1.Clinical Trial Protocol for Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation in South Korea
Byung-Joon KIM ; Jun-Seop SHIN ; Byoung-Hoon MIN ; Jong-Min KIM ; Chung-Gyu PARK ; Hee-Jung KANG ; Eung Soo HWANG ; Won-Woo LEE ; Jung-Sik KIM ; Hyun Je KIM ; Iov KWON ; Jae Sung KIM ; Geun Soo KIM ; Joonho MOON ; Du Yeon SHIN ; Bumrae CHO ; Heung-Mo YANG ; Sung Joo KIM ; Kwang-Won KIM
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1160-1168
Background:
Islet transplantation holds promise for treating selected type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, yet the scarcity of human donor organs impedes widespread adoption. Porcine islets, deemed a viable alternative, recently demonstrated successful longterm survival without zoonotic risks in a clinically relevant pig-to-non-human primate islet transplantation model. This success prompted the development of a clinical trial protocol for porcine islet xenotransplantation in humans.
Methods:
A single-center, open-label clinical trial initiated by the sponsor will assess the safety and efficacy of porcine islet transplantation for diabetes patients at Gachon Hospital. The protocol received approval from the Gachon Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) under the Investigational New Drug (IND) process. Two diabetic patients, experiencing inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin treatment and frequent hypoglycemic unawareness, will be enrolled. Participants and their family members will engage in deliberation before xenotransplantation during the screening period. Each patient will receive islets isolated from designated pathogen-free pigs. Immunosuppressants and systemic infection prophylaxis will follow the program schedule. The primary endpoint is to confirm the safety of porcine islets in patients, and the secondary endpoint is to assess whether porcine islets can reduce insulin dose and the frequency of hypoglycemic unawareness.
Conclusion
A clinical trial protocol adhering to global consensus guidelines for porcine islet xenotransplantation is presented, facilitating streamlined implementation of comparable human trials worldwide.
2.Clinical Trial Protocol for Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation in South Korea
Byung-Joon KIM ; Jun-Seop SHIN ; Byoung-Hoon MIN ; Jong-Min KIM ; Chung-Gyu PARK ; Hee-Jung KANG ; Eung Soo HWANG ; Won-Woo LEE ; Jung-Sik KIM ; Hyun Je KIM ; Iov KWON ; Jae Sung KIM ; Geun Soo KIM ; Joonho MOON ; Du Yeon SHIN ; Bumrae CHO ; Heung-Mo YANG ; Sung Joo KIM ; Kwang-Won KIM
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1160-1168
Background:
Islet transplantation holds promise for treating selected type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, yet the scarcity of human donor organs impedes widespread adoption. Porcine islets, deemed a viable alternative, recently demonstrated successful longterm survival without zoonotic risks in a clinically relevant pig-to-non-human primate islet transplantation model. This success prompted the development of a clinical trial protocol for porcine islet xenotransplantation in humans.
Methods:
A single-center, open-label clinical trial initiated by the sponsor will assess the safety and efficacy of porcine islet transplantation for diabetes patients at Gachon Hospital. The protocol received approval from the Gachon Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) under the Investigational New Drug (IND) process. Two diabetic patients, experiencing inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin treatment and frequent hypoglycemic unawareness, will be enrolled. Participants and their family members will engage in deliberation before xenotransplantation during the screening period. Each patient will receive islets isolated from designated pathogen-free pigs. Immunosuppressants and systemic infection prophylaxis will follow the program schedule. The primary endpoint is to confirm the safety of porcine islets in patients, and the secondary endpoint is to assess whether porcine islets can reduce insulin dose and the frequency of hypoglycemic unawareness.
Conclusion
A clinical trial protocol adhering to global consensus guidelines for porcine islet xenotransplantation is presented, facilitating streamlined implementation of comparable human trials worldwide.
3.Clinical Trial Protocol for Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation in South Korea
Byung-Joon KIM ; Jun-Seop SHIN ; Byoung-Hoon MIN ; Jong-Min KIM ; Chung-Gyu PARK ; Hee-Jung KANG ; Eung Soo HWANG ; Won-Woo LEE ; Jung-Sik KIM ; Hyun Je KIM ; Iov KWON ; Jae Sung KIM ; Geun Soo KIM ; Joonho MOON ; Du Yeon SHIN ; Bumrae CHO ; Heung-Mo YANG ; Sung Joo KIM ; Kwang-Won KIM
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1160-1168
Background:
Islet transplantation holds promise for treating selected type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, yet the scarcity of human donor organs impedes widespread adoption. Porcine islets, deemed a viable alternative, recently demonstrated successful longterm survival without zoonotic risks in a clinically relevant pig-to-non-human primate islet transplantation model. This success prompted the development of a clinical trial protocol for porcine islet xenotransplantation in humans.
