1.Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder in China.
Wen-Yuan WU ; Gang WANG ; Susan G BALL ; Durisala DESAIAH ; Qiu-Qing ANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2011;124(20):3260-3268
BACKGROUNDDuloxetine is approved for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in the United States and elsewhere. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of duloxetine in Chinese patients with GAD.
METHODSThis 9-site study consisted of double-blind treatment for 15 weeks either with duloxetine 60 - 120 mg or with placebo. Patients with at least moderately severe GAD and a Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) global functioning impairment total score ≥ 12 were included in this study. Patients who were randomly assigned to duloxetine received 60 mg for 7 weeks; at that point, for nonresponders the dose was increased to 120 mg for the remaining 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to endpoint on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale score (HADS-A). Secondary efficacy measures included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), the SDS, and pain measures. Safety and tolerability were assessed.
RESULTSBaseline characteristics did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Mean age of the subjects (n = 210) was 37.6 years, 50.5% were female, and 74.3% completed the 15 weeks treatment. Patients treated with duloxetine had significantly greater improvement compared to placebo on the HADS-A (mean change -6.6 vs. -4.9, respectively, P = 0.022). Improvement in anxiety was greater with duloxetine treatment at 7 weeks and continued through 15 weeks for both the HADS-A and the HAMA total score (0.01 ≤ P < 0.05). Compared with placebo, duloxetine was also associated with greater improvement on most secondary measures, but not on the SDS global functioning score. Nausea, dizziness, and somnolence occurred significantly more frequently as treatment-emergent adverse events with duloxetine treatment compared with placebo treatment.
CONCLUSIONSDuloxetine 60 - 120 mg once daily is effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of patients with GAD in China.
Adult ; Antidepressive Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Anxiety Disorders ; drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Duloxetine Hydrochloride ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Thiophenes ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome
2.Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of patients with diabetic neuropathic pain in China.
Yan GAO ; Guang NING ; Wei-Ping JIA ; Zhi-Guang ZHOU ; Zhang-Rong XU ; Zhi-Min LIU ; Chao LIU ; Jian-Hua MA ; Qiang LI ; Lu-Lu CHENG ; Chong-Yuan WEN ; Shu-Yu ZHANG ; Qi ZHANG ; Durisala DESAIAH ; Vladimir SKLJAREVSKI
Chinese Medical Journal 2010;123(22):3184-3192
BACKGROUNDDuloxetine, a selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and approved for the management of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) in the United States, European Union, and many other countries. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in Chinese patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.
METHODSThis double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study treated adult patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 24-hour average pain severity ratings ≥ 4 with duloxetine 60 mg to 120 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Dose adjustments of duloxetine or matching placebo were based upon investigator's judgment of clinical response. Change from baseline to endpoint in BPI average pain was the primary efficacy outcome. Secondary outcome measures included BPI-severity and -Interference, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Clinical Global Impressions of Severity, EuroQol: 5 Dimensions, Athens Insomnia Scale, and safety measures.
RESULTSOf 215 patients randomized, 88.4% and 82.1% of patients in placebo and duloxetine groups, respectively, completed the study. Mean change from baseline to endpoint in BPI average pain was not statistically different between the treatment groups (P = 0.124). Duloxetine- treated patients showed significantly greater pain reduction compared with those in placebo group at weeks 1, 2, and 4 (P = 0.004, P = 0.009, and P = 0.006, respectively), but not at weeks 8 (P = 0.125) and 12 (P = 0.107). Duloxetine-treated patients experienced statistically significant improvement in Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Clinical Global Impression of Severity, area under the curve for pain relief, BPI-severity pain right now, and BPI-interference walking ability. Patients treated with duloxetine 120 mg once daily showed significantly greater pain reduction on the Brief Pain Inventory average pain score relative to placebo. Duloxetine-treated patients reported nausea, somnolence, anorexia, and dysuria significantly more than placebo.
CONCLUSIONSAlthough the primary study endpoint was not achieved, the overall observed response pattern suggests the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of Chinese patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The safety profile for duloxetine is similar to that reported in other global trials.
Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Diabetic Neuropathies ; drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Duloxetine Hydrochloride ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Placebos ; Thiophenes ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome