1.Cost-effectiveness of three-stage newborns hearing screening in Beijing.
Youli HAN ; Lihui HUANG ; Wei ZHANG ; Email: ZW296@SINA.COM. ; Yanmei ZHANG ; Xiao JIA ; Tingting NI ; Huihong SUN ; Ping LIANG ; Huan YU ; Yan GUO ; Ai ZHANG ; Jiahui LI ; Hua ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2015;36(5):455-459
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two-stage and three-stage hearing screenings for newborns.
METHODSHearing screening was performed for the normal newborns born in 7 hospitals in Beijing from October 2010 to December 2012 by using two stage and three stage strategies as well as hearing diagnostic test, and the cost effectiveness evaluation of two strategies was conducted. The data about the cost of screening and diagnostic test were from the hospitals. The data about car fare and charge for loss of working time of parents were collected through questionnaire survey. The sensitivity was analyzed according to the compliance rate.
RESULTSA total of 62,695 newborns received initial hearing screening, 5,809 newborns failed, the positive rate was 9.30%. A total of 4,933 newborns received rescreening, 972 newborns failed, the positive rate was 19.70%. Among the newborns failed in rescreening, 412 were provided with hearing diagnostic test and 360 received diagnostic test. The diagnostic test indicated that the hearing of 217 newborns were abnormal (60.28%). A total of 276 newborns received the third screening, 163 newborns failed, in which 125 received diagnostic test and 112 had abnormal hearing (45 had moderate and above hearing impairment), the abnormal rate was 89.60%. The average cost for three-stage screening (37,242 yuan RMB per case) was higher than that for two-stage screening (19,985 yuan RMB per case). With the increase of compliance, the cost-effectiveness of three-stage screening increased.
CONCLUSIONThe cost-effectiveness of three-stage screening was influenced by screening compliance. It is recommended that three-stage screening strategy might be taken in area where the screening compliance rate is >90%.
Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Hearing Loss ; diagnosis ; Hearing Tests ; economics ; methods ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatal Screening ; economics ; methods
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail