1.Comparison of multi-slice CT and MRI for liver isolation nodular lesions in cirrhosis patients
Huaiyin DING ; Xiqi ZHU ; Chuanjun XU ; Duxian LIU
Chongqing Medicine 2014;(8):903-906
Objective To compare the efficacy of MRI and multi-slice CT(MSCT) for characterization of liver isolation nodular lesions in cirrhosis patients .Methods A total of 64 patients with 64 lesions ,underwent MSCT and MRI .Chi-square tests were used to compare the performances of MSCT and MRI in characterization of lesions .Results The detection rate ,accuracy ,sensitivity ,spe-cificity ,positive predictive and negative predictie of MSCT and MRI were 76 .56% ,65 .31% ,37 .50% ,78 .79% ,72 .22% ,46 .15%and 87 .50% ,85 .71% ,66 .67% ,97 .14% ,82 .93% ,93 .33% respectively .There were statistical difference in accuracy ,specificity , positie predictie between MSCT and MRI (P< 0 .05) .Conclusion MRI is superior to MSCT in accuracy ,specificity ,and positive predictive for characterization of liver isolation noduler lesions .
2.Clinical and pathological features of cholestatic liver injury
Duxian LIU ; Lanxia LIU ; Yongfeng YANG
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2018;34(11):2283-2288
Major causes of cholestasis include abnormal bile metabolism, obstructed bile flow and regurgitation, and bile duct injury and obstruction. Abnormal bile metabolism is mainly caused by gene abnormality, while obstructed bile flow is often caused by bile duct injury or occlusion due to cholangitis. Abnormal bile metabolism is the most common cause of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), while autoimmune cholangitis is the major cause of bile duct injury. Both congenital/autoimmune bile duct injury and secondary/acquired ductular reaction had relatively specific histopathological changes, and a confirmed diagnosis needs a comprehensive analysis based on clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and genetic examinations. This article elaborates on the research advances in the pathomorphology of autoimmune bile duct injury and PFIC and introduces the similar lesions, in order to provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis of bile duct injury and cholestatic liver diseases.
3.MRI characteristics and pathological correlation regarding the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without cholangiectasis
Huaiyin DING ; Xiaodong SUN ; Xiqi ZHU ; Chao DU ; Juan SHEN ; Qun ZHOU ; Daixin LI ; Chuanjun XU ; Lili YUAN ; Huaihua LI ; Duxian LIU ; Hongshen SONG
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2015;(2):113-116
Objective To studying the MR findings and pathology of peripheral small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and improving the understanding of peripheral small cholangiocarcinoma with no-bile duct dilatation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 12 patients with intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma which were confirmed by surgery and pathology, all patients were examined by abdominal MRI without and with contrast. Correlation was made with gross pathology and surgical pathological specimen. Results On T1WI, there were 4 cases of complex low signal intensity and 8 cases of low signal intensity. On T2WI, there were 8 cases of high signal intensity and 4 cases of complex high signal intensity. Enhanced MRI showed: marked nidus enhancement on arterial phase in 1 case, and the pathological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Inhomogeneous enhancement or annular enhancement were seen in 10 cases on arterial phase, 3 of these cases showed thin annular enhancement on arterial phase, low signalintensity on portal venous phase and isointensity on delayed phase. One case showed delayed enhancement. Thick circular enhancement correlated with pathological changes of survival of tumor cells, center areas correlated with fibrous connective tissue, and a small amount of necrotic tissue. Island-like enhancement or inhomogeneous enhancement were seen in 3 cases. Corresponding pathological changes consisted of tumor tissue and a small amount of fibrous connective tissue, as well as somenecrotic tissue. In 1 case, no enhancement was seen on all three phases and pathological changes showed cystic changes, hemorrhage, necrosis, with survival tumor cells seen between cyst and normal liver tissue. Conclusions MRI scanning of peripheral small cholangiocarcinoma lacked characteristic features, but dynamic contrast-enhanced MR had certain specific findings. Due to different pathology, the fibrous tissue, necrotic tissue and survival tumor tissue components were exhibited different imaging findings.
