to the increased risk of multiple pregnancies with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies. However, it hardly happens in the setting of single embryo transfer, since single embryo transfer significantly reduces the incidence of multiple pregnancies. Surprisingly, we experienced a case of heterotopic pregnancy after a single embryo transfer caused by coincidental natural pregnancy during assisted reproductive technologies. An infertile woman who underwent, during her natural cycle, transfer of a single embryo that had been cryopreserved for 3 years was found to be heterotopically pregnant. After an early and successful management with laparoscopic right salpingectomy, she finally reached at full-term vaginal delivery.
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy, Heterotopic*
;
Pregnancy, Multiple
;
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
;
Salpingectomy
;
Single Embryo Transfer*
10.Comparison of elective single cleavage-embryo transfer to elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer in human IVF-ET.
Sang Min KANG ; Sang Won LEE ; Hak Jun JEONG ; San Hyun YOON ; Jin Ho LIM ; Seong Goo LEE
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2011;38(1):53-60
OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to compare the clinical outcome of elective single cleavage-embryo transfer (eSCET) to that of elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer (eSBET) in human IVF-ET. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study which analyzed for 614 women who visited the Daegu Maria Clinic from August 2008 to December 2009. All were under 37 years old and had more than 8 mm of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration and at least one good quality embryo on day 3. The eSCETs were performed on day 3 (n=450) and the eSBETs were conducted on day 5 (n=164). RESULTS: The numbers of retrieved oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and day 3 good quality embryos were significantly lower in the eSCET group (12.1+/-6.0, 8.2+/-4.6, and 4.2+/-3.1, respectively) compared to the eSBET group (16.7+/-7.2, 12.1+/-5.0, and 8.5+/-4.5, respectively; p<0.001). However, the clinical pregnancy, implantation, on-going pregnancy, and live birth rates of the eSCET group (46.7, 46.9, 40.0, and 36.7%, respectively) were not statistically different from those of the eSBET group (51.2, 51.8, 45.1, and 43.9%, respectively; p=0.318, 0.278, 0.254, and 0.103, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that elective single embryo transfer should be performed regardless of the developmental stage to women less than 37 years old who had more than 8 mm of endometrial thickness on the hCG administration day and at least one good quality embryo on day 3 in order to reduce the twin pregnancy rate without reducing the whole pregnancy rate.
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Live Birth
;
Oocytes
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Pregnancy, Twin
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Single Embryo Transfer
;
Twins