No abstract available.
Rectal Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Rectal Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Common Bile Duct*

Although many kinds of operation for rectal prolapse exist, generally they could be divided into the transabdominal and transperineal approach. The former has low recurrence rate as compared with the latter, but needs laparotomy. Unfortunately, many patients with rectal prolapse are old and debilitated. So they are not suitable candidates for a major abdominal operation. For those patient, a transperineal method may be proper, but the recurrence rate may be high and continence is not always achieved. We reviewed 12 patients who were older than 70 years of age and treated by the Thiersch operation among the 52 cases of rectal prolapse from Feb. 1992 to Mar. 1997 at Kwangju Christian Hospital. The results were summarized as follows; 1) The male to female ratio was 1 : 1.4. 2) Durations of rectal prolapse were distributed from 6 months to 30 years. Seven cases had duration of longer than 10 years. 3) The preoperative incidence of incontience was 8 (67%) of 12 cases. Among the 8 patients with incontinence, the male was 3 (37.5%) and female was 5 (62.5%). 4) Postoperative review of incontinence revealed complete disappearance in 4 cases (50%), improvement in 3 cases (37.5%), and no improvement in 1 case (12.5%). 5) After the Thiersch operation, rectal prolapse recurred in only 1 of the 12 cases (8.3%), a wound infection developed in 1 case (8.3%), defecation difficulty due to the small Thiersch ring was present in 3 cases (25%). The results of this study show that the Thiersch operation may be an effective method in treating rectal prolapse, especially in patient who are old or have poor general condition and manifested incontinence.
Defecation ; Female ; Gwangju ; Humans ; Incidence ; Laparotomy ; Male ; Rectal Prolapse* ; Recurrence ; Wound Infection

No abstract available.
Child* ; Humans ; Korea*

From January 1993 to December 1995, 47 patients with rectal carcinomas underwent a rectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique at the Surgical Department of Kwang-ju Christian Hospital. The major advantages of the double stapling technique for lower rectal cancer over the single stapling technique or a hand-sewn operation are as follows:1) Insertion of a purse-string suture is eliminated, and application of a linear stapler to close the distal rectum may be performed with greater ease. 2) In addition, fecal contamination and spillage of tumor cells from the rectal segment are minimized. 3) Differences in the sizes of the colons and rectums are not a concern in constructing the anastomosis. 4) The operating time is shorter. The following results were obtained by a comparison with 24 patients with rectal carcinoma who had undergone a rectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique from January 1989 to December 1992 which was reported in a previous study:1) Anastomotic stenosis was decreased from 8.3% to 4.2% because of reduced ischemia due to the double row of staples and the reduced injury due to compression of tissue between the anvil and the cartridge with experience. In addition, it resulted from reduced tension of the anastomosis due to sufficients mobilization of the proximal colon and from selection of large cartridge (33 mm). 2) Anastomotic leakage, even though the same location as the tumor and in the advanced age group, was decreased from 4.2% to 0% because the blood circulation was maintained and unnecessary tension was reduced with experience. In addition, it resulted from reinforced suture of the anastomotic site which was performed after anastomosis. 3) Systemic recurrence was the same result as that of the previous study(4.2/4.3%). 4) Local recurrence, even though at the same distal distance from the margin of the cancer, was increased from 0% to 2.1% because of advancing the pathologic stage (B2, C1>B1, B2) and increasing the poorly differentiated pathologic type.
Anastomotic Leak ; Blood Circulation ; Colon ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Gwangju ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Rectum ; Recurrence ; Sutures

From January 1993 to December 1995, 47 patients with rectal carcinomas underwent a rectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique at the Surgical Department of Kwang-ju Christian Hospital. The major advantages of the double stapling technique for lower rectal cancer over the single stapling technique or a hand-sewn operation are as follows:1) Insertion of a purse-string suture is eliminated, and application of a linear stapler to close the distal rectum may be performed with greater ease. 2) In addition, fecal contamination and spillage of tumor cells from the rectal segment are minimized. 3) Differences in the sizes of the colons and rectums are not a concern in constructing the anastomosis. 4) The operating time is shorter. The following results were obtained by a comparison with 24 patients with rectal carcinoma who had undergone a rectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique from January 1989 to December 1992 which was reported in a previous study:1) Anastomotic stenosis was decreased from 8.3% to 4.2% because of reduced ischemia due to the double row of staples and the reduced injury due to compression of tissue between the anvil and the cartridge with experience. In addition, it resulted from reduced tension of the anastomosis due to sufficients mobilization of the proximal colon and from selection of large cartridge (33 mm). 2) Anastomotic leakage, even though the same location as the tumor and in the advanced age group, was decreased from 4.2% to 0% because the blood circulation was maintained and unnecessary tension was reduced with experience. In addition, it resulted from reinforced suture of the anastomotic site which was performed after anastomosis. 3) Systemic recurrence was the same result as that of the previous study(4.2/4.3%). 4) Local recurrence, even though at the same distal distance from the margin of the cancer, was increased from 0% to 2.1% because of advancing the pathologic stage (B2, C1>B1, B2) and increasing the poorly differentiated pathologic type.
Anastomotic Leak ; Blood Circulation ; Colon ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Gwangju ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Rectum ; Recurrence ; Sutures

