Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is replacing conventional manometry in the clinical evaluation of patients with esophageal symptoms, especially dysphagia. The introduction of HRM gave rise to new objective metrics and recognizable patterns of esophageal motor function, requiring a new classification scheme: the Chicago classification. HRM measurements are more detailed and more easily performed compared to conventional manometry. The visual presentation of acquired data improved the analysis and interpretation of esophageal motor function. This led to a more sensitive, accurate, and objective analysis of esophageal motility. In this review we discuss how HRM changed the way we define and categorize esophageal motility disorders. Moreover, we discuss the clinical applications of HRM for each esophageal motility disorder separately.
Classification ; Deglutition Disorders ; Diagnosis* ; Esophageal Achalasia ; Esophageal Motility Disorders* ; Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse ; Humans ; Manometry*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence, relationship between symptoms and esophageal motility disorders, and the factors that could affect in esophageal motility, we performed a manometric study and analyzed the results in a large number of patients with esophageal symptoms. METHODS: Records from 1746 patients referred to our manometric laboratory for evaluation of esophageal symptoms between September 1994 and September 2002 were enrolled. We used low compliance pneumohydraulic capillary infusion system to perform esophageal manometry. RESULTS: Among patients with abnormal esophageal motility, 390 cases of nonspecific esophageal motility disorder, 20 cases of nutcracker esophagus, 11 cases of achalasia, 4 cases of hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, and 4 cases of diffuse esophageal spasm were present. The symptoms of 1746 patients were oropharyngeal dysphagia, esophageal dysphagia, non-cardiac chest pain or chest discomfort, substernal soreness or heartburn, regurgitation, and lump sensation. In multivariate analysis, age (OR=1.95; p=0.007) was an independent factor affecting esophageal motility. CONCLUSIONS: There are esophageal motility disorders in 24.6% of patients with esophageal symptoms, and various symptoms are present in them. The factor associated with the abnormal findings of esophageal manometry is age.
Capillaries ; Chest Pain ; Compliance ; Deglutition Disorders ; Esophageal Achalasia ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Heartburn ; Humans ; Manometry ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prevalence ; Sensation ; Thorax

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Some patients complaining chest pain have normal coronary angiograms. In these cases of noncardiac chest pain, esophageal disease might be a reasonable explanation. However, causal relationship between esophageal motility or reflux disease and chest pain may be difficult to be proven. Therefore, we performed this study to evaluate the esophageal abnormality as a potential cause of noncardiac chest pain. METHODS: We underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal mancenetry and 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring in 58 patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriogram or negative thallium study. RESULTS: Of 58 patients, 17 patients (29.3%) had abnormal esophageal manometry test. There were 6 cases of nonspecific esophageal motility disorder, 5 cases of hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, 5 cases of diffuse esophageal spasm and 1 case of nutcracker esophagus. In 56 patients with 24 hour pH monitoring, 13 patients had positive DeMeester score and 29 patients experienced chest pain during the test period. 11 patients (18.9%) had both positive DeMeester score and chest pain. Mean symptom index of these patients was 70.0% (range 40-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal motility disorders and gastroesophegeal reflux diseases were frequantly found in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Much efforts should be made to find esophageal cause in patients with noncardiac chest pain.
Chest Pain* ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophageal Diseases ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Manometry ; Thallium ; Thorax*

The aim of this study was to assess changes between primary classification of esophageal motility disease and follow-up classification by high resolution manometry (HRM) and to determine whether previously classified diseases could be recategorized according to the updated Chicago Classification published in 2011. We reviewed individual medical records and HRM findings twice for each of 13 subjects. We analyzed primary and follow-up HRM findings based on the original Chicago Classification. We then reclassified the same HRM findings according to the updated Chicago Classification. This case series revealed the variable course of esophageal motility disorders; some patients experienced improvement, whereas others experienced worsening symptoms. Four cases were reclassified from variant achalasia to peristaltic abnormality, one case from diffuse esophageal spasm to type II achalasia and one case from peristaltic abnormality to variant achalasia. Four unclassified findings were recategorized as variant achalasia. In conclusion, esophageal motility disorders are variable and may not be best conceptualized as an independent group. Original classifications can be recategorized according to the updated Chicago Classification system. More research is needed on this topic.
Chicago ; Esophageal Achalasia ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse ; Esophagus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Manometry ; Medical Records

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Globus is a foreign body sense in the throat without dysphagia, odynophagia, esophageal motility disorders, or gastroesophageal reflux. The etiology is unclear. Previous studies suggested that increased upper esophageal sphincter pressure, gastroesophageal reflux and hypertonicity of esophageal body were possible etiologies. This study was to quantify the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, contractile front velocity (CFV), proximal contractile integral (PCI), distal contractile integral (DCI) and transition zone (TZ) in patient with globus gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without globus, and normal controls to suggest the correlation of specific high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings and globus. METHODS: Fifty-seven globus patients, 24 GERD patients and 7 normal controls were studied with HRM since 2009. We reviewed the reports, and selected 5 swallowing plots suitable for analysis in each report, analyzed each individual plot with ManoView. The 5 parameters from each plot in 57 globus patients were compared with that of 24 GERD patients and 7 normal controls. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the UES pressure, CFV, PCI and DCI. TZ (using 30 mmHg isobaric contour) in globus showed significant difference compared with normal controls and GERD patients. The median values of TZ were 4.26 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 2.30-5.85) in globus patients, 5.91 cm (IQR, 3.97-7.62) in GERD patients and 2.26 cm (IQR, 1.22-2.92) in normal controls (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HRM analysis suggested that UES pressure, CFV, PCI and DCI were not associated with globus. Instead increased length of TZ may be correlated with globus. Further study comparing HRM results in globus patients within larger population needs to confirm their correlation.
Deglutition ; Deglutition Disorders ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper ; Gastroesophageal Reflux* ; Humans ; Manometry* ; Pharynx

