2.A Case of a Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in the Minor Papilla.
Dong Woo HA ; Gwang Ha KIM ; Dong Uk KIM ; Min Jung BAE ; Bo Won KIM ; Hye Kyung JEON ; Do Yun PARK ; Hyung Il SEO
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2011;58(3):144-148
Neuroendocrine tumors are usually found in the ileum, appendix, rectum, colon and stomach. Ampullary neuroendocrine tumor is extremely rare and only a few cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the minor papilla have been reported. The preoperative diagnosis is very challenging because either asymptomatic or manifests as nonspecific abdominal pain. The tumor is relatively small and located at the deep mucosa and submucosa. Endoscopy with deep biopsy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography are good diagnostic tools. The best therapeutic choice is surgery. We report an unusual case of a 55-year-old woman who underwent endoscopy as part of a regular health checkup and was diagnosed a neuroendocrine carcinoma in the minor papilla, which was successfully resected by pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/*diagnosis/pathology/ultrasonography
;
Duodenal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/ultrasonography
;
Duodenoscopy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.Values of endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis and treatment of duodenal protruding lesions.
Guo-qiang XU ; Yi-qun WU ; Li-jun WANG ; Hong-tan CHEN
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2008;9(4):329-334
OBJECTIVEThe diagnoses of patients with duodenal protruding lesions are difficult when using conventional examinations such as computed tomography (CT) and conventional endoscope etc. Thus, we investigated the clinical value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with miniature ultrasonic probes on the diagnosis and treatment of duodenal protruding lesions.
METHODSPatients with duodenal protruding lesions who were indicated for EUS were examined by EUS with 12 approximately 15 MHz miniature ultrasonic probes and double-cavity electronic endoscope. According to diagnosis of EUS, those patients were indicated for biopsy and treatment received biopsy, endoscopic resection or surgical excision. The postoperative histological results were compared with the preoperative diagnosis of EUS. Those patients without endoscopic resection or surgical excision were periodically followed up with EUS.
RESULTSA total of 169 patients with duodenal protruding lesions were examined by EUS, of which 40 were diagnosed with cysts, 36 with inflammatory protruding or polyp, 25 with Brunner's gland adenoma, 19 with ectopic pancreas, 17 with gastrointestinal stromal tumor, 12 with extrinsic compression, 12 with minor papilla, 6 with lipoma, 1 with adenocarcinoma and 1 with lymphoma. After EUS examinations, 75 patients received biopsy, endoscopic resection or surgical excision respectively. The postoperative histological results of 70 patients were completely consistent with the preoperative diagnosis of EUS, with 93.33% diagnostic accuracy. The results of follow-up with EUS indicated that duodenal cyst, Brunner's gland adenoma, ectopic pancreas, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and lipoma remained unchanged within 1 approximately 3 years. No related complications occurred among all patients that received EUS examinations.
CONCLUSIONEUS is an effective and reliable diagnostic method for duodenal protruding lesions.
Adult ; Aged ; Digestive System Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; Duodenal Diseases ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; Duodenum ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Endoscopy ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography ; methods