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of malignant obstruction of the left colon and rectum is controversial. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 33 patients who underwent one-stage operation(n=11), staged operation(n=20), and palliative colostomy(n=2) at Kwangju Christian Hospital between January 1992 and December 1996. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent one-stage operations(7 cases with anterior resection, 3 cases with left hemicolectomy, 1 case with Miles' operation). In this group, postoperative morbidity was 36.3% including 1 wound infection(9.0%), 1 anastomotic leakage (9.0%), 1 postoperative intestinal obstruction and 1 pulmonary complication, but there was no postoperative death. The average of hospital stay in this group was 18.1 days and the first day of normal diet was 6.0 days. Twenty patients underwent staged operations including 12 cases of Hartmann's procedure. In this group, postoperative morbidity was 35.0% including 3 wound infections(15.0%), 2 pulmonary complications(10.0%), 1 parastomal hernia and 1 fistula. There were two postoperative deaths as a result of sepsis. The average of hospital stay in this group was 34.9 days and the first day of normal diet was 6.8 days. CONCLUSION: We believe that one-stage operation was of value in management of malignant obstruction of the left colon and rectum in selected patients.
Anastomotic Leak ; Colon* ; Diet ; Fistula ; Gwangju ; Hernia ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction ; Length of Stay ; Rectum* ; Retrospective Studies ; Sepsis ; Wounds and Injuries

PURPOSE: Early detection of appendicitis has increased due to development of computed tomography and ultrasonography, yet we are frequently meeting complicated appendicitis, including perforation, abscess and a gangrenous appendicitis due to delayed diagnosis. For that reason, we want to evaluate predictive factors for the complicated appendicitis. METHODS: A total of 128 patients with appendicitis, after 13 patients with a duration of under 12 hours and 15 patients with pathological non-appendicitis were excluded from 156 patients, who visited Kwangju Christian Hospital from November 2008 to November 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: There were 62 patients (48.3%) with simple appendicitis and 66 patients (51.7%) with complicated appendicitis. In univariate analysis, age (P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (P < 0.001) and the diameter of the appendix (P = 0.006), were found to be significant. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that C-reactive protein was an independent predictor for complicated appendicitis (odds ratio, 1.371; 95% confidence interval, 1.155 to 1.628; P < 0.001). The cut-off value of C-reactive protein was set at 7.05 mg/dL by using receiver operating characteristic curve (0.805; sensitivity, 57.6%; specificity, 98.3%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that if C-reactive protein is above 7.05 mg/dL, immediate and proper management should be performed due to a high probability of complicated appendicitis, especially in young children or elderly patients who frequently present with vague symptoms.
Abscess ; Aged ; Appendicitis ; Appendix ; C-Reactive Protein ; Child ; Delayed Diagnosis ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Though acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical conditions, the diagnosis in patients with equivocal signs can be difficult. Many patients with suspected appendicitis are admitted for observation. We designed this study to investigate whether the Alvarado score can be used as an admission criterion. METHODS: This is a prospective study comprising consecutive patients who attended the emergency room with right lower abdominal pain from January 2007 to March 2007. Patients were scored with the Alvarado score and if they were admitted, had a second scoring in the ward. Patients who were not admitted were told to attend the clinic the next day and patients who did not attend the clinic were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Total of 132 patients (M=83, F=49) were included and 105 patients were admitted for observation. Eighty-seven patients had surgery with the intention to treat appendicitis and 10 patients did not have appendicitis. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was highly accurate for an Alvarado score above 6 (90.9%). Patients with a score 4 or less in the ward as well as in the emergency room did not have appendicitis. Of the patients with appendicitis, 49% (38/77) had higher scores in the ward than initial score at the emergency room. CONCLUSIONS: None of the patients with a score of 4 or less had appendicitis. They did not need admission. The Alvarado score can be used as an admission criterion in patients with suspected appendicitis.
Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis/*diagnosis/surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Admission/standards ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index