4. Study on spectrum of UGT1A1 mutations in connection with inherited non-hemolytic unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia
Qingfang XIONG ; Yandan ZHONG ; Xiaoning FENG ; Hui ZHOU ; Duxian LIU ; Xuping WU ; Yongfeng YANG
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2018;26(12):898-902
Objective:
To compare and analyze patient’s general condition, changes in laboratory parameters, and the spectrum of UGT1A1 mutations in patients with inherited non-hemolytic unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia.
Methods:
A retrospective study was conducted at Nanjing Second Hospital from January 2015 to July 2018 and patients’ demographic characteristics, liver function test, and UGT1A1 gene were analyzed. The categorical variable data were compared by
5.Analysis of the relationship between KRT15 and KRT18 protein expression and clinicopathological features and prognosis in colorectal cancer tissue
Junhong MENG ; Mingyue GAO ; Cheng GONG ; Xiaoya ZHANG ; Wenjie SHI ; Duxian LIU
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2024;45(4):435-440
Objective To investigate the relationship between the expression of keratin 15(KRT15)and keratin 18(KRT18)proteins in colorectal cancer tissue and their clinicopathological features and prognosis.Methods A total of 97 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment in a hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 were selected as the study objects.Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the ex-pression of KRT15 and KRT18 protein in colorectal cancer tissues and adjacent tissues,and the differences of KRT15 and KRT18 protein expression in colorectal cancer patients with different clinicopathological features were compared.The patients with colorectal cancer were followed up for 3 years after discharge,and their o-verall survival(OS)during the follow-up period was analyzed.Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Log-rank test were used to analyze the difference in OS rate among colorectal cancer patients with different KRT15 and KRT18 protein expression.Univariate and multivariate COX proportional regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.Results The positive expres-sion rates of KRT15 and KRT18 protein in colorectal cancer tissues were higher than those in adjacent tis-sues,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The positive expression rates of KRT15 and KRT18 protein in colorectal cancer tissues of patients with low differentiation,TNM Ⅲ stage,perineural inva-sion and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)level ≥5 ng/mL were higher than those of patients with medium-high differentiation,TNM Ⅰ-Ⅱ stage,without perineural invasion and preoperative CEA level<5 ng/mL,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The 3-year OS rates of colorectal cancer patients with positive expression of KRT15 and KRT18 protein were 64.29%and 60.00%respectively,which were lower than those of patients with negative expression of KRT15 and KRT18 protein(83.64%and 85.96%respec-tively),and the difference was statistically significant(x2=6.497,7.987,P<0.05).Multivariate COX pro-portional regression analysis showed that TNM stage Ⅲ,positive expression of KRT15 protein and positive expression of KRT18 protein were risk factors affecting the survival of patients with colorectal cancer(P<0.05).Conclusion The expression of KRT15 and KRT18 protein in colorectal cancer tissues can provide ref-erence for prognosis assessment of patients with colorectal cancer.
6. Etiological analysis of hepatopathy of unknown etiology in 470 cases undergoing routine liver biopsy examination
Hongli LIU ; Yongfeng YANG ; Qingfang XIONG ; Yandan ZHONG ; Duxian LIU ; Ping HUANG ; Xiaoning FENG
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2019;27(11):885-889
Objective:
To understand the etiology of hepatopathy of unknown etiology in patients undergoing liver biopsy.
Methods:
Demographic data and pathological examination reports of patients with hepatopathy of unknown etiology who underwent liver biopsy examination at outpatient and inpatient of the Second Hospital of Nanjing between January 2017 and June 2018 were retrospectively collected. All liver histopathological sections combined with clinical and pathological features based on liver biopsy examinations were diagnosed by a reputed clinician and a pathologist.
