1.Brazilian young dental practitioners' use and acceptance of digital radiographic examinations.
Karla ROVARIS ; Karla de Faria VASCONCELOS ; Eduarda Helena Leandro DO NASCIMENTO ; Matheus Lima OLIVEIRA ; Deborah Queiroz FREITAS ; Francisco HAITER-NETO
Imaging Science in Dentistry 2016;46(4):239-244
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use and acceptance of digital radiographic examinations by Brazilian dental practitioners in daily practice and to evaluate the advances that have occurred over the past 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental practitioners enrolled in extension courses at the Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Brazil, responded to a self-administered questionnaire in the years 2011 and 2015. They were asked about sociodemographic factors and their knowledge and use of digital radiographic examinations. Descriptive analysis was performed, as well as the chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with a significance level of 5% (α=0.05). RESULTS: A total of 181 participants responded to the questionnaire in the years 2011 and 2015. Most of the respondents worked in private practice, had graduated within the last 5 years, and were between 20 and 30 years old. In 2011, 55.6% of respondents reported having ever used digital radiographic examinations, while in 2015 this number increased significantly to 85.4% (p<.0001), out of which 71.4% preferred it to conventional images. Moreover, 21.4% of respondents reported having used digital radiographic examinations for more than 3 years. A significant increase in use of intraoral digital radiography (p=0.0316) was observed in 2015. In both years, image quality and high cost were indicated, respectively, as the main advantage and disadvantage of digital radiographic examinations. CONCLUSION: This study showed that digital radiology has become more common in Brazil over the past 5 years. Most of the Brazilian dental practitioners evaluated in 2015 used digital radiographic examinations.
Brazil
;
Dentists
;
General Practice, Dental
;
Humans
;
Private Practice
;
Radiographic Image Enhancement
;
Schools, Dental
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
2.Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal: A study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Eduarda Helena Leandro DO NASCIMENTO ; Maria Luiza DOS ANJOS PONTUAL ; Andréa DOS ANJOS PONTUAL ; Danyel Elias DA CRUZ PEREZ ; José Natal FIGUEIROA ; Marco Antônio Gomes FRAZÃO ; Flávia Maria de Moraes RAMOS-PEREZ
Imaging Science in Dentistry 2016;46(2):69-75
PURPOSE: Sufficient area in the interforaminal region is required for dental implant placement, and the anterior loop of the mandibular canal is located within the limits of this area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and extent of the anterior loop in a Brazilian sample population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images from 250 patients (500 hemimandibles) obtained for various clinical indications were randomly selected and evaluated to determine the presence and length of the anterior loop. The length of the anterior loop was then compared based on gender, age, and the side of the mandible. The data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: An anterior loop was identified in 41.6% of the cases, and its length ranged from 0.25 mm to 4.00 mm (mean, 1.1±0.8 mm). The loop had a greater mean length and was significantly more prevalent in males (p=0.014). No significant differences were found between the right and left sides regarding length (p=0.696) or prevalence (p=0.650). CONCLUSION: In this study, a high prevalence of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal was found, and although its length varied greatly, in most cases it was less than 1 mm long. Although this is a prevalent anatomical variation, safety limits for the placement of implants in this region cannot be established before an accurate evaluation using imaging techniques in order to identify and preserve the neurovascular bundles.
Anatomic Variation
;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*
;
Dental Implants
;
Humans
;
Linear Models
;
Male
;
Mandible
;
Prevalence