Methods:
A single-center, open-label clinical trial initiated by the sponsor will assess the safety and efficacy of porcine islet transplantation for diabetes patients at Gachon Hospital. The protocol received approval from the Gachon Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) under the Investigational New Drug (IND) process. Two diabetic patients, experiencing inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin treatment and frequent hypoglycemic unawareness, will be enrolled. Participants and their family members will engage in deliberation before xenotransplantation during the screening period. Each patient will receive islets isolated from designated pathogen-free pigs. Immunosuppressants and systemic infection prophylaxis will follow the program schedule. The primary endpoint is to confirm the safety of porcine islets in patients, and the secondary endpoint is to assess whether porcine islets can reduce insulin dose and the frequency of hypoglycemic unawareness.
Conclusion
A clinical trial protocol adhering to global consensus guidelines for porcine islet xenotransplantation is presented, facilitating streamlined implementation of comparable human trials worldwide.
4.Clinical Trial Protocol for Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation in South Korea
Byung-Joon KIM ; Jun-Seop SHIN ; Byoung-Hoon MIN ; Jong-Min KIM ; Chung-Gyu PARK ; Hee-Jung KANG ; Eung Soo HWANG ; Won-Woo LEE ; Jung-Sik KIM ; Hyun Je KIM ; Iov KWON ; Jae Sung KIM ; Geun Soo KIM ; Joonho MOON ; Du Yeon SHIN ; Bumrae CHO ; Heung-Mo YANG ; Sung Joo KIM ; Kwang-Won KIM
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2024;48(6):1160-1168
Background:
Islet transplantation holds promise for treating selected type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, yet the scarcity of human donor organs impedes widespread adoption. Porcine islets, deemed a viable alternative, recently demonstrated successful longterm survival without zoonotic risks in a clinically relevant pig-to-non-human primate islet transplantation model. This success prompted the development of a clinical trial protocol for porcine islet xenotransplantation in humans.
Methods:
A single-center, open-label clinical trial initiated by the sponsor will assess the safety and efficacy of porcine islet transplantation for diabetes patients at Gachon Hospital. The protocol received approval from the Gachon Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) under the Investigational New Drug (IND) process. Two diabetic patients, experiencing inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin treatment and frequent hypoglycemic unawareness, will be enrolled. Participants and their family members will engage in deliberation before xenotransplantation during the screening period. Each patient will receive islets isolated from designated pathogen-free pigs. Immunosuppressants and systemic infection prophylaxis will follow the program schedule. The primary endpoint is to confirm the safety of porcine islets in patients, and the secondary endpoint is to assess whether porcine islets can reduce insulin dose and the frequency of hypoglycemic unawareness.
Conclusion
A clinical trial protocol adhering to global consensus guidelines for porcine islet xenotransplantation is presented, facilitating streamlined implementation of comparable human trials worldwide.
5.Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Rehabilitation in Older Patients With Hip Fractures
Kyunghoon MIN ; Jaewon BEOM ; Bo Ryun KIM ; Sang Yoon LEE ; Goo Joo LEE ; Jung Hwan LEE ; Seung Yeol LEE ; Sun Jae WON ; Sangwoo AHN ; Heui Je BANG ; Yonghan CHA ; Min Cheol CHANG ; Jung-Yeon CHOI ; Jong Geol DO ; Kyung Hee DO ; Jae-Young HAN ; Il-Young JANG ; Youri JIN ; Dong Hwan KIM ; Du Hwan KIM ; In Jong KIM ; Myung Chul KIM ; Won KIM ; Yun Jung LEE ; In Seok LEE ; In-Sik LEE ; JungSoo LEE ; Chang-Hyung LEE ; Seong Hoon LIM ; Donghwi PARK ; Jung Hyun PARK ; Myungsook PARK ; Yongsoon PARK ; Ju Seok RYU ; Young Jin SONG ; Seoyon YANG ; Hee Seung YANG ; Ji Sung YOO ; Jun-il YOO ; Seung Don YOO ; Kyoung Hyo CHOI ; Jae-Young LIM
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2021;45(3):225-259
Objective:
The incidence of hip fractures is increasing worldwide with the aging population, causing a challenge to healthcare systems due to the associated morbidities and high risk of mortality. After hip fractures in frail geriatric patients, existing comorbidities worsen and new complications are prone to occur. Comprehensive rehabilitation is essential for promoting physical function recovery and minimizing complications, which can be achieved through a multidisciplinary approach. Recommendations are required to assist healthcare providers in making decisions on rehabilitation post-surgery. Clinical practice guidelines regarding rehabilitation (physical and occupational therapies) and management of comorbidities/complications in the postoperative phase of hip fractures have not been developed. This guideline aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for various treatment items required for proper recovery after hip fracture surgeries. Methods Reflecting the complex perspectives associated with rehabilitation post-hip surgeries, 15 key questions (KQs) reflecting the complex perspectives associated with post-hip surgery rehabilitation were categorized into four areas: multidisciplinary, rehabilitation, community-care, and comorbidities/complications. Relevant literature from four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was searched for articles published up to February 2020. The evidence level and recommended grade were determined according to the grade of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation method. Results A multidisciplinary approