Objective: To explore the influence of the lower extremity abnormal alignment and the joint surface, and to explore the surgical skills. Methods: Twenty-two cases of tibial plateau Schatzker Ⅵ fracture internal fixation failure revision from January 2012 to January 2017 in Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai 10^th Hospital.One year follow-up after initial surgery to make sure of failure.Three-dimensional CT scan, radiography, infection index, gait analysis, knee joint ROM, femur tibia angle, tibial plateau tibial shaft angle and posterior slope if tibial plateau were observed. The medial approach and bi-planer osteotoma were used.Autogenous iliac bone graft, postoperative fast recovery channel were used.Follow-up point included preoperative and postoperative 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.Obvervational index included double lower limbs radiography, knee society score(KSS), complications such as infection, skin necrosis, joint main passive activity, double lower limbs alignment the last follow-up SF-36 scale.Rate was compared by χ² test, measurement data using paired sample t test.Correlation was analyzed by Pearson correlation regression testing. Results: Twenty-two patients received follow-up.KSS, more than 21 cases were benign, with good gait.One case was poor, with claudication gait.Not skin necrosis, no deep infection cases, 1 case get blisters 2 days postoperatively, and disappear after 5 days with detumescence and cold therapy.Whether restoring force line affect the KSS significantly(χ²=22.000, P=0.000). Knee joint ROM, SF-36 score, KSS and lower limb alignment were improved significantly. In different individual the articular surface and anatomical angle recovered greatly but the posterior slope angle was quite difference which has no correlation with KSS and SF-36 scale(P>0.01). Conclusions Revision of Schatzker type Ⅵ tibial plateau fracture failure should focus on the recovery of lower limb alignment.moderate overcorrect bone cutting and joint surface height can bring benefits to the postoperative knee function.Revision surgery patients have greater psychological pressure, more early psychological intervention is necessary.

Objective To investigate the effect of tumor-associated macrophage exosomes on glycolysis of pancreatic cancer cells and its mechanism.Methods The THP-1 cells were induced to differentiate into the M0 and M2 macrophages,and the exosomes(M0 exo and M2 exo)were extracted.The pancreatic cancer cells CAPAN-2 and ASPC-1 were divided into the PBS group,the M0 exo group,the M2 exo group and the M2 exo+siKRAS group,and co-incubated with equal volumes of PBS,10 μg/mL of M0 exo,10 μg/mL of M2 exo,and transfection of KRAS siRNA and 10 μg/mL of M2 exo,respectively.Transmission electron microscopy was used to observe the structure of exosomes;CCK-8 was used to detect the cell proliferation capacity;the kit was used to detect the glucose uptake rate and production level of lactic acid,and Western blot was used to detect the exosome markers expression,KRAS protein expression and ERK1/2 phosphorylation level.Results THP-1 was induced to differentiate into M2 macrophages expressing Arg-1 and IL-10 marker proteins.M0 exo and M2 exo had a bilayer membrane structure with a particle size of about 100 nm and expressed exosomal marker proteins of CD9,CD81,and TSG101.Compared with the PBS group,the cell proliferation,glucose uptake rate,production level of lactic acid of CAPAN-2 and ASPC-1 cells in the M2 exo group increased significantly(P<0.05),and the KRAS expression and ERK1/2 phosphorylation level were significantly increased(P<0.001).Compared with the M2 exo group,the proliferation,glucose uptake rate and production level of lactic acid of CAPAN-2 and ASPC-1 cells in the M2 exo+siKRAS group decreased significantly(P<0.05).Conclusion Tumor-associated macrophage exosomes can promote the glycolysis of pancreatic cancer cells via the activation of KRAS signaling pathway.

Objective:To examine the location and the reparative impact of iatrogenic ureteral injury.Methods:Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients with iatrogenic ureteral injury admitted from May 2019 to May 2022. The median age of the patients was 39 years. The injuries were predominantly on the left side in 26 patients (60.5%), in addition, there were 16 patients (37.2%) on the right side, and 1 patient on(2.3%)bilateral sides. The types of injuries were upper ureteral (8 patients, 18.6%), middle ureteral (8 patients, 18.6%), and lower ureteral (27 patients, 62.8%). The average injury length was 5.9 cm with a standard deviation of 2.4.During intraoperative diagnosis, 7 cases were found to have damage, transection, or ligation of the ureteral luminal structure. Surgical areas displayed extensive exudation and the presence of adipose tissue was observed during ureteroscopy. There were 36 cases manifested symptoms such as lumbar and abdominal pain (13 cases), fever (12 cases), peritoneal irritation sign (9 cases), vaginal discharge (9 cases), or hematuria (5 cases). Among these cases, 10 showed contrast agent spillage on urinary enhanced CT or intravenous urography, while 27 exhibited hydronephrosis or ureteral dilatation. Additionally, one case presented a renal tumor on the affected side, and creatinine examination was performed on drainage fluid in 7 cases. Furthermore, a unilateral renal nonfunction was identified in 1 case through renal ECT examination.Results:Out of the 43 patients followed up for a median of 18 months (range 11-47), 41 patients had no urinary symptoms such as hematuria, urine extravasation, or hypochondriac pain. Their urine tests (routine, urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine) were normal. Thirteen patients showed mild hydronephrosis on urinary ultrasonography, which remained stable during the follow-up period. One patient experienced restenosis at the ureterovesical anastomosis after renal autograft transplantation, but symptoms improved after balloon dilatation. Another patient underwent nephrostomy puncture and was found to have a clamped left ureteral end and a fistula in the sigmoid colon. This patient successfully underwent bilateral ureteroneocystostomy with a bladder flap and had a positive postoperative outcome.Conclusions:Iatrogenic ureteral injuries occur at seven specific sites, with gynecological surgeries posing a higher risk of injury at the ureter and external iliac artery, pelvic infundibulum ligament, and uterine artery intersection or adjacent areas. Similarly, colorectal surgeries can result in injury at the parallel segment of the ureter and mesenteric vessels, colon adjacent region, and vas deferens intersection. Urological surgeries are more likely to cause injury at the intersection of the ureter and external iliac artery, as well as the ureteropelvic junction.When treating ureteral injuries, it is important to consider the cause, location, and length of the injury. For short and deep injuries, options such as ureteral anastomosis or ureterovesical anastomosis may be considered. In cases of longer injuries, alternatives like renal autograft transplantation, ureteral surgery involving other tissues, or techniques such as the Boari flap or buccal/oral mucosal transplantation can be explored. The primary focus during repair surgeries should be on achieving tension-free anastomosis while maintaining sufficient blood supply to the ureter and placing it in an area with better blood circulation.