The patient was a 63-year-old man, who had developed cerebral infarction during treatment for sleep apnea syndrome. He also presented typical features of deep venous thrombosis of the right lower extremity. Transesophageal echocardiography clearly showed the blood flow passing through the patent foramen ovale (PFO) followed by Valsalva maneuver. Paradoxical cerebral embolism caused by a PFO was diagnosed. Several procedures were considered to prevent recurrence of cerebral infarction, he underwent PFO closure by minimally invasive procedure, so-called port-access cardiac surgery. He started walking on the day of surgery, and postoperative echocardiography showed no residual shunt flow. Currently, no catheter-based PFO closure device is allowed in Japan, the PFO closure by the port-access technique should be considered as a feasible alternative.

Objective : Although dissection extending to the aortic root is a common finding, it is potentially fatal in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical results of acute type A aortic dissection with proximal involvement. The proximal extension of dissection, types of aortic root procedure and its feasibility were investigated. Methods : Between 1997 and 2011, 80 patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent emergent operation. Results : Dissection reaching around the coronary artery orifice was observed in 28 patients. In 11 patients, both left and right coronary arteries were involved with aortic dissection. Aortic root replacement was performed in 4 patients. In 7 patients, the dissected aortic root was reinforced by GRF glue and proximal aorta was replaced with a graft. Among these patients, postoperative aortic root redissection with severe aortic regurgitation was observed in 5 patients during postoperative long-term periods. All of them required surgical re-intervention of the aortic root. In 17 patients, dissection was extended to the right coronary artery. Aortic root reconstruction was performed in 2 patients due to pre-existing annulo-aortic ectasia. The remaining 15 patients underwent proximal reinforcement with GRF glue. No patient showed dissection extending to the left coronary artery alone. Operative mortality was 11% and other types of complications concerning the aortic root was not observed. Conclusion : An acceptable outcome was demonstrated with our surgical strategy of proximal aortic dissection. For patients, in particular, with proximal involvement to both the left and right coronary arteries, redissection of the aortic root should be noticed as a late complication with considerable frequency. Special care should be taken for precise recognition of the proximal extension of dissection and appropriate surgical procedure including simultaneous aortic root replacement.

Secondary abdominal fascial closure by abdominal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is required for abdominal organ protection and prevention of infection due to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) developing after the surgery. In this paper, we present our experience with abdominal VAC therapy for two cases that required open abdominal management after surgical repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, with favorable outcomes. Case 1 involved a 72-year-old man who underwent endovascular aortic repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Abdominal VAC therapy was started after decompression laparotomy because he developed ACS immediately after surgery. Secondary abdominal fascial closure was performed on day 4 postoperatively, and he had no complications. Case 2 involved a 71-year-old man who underwent emergency Y-graft replacement for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. We considered secondary abdominal fascial closure necessary because of prominent intestinal edema and massive retroperitoneal hematoma, and performed abdominal VAC therapy. We changed the VAC system on day 4, postoperatively and performed secondary abdominal fascial closure on day 7, postoperatively. Abdominal VAC therapy is considered effective and safe for patients requiring secondary abdominal fascial closure after abdominal surgery.

We report the case of a 76-year-old man who developed type IA endoleak through the fenestration after 1-debranch TEVAR using a Najuta endograft. The patient was admitted with expansion of the aneurysm after TEVAR, for additional therapy. Type IA endoleak through a fenestration has remained a significant clinical concern and its treatment is challenging. We performed Zone 0 TEVAR using the “Squid-Capture” technique assisted in situ stent-graft fenestration. Cerebral vessels were perfused by a percutaneous cardiopulmonary support system during in situ stent-graft fenestration, and the cerebral branch was clamped at the proximal site. It is difficult to operate the catheter inside the endoskeleton structure of a Najuta endograft, but several innovations were effective. Test dilation of the balloon catheter was performed to ensure that the wire did not interfere with the endoskeleton. Avoiding interference with the endoskeleton is important. The Squid-Capture technique allows safe and secure puncture of the graft. The operation was completed successfully. After this procedure, the endoleak disappeared. It is considered to be a useful method for treatment of endoleak through the fenestration.

An 18-year-old man with hypoxic encephalopathy was admitted because of recurrent minor bleeding a tracheal stoma, which was suspected as a tracheo-innominate artery fistula (TIF). He had undergone tracheostomy and gastrostomy 2 years prior and had mild opisthotonos and scoliosis. Although tracheal endoscopy showed no tracheal mucosal erosion, necrosis, or granulation tissue formation, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a close contact between the innominate artery and the anterior wall of the trachea, and an equal height between the innominate artery and the tip of the tracheal cannula. Magnetic resonance angiography of the head showed dominant intracranial blood flow from the left internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Preventive innominate artery transection through the supra-sternal approach without sternotomy or reconstruction of the innominate artery was performed for this high-risk case of TIF. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Postoperative CT revealed that the innominate artery was transected and isolated from the site of tracheostomy. The preserved connection between the right common carotid and subclavian artery at the distal sutured stump helped maintain blood flow in the right internal and middle cerebral arteries. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 9 without any new neurological complications or bleeding from a tracheal stoma. TIF is a rare but fatal complication after laryngotracheal separation or tracheostomy. It is important to prevent the onset of TIF, however, there are no criteria for preventive innominate artery transection. Our preventive innominate artery transection through the supra-sternal approach is considered as one of the useful surgical treatment for high-risk cases of TIF accompanied by severe neuromuscular disorders.