No abstract available.
Esophageal Motility Disorders* ; Gastroesophageal Reflux*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the factors which are related to the transition from achalasia to diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) or nutcracker esophagus (NE) after botulinum toxin injection to lower esophageal sphincter (LES). METHODS: This study included the 23 patients with achalasia who received an intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin. Stational esophageal manometry, 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry with pH monitoring, barium esophagogram and endoscopic ultrasonography were performed before and after treatment. We analyzed the parameters from these studies between the cases that transformed to DES or NE within a week and the cases that do not transit. RESULT: Five patients (21.7%) transformed to DES (1) or NE (4) within a week. There were significant differences in contraction amplitude of esophageal body (median, 31 mmHg vs 23 mmHg, p < 0.05) and maximal diameter of esophageal body (median, 2.6 cm vs 4.4 cm, p < 0.05) between these five patients and the remaining patients. There were no significant differences in sex, LES pressure and thickness of muscle layer between two groups. CONCLUSION: Factors involved in transition to NE or DES after botulinum toxin injection to LES of achalasia appears as high amplitude contractions in body of esophagus and less dilation of esophageal body.
Barium ; Botulinum Toxins* ; Endosonography ; Esophageal Achalasia* ; Esophageal Motility Disorders* ; Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse* ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Esophagus ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Manometry

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder. Recently, a novel endoscopic technique, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), was introduced as an alternative treatment for achalasia. We report the results and short term outcomes of POEM for patients with achalasia. METHODS: POEM was performed in 13 patients with achalasia. The procedure consisted of creating a submucosal tunnel followed by endoscopic myotomy of circular muscle bundles. The mucosal entry was closed by conventional hemostatic clips. A validated clinical symptom score (Eckardt score) and high resolution manometry were used to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS: Both the clinical score of achalasia, as well as the resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, were significantly reduced after POEM. Mean posttreatment Eckardt score was 0.4+/-0.7, compared to 6.4+/-1.9 prior to the treatment (p=0.001). The mean pretreatment and posttreatment LES pressure was 30.3 and 15.3 mm Hg, respectively (p=0.007). Following POEM, symptomatic relief from dysphagia without reflux symptoms was observed in all patients (13/13). No serious complications related to POEM were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon our initial experience, the authors believe that POEM is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment and may possibly substitute established treatments of refractory achalasia.
Deglutition Disorders ; Esophageal Achalasia ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Humans ; Manometry ; Muscles

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is common in laryngologic practice. In Korea, up to 1 out of every 5 patients who visit otorhinolaryngology clinic is supposed to have LPRD with symptoms and physical findings. Major symptoms of LPRD include hoarseness, cough, reflux symptom and mild dysphagia. Even though LPRD is common, its diagnosis may be difficult, because its symptoms are nonspecific and the laryngeal findings are not always associated with symptom severity. In Recent study, 66.4% of Patient who has LPRD also associated with esophageal motility disorders. Esophageal achalasia is a disease of unknown etiology characterized by an absence of peristalsis in the body of esophagus and nonrelaxing hypertension of the lower esophageal sphincter. Common cause is loss of ganglion cells in Auerbachs plexus. The classic triad of symptoms in achalasia includes dysphagia, regurgitation and weight loss. LPRD and esophageal achalasia have similar symptoms but have different treatment of choice. The Differentiation diagnosis of theses disease is important and should be established by history, radiologic examination and endoscopic examination. We recently assessed a 59-year-old female patient who complained of an epigastric pain, dysphagia and chronic cough. LPRD was initially diagnosed on Laryngoscopic examination and Reflux Symptom Index, but patient was not relieved of any symptoms after treatment of Proton Pump Inhibitor for 3 months. After high resolution manometry, esophageal achalasia was finally diagnosed. We report this case regarding the diagnosis and treatment with review of literatures because we have to think about esophageal motility disorders as a differential diagnosis in laryngology.
Cough ; Deglutition Disorders ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Esophageal Achalasia* ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Esophagus ; Female ; Ganglion Cysts ; Hoarseness ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Korea ; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux* ; Manometry ; Middle Aged ; Myenteric Plexus ; Otolaryngology ; Peristalsis ; Proton Pumps ; Weight Loss

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High resolution manometry (HRM), a newly developed device that uses 36 channels to plot pressure topography of esophagus, has recently been applied to evaluate the esophageal and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) status; however, its definite role in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is not well elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical usefulness of HRM and to elucidate the association between HRM findings and dysphasia in LPRD patients. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: A total of 56 patients who had been diagnosed LPRD from July 2010 to July 2011 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients consisted of 20 men and 36 women, with the mean age of 51.4 years. Every patient performed the questionnaire and HRM examination. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between the HRM results and LPRD. RESULTS: Of 30 patients (53.6%), there were 11 peristaltic dysfunction (19.7%), 6 relaxation impairment of lower esophageal sphincter (LES)(10.7%), 4 diffuse esophageal spasm (7.1%), 4 hypotensive LES (7.1%), 3 Nutcracker esophagus (5.4%), and 2 relaxation impairment of UES (3.6%). The mean distance of UES from the nostril was 17.88+/-2.17 cm and the mean UES basal pressure was 63.10+/-24.49 mm Hg. Differences between the prevalence of abnormal findings shown by HRM and dysphasia symptoms were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In this study, a considerable amount of abnormalities in esophageal function were observed using HRM, and thus we think that HRM could provide useful information about esophagus dysfunction in LPRD patients.
Aphasia ; Esophageal Motility Disorders ; Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse ; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper ; Esophagus ; Female ; Humans ; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux* ; Male ; Manometry* ; Prevalence ; Prospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Relaxation