Results:
A total of 470 cases with hepatopathy of unknown etiology who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled. Of these, 425 cases (90.4%) had a definite diagnosed disease after comprehensive analysis of pathological and clinical data. The diagnosis of hepatopathy of unknown etiology included 11 diseases: 90 cases with autoimmune hepatitis had autoimmune liver disease (19.1%), 38 cases had primary biliary cholangitis (8.1%), 43 cases with overlap syndrome of autoimmune hepatitis had primary biliary cholangitis (9.1%), 118 cases had drug-induced liver injury (25.1%), 75 cases had nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (16.0%), 12 cases had alcoholic liver disease (2.6 cases) %), 15 cases (3.2%) had vascular liver disease, 7 cases (1.5%) had hereditary metabolic liver disease, 5 cases (1.1%) had other systemic diseases, 16 cases (3.4%) had more than two kinds of liver diseases, and 6 cases (1.3%) had others rare liver diseases.
Conclusion
Over 90% cause of the hepatopathy of unknown etiology in the long run can be determined, and the main causes are autoimmune liver disease, drug-induced liver injury, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which needs multidisciplinary cooperation to diagnose, and clinicians need to master the basic and clinical knowledge of liver diseases as well as liver pathology, hepatobiliary imaging, and genetics.
8.Clinical and pathological features of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3
Yuhang WENG ; Qingfang XIONG ; Duxian LIU ; Xulei ZHANG ; Yongfeng YANG
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2022;38(1):154-159
Objective To investigate the clinical and pathological features of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 1326 patients with unexplained liver disease who attended Nanjing Second Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019, among whom 8 patients were diagnosed with PFIC3 based on clinical/pathological manifestation and gene sequencing results (1 patient did not undergo liver biopsy due to contraindication). Clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathological findings were analyzed and a literature review was performed for the pathology of ABCB4-related diseases to summarize the clinical and pathological features of PFIC-3. Results Among the 8 patients with PFIC3, there were 5 male patients and 3 female patients, with a median age of 29.5 years. Of all 8 patients, 4 (50%) manifested as chronic cholestasis and 4 (50%) manifested as biliary cirrhosis, among whom 3 (75%) had the manifestation of portal hypertension. As for biochemical examination, 75% (6/8) had an increase in alkaline phosphatase, and 100% (8/8) had an increase in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. As for imaging examination, 50% (4/8) had cholecystitis, 25% (2/8) had gallstones, 25% (2/8) had bile duct dilatation, 75% (6/8) had splenomegaly, and 25% (2/8) had liver cirrhosis. As for liver biopsy, all 7 patients manifested as bile duct injury and/or reduction, and 57.1% (5/7) had absence of the bile duct. Multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein 3 (MDR3) immunohistochemical staining showed normal expression in 42.9% (3/7) of the patients and reduced expression in 57.1% (4/7) of the patients. Literature review obtained 17 articles with a description of the bile duct or MDR3 immunohistochemistry. Among the 7 patients with low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis, 71.4% (5/7) had normal bile duct, 14.3% (1/7) had bile duct reduction, and 14.3% (1/7) had absence of the bile duct; among the 6 patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, 16.7% (1/6) had normal bile duct, 50% (3/6) had bile duct reduction, and 33.3% (2/6) had absence of the bile duct; among the 8 patients with PFIC3, 25% (2/8) had bile duct reduction and 75% (6/8) had absence of bile duct; among the 21 patients with PFIC3, 9.5% (2/21) had normal expression of MDR3, 23.8% (5/21) had a reduction in the expression of MDR3, and 66.7% (14/21) had absence of the expression of MDR3. Conclusion PFIC3 mainly manifests as cholestasis, cholelithiasis, and hepatic fibrosis. Pathological manifestation includes bile duct injury and bile duct reduction or absence of the bile duct in severe cases, and the degree of injury is associated with disease severity. MDR3 immunohistochemistry may show normal expression, reduced expression, or absence of expression, and diagnosis cannot be excluded in patients with normal expression. Genetic testing can be performed for diagnosis when necessary.