Erdheim Chester disease (ECD) is very rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) which occurs in the skeletal system and multiple organs. As it is progressive, sometimes it causes fatal results. However, it is often misdiagnosed as LCH or multiple bone metastasis and, thus, is very difficult to diagnose. In Korea, only 10 cases were first reported in 1999. In particular, there have been a few orthopedic approaches or reports in English-speaking literatures, and no report has been issued in Korea. The authors performed bone biopsy in patients with knee and lower extremity pain who were referred for the integrated treatment. We attempts to report this diagnosis experience with literature review.
Biopsy ; Erdheim-Chester Disease ; Histiocytosis ; Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell ; Humans ; Knee ; Korea ; Lower Extremity ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Orthopedics

PURPOSE: This descriptive - comparison study was conducted to investigate the critical thinking disposition of senior nursing students in three types of nursing program. Method: The convenience sample was drawn from 472 nursing students. Instruments used in this study were made California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory developed by Facione & Facione (1994). Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test with SAS 6.12 program. RESULTS: 1. The total mean score of critical thinking disposition was 279.06. Inquisitiveness was the highest with an mean score 45.50, while systematicity was the lowest with mean score of 36.15. There was a statistically significant difference in critical thinking disposition(F=14.36, p=.00)according to senior nursing students in three types of nursing programs. 2. There was a statistically significant difference in critical thinking disposition(F=5.53, p=.00) according to age, marital status(t=-3.15, p=.00), religion(F=3.26, p=.02) and critical thinking course taken previously(t=3.10, p=.00). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in critical thinking disposition(F=14.36, p=.00) according to senior nursing students in three types of nursing program. There was a statistically significant difference in Critical thinking disposition according to age, marital status, religion, logic, philosophy, critical thinking course.
California ; Humans ; Logic ; Marital Status ; Nursing ; Philosophy ; Students, Nursing ; Thinking*

PURPOSE: This descriptive - comparison study was conducted to investigate the critical thinking disposition of senior nursing students in three types of nursing program. Method: The convenience sample was drawn from 472 nursing students. Instruments used in this study were made California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory developed by Facione & Facione (1994). Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test with SAS 6.12 program. RESULTS: 1. The total mean score of critical thinking disposition was 279.06. Inquisitiveness was the highest with an mean score 45.50, while systematicity was the lowest with mean score of 36.15. There was a statistically significant difference in critical thinking disposition(F=14.36, p=.00)according to senior nursing students in three types of nursing programs. 2. There was a statistically significant difference in critical thinking disposition(F=5.53, p=.00) according to age, marital status(t=-3.15, p=.00), religion(F=3.26, p=.02) and critical thinking course taken previously(t=3.10, p=.00). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in critical thinking disposition(F=14.36, p=.00) according to senior nursing students in three types of nursing program. There was a statistically significant difference in Critical thinking disposition according to age, marital status, religion, logic, philosophy, critical thinking course.
California ; Humans ; Logic ; Marital Status ; Nursing ; Philosophy ; Students, Nursing ; Thinking*

PURPOSE: The purposes of this methodologic paper are to (1) describe theoretical background in conducting research across different cultures; (2) address measurement issues related to instrument administration; and (3) provide strategies to deal with measurement issues. METHODS: A thorough review of the literature was conducted. A theoretical background is provided, and examples of administering instrument in studies are described. RESULTS: When applying an instrument to different cultures, both equivalence and bias need to be established. Three levels of equivalence, i.e., construct equivalence, measurement unit equivalence, and full score comparability, need to be explained to maintain the same concept being measured. In this paper, sources of bias in construct, method, and item are discussed. Issues related to instrument administration in a cross-cultural study are described. CONCLUSION: Researchers need to acknowledge various group differences in concept and/or language that include a specific set of symbols and norms. There is a need to question the philosophical and conceptual appropriateness of an assessment measure that has been conceptualized and operationalized in a different culture. Additionally, testing different response formats such as narrowing response range can be considered to reduce bias.
Attitude of Health Personnel/ethnology ; Attitude to Health/ethnology ; Bias (Epidemiology) ; Communication Barriers ; *Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Data Collection/*methods/standards ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic/methods/standards ; Nursing Assessment ; Nursing Research/*methods/standards ; Philosophy, Nursing ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design/standards ; Researcher-Subject Relations/psychology ; Transcultural Nursing/*methods/standards ; Translating

