T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domain (TIGIT) is a newly discovered immune checkpoint molecule, mainly expressed on the surface of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. By binding to cluster of differentiation 155 (CD155) and other ligands, it inhibits T cell and NK cell-mediated immune responses and affects the tumor microenvironment. Multiple preclinical studies have demonstrated that the TIGIT/CD155 pathway plays a role in a variety of solid and hematological tumors. Clinical trials investigating TIGIT inhibitors alone or in combination with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for lung cancer are currently underway.
.
Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Immunotherapy ; Thorax ; Immunologic Factors ; Receptors, Immunologic ; Tumor Microenvironment

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can achieve good disease control, but it will inevitably produce drug resistance. About 3%-10% of the resistance mechanism is small cell transformation. Two cases of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation were reported and the disease was controlled after EGFR-TKIs treatment. In case 1, progression-free survival (PFS) before small cell carcinoma transformation was 16 months, and in case 2, PFS before small cell carcinoma transformation was 24 months. Subsequent biopsy after disease progression indicated a shift to small cell lung cancer. Case 1 PFS after small cell carcinoma transformation was 6 months, and case 2 PFS after small cell carcinoma transformation was 8 months, and overall survival (OS) was 36 months, which significantly prolonged the patient's survival. At the same time, the literature of such drug resistance mutations was reviewed. For patients with advanced NSCLC with sensitive mutations, it is necessary to conduct secondary histopathological tests after TKIs treatment resistance, and select subsequent treatment according to different resistance mechanisms for the whole course of disease management.
.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Small Cell ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics* ; Lung Neoplasms/genetics* ; Adenocarcinoma/genetics* ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/genetics* ; ErbB Receptors/genetics*

The incidence of lung cancer is high worldwide, and lung cancer is the leading cause of death from malignant tumors in both men and women. Early diagnosis of lung cancer can significantly improve the patient's prognosis. Therefore, searching for specific markers to assist in the early diagnosis of lung cancer is urgent question. Exosomes are nano-sized microvesicles and contain various biomaterial, including nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. Exosomes are important carriers of these biomaterial, serve important roles in intracellular communications and signal transduction among tissues. Due to its unique enrichment mechanism, it has the stability and specificity as a biomarker. Exosomes are not only involved in the formation of tumor microenvironment and new blood vessels in lung cancer, but also involved in chemotherapy, targeted therapy response and prognosis assessment. Many research advances bring new hope for prolonging the survival of lung cancer patients. This article reviews the value of exosome specific protein and microRNA (miRNA) in lung cancer in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The clinical features of patients with common single-mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well characterized. There is a high adenocarcinoma incidence rate among female patients with none or shorter smoking history. Those patients have higher objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, it is still unclear that the clinical features of patients with EGFR double mutation and the sensitivity towards EGFR-TKIs treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,238 primary NSCLC patients who had EGFR gene testing in Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 and identified 603 patients with single mutation and 59 patients with double mutation. All genes were uniformly detected by using ARMS-PCR technology. We analyze the gene of 32 double-mutant patients with specific genotyping, and randomly selected 60 patients with single mutation and compared the clinical features with 59 patients with double mutation. Furthermore, we examined the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs treatment in lung cancer patients with double mutation and single mutation in EGFR. RESULTS: The rare single mutation gene is the most common in patients with double mutation of EGFR. There is no significant statistical difference in gender, smoking history, age, pathological type or tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging among patients with single and double EGFR mutantion. In the double mutation patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, the objective response rate was 36.80%, the disease control rate was 68.40%. The objective response rate was 60.00% and the disease control rate was 90.00% in the patients with single mutation. However, overall PFS was significantly higher in EGFR single mutation patients (P=0.003), with median PFS of 12.0 months compared with 6.0 months in EGFR double mutation patients. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference between the clinical features of patients with EGFR double mutation and single mutation. Patients with EGFR double mutation is associated with poor survival underwent the first generation of EGFR-TKIs treatment compared with patients with a single mutation.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; genetics ; ErbB Receptors ; antagonists & inhibitors ; genetics ; Exons ; genetics ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; genetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Severe asthma stands as a formidable contributor to both mortality and morbidity of patients suffering asthma, casting substantial social and economic shadows on communities. As our understanding of asthma's pathophysiology deepens, a beacon of hope emerges in the form of biological targeted therapies, offering a promising avenue for the management of this challenging condition. These therapies, by precisely inhibiting or modulating pivotal molecules in the inflammatory cascade, offer potential benefits in symptom alleviation, lung function enhancement, and risk reduction of acute exacerbations. They signify a paradigm shift in severe asthma treatment. Within the confines of this article, we embark on a systematic exploration of the immunological underpinnings that define severe asthma. By delving into the intricacies of the immune system's role in exacerbating this condition, we aim to offer a comprehensive assessment of both the current landscape and the future prospects of biological therapies. Our objective is to provide a scientifically robust and valuable reference that can guide the individualized treatment of patients grappling with severe asthma.