No abstract available.
Leydig Cell Tumor*

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define and clarify the concept of 'resilience' in patients with cardiovascular diseases. METHODS: A hybrid model was used to develop the concept of resilience. The model included a field study carried out in Cheonan, Korea. The participants in this study were 9 patients with cardiovascular diseases who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention. RESULTS: The concept of resilience was found to be a complex phenomenon having meanings in two dimensions: the personal-dispositional and interpersonal dimensions. Four attributes and seven indicators were defined. CONCLUSION: A resilient person was defined as one who has a positive attitude toward restoration, the power to reconstruct and control his/her disease (personal dimension), and support from a supportive system with supportive persons (interpersonal dimension). In the clinical setting, resilience plays an important role in managing the care plans of cardiovascular patients. Therefore, nurses who work closely with patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases should be aware of the attributes and indicators of resilience to enhance the resilience of their patients.
Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Attitude to Health ; Cardiovascular Diseases/*psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Resilience, Psychological

No abstract available.
Krukenberg Tumor*

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the effects of new nurses’ critical thinking disposition and safety climate on medication safety competence. Methods: The subjects of this study were 141 new nurses working in a tertiary general hospital in Seoul, Korea. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires from May 23 to June 30, 2024 and were analyzed using SPSS Statistics/WIN 28.0, including descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Medication safety competence was significantly related to critical thinking disposition (r=.53, p<.001) and safety climate (r=.46, p<.001). Critical thinking disposition (β=.38, p<.001), safety climate (β=.29, p<.001), and clinical experience (β=.28, p<.001) were factors influencing medication safety competence among new nurses and the explanatory power of the model was explained 37.0%. Conclusion Critical thinking disposition, safety climate, and clinical experience affected new nurses’ medication safety competence. Therefore, enhancing critical thinking disposition and fostering a safety-oriented organizational culture can be essential for improving the medication safety competence of new nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the effects of new nurses’ critical thinking disposition and safety climate on medication safety competence. Methods: The subjects of this study were 141 new nurses working in a tertiary general hospital in Seoul, Korea. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires from May 23 to June 30, 2024 and were analyzed using SPSS Statistics/WIN 28.0, including descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Medication safety competence was significantly related to critical thinking disposition (r=.53, p<.001) and safety climate (r=.46, p<.001). Critical thinking disposition (β=.38, p<.001), safety climate (β=.29, p<.001), and clinical experience (β=.28, p<.001) were factors influencing medication safety competence among new nurses and the explanatory power of the model was explained 37.0%. Conclusion Critical thinking disposition, safety climate, and clinical experience affected new nurses’ medication safety competence. Therefore, enhancing critical thinking disposition and fostering a safety-oriented organizational culture can be essential for improving the medication safety competence of new nurses.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the effects of new nurses’ critical thinking disposition and safety climate on medication safety competence. Methods: The subjects of this study were 141 new nurses working in a tertiary general hospital in Seoul, Korea. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires from May 23 to June 30, 2024 and were analyzed using SPSS Statistics/WIN 28.0, including descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Medication safety competence was significantly related to critical thinking disposition (r=.53, p<.001) and safety climate (r=.46, p<.001). Critical thinking disposition (β=.38, p<.001), safety climate (β=.29, p<.001), and clinical experience (β=.28, p<.001) were factors influencing medication safety competence among new nurses and the explanatory power of the model was explained 37.0%. Conclusion Critical thinking disposition, safety climate, and clinical experience affected new nurses’ medication safety competence. Therefore, enhancing critical thinking disposition and fostering a safety-oriented organizational culture can be essential for improving the medication safety competence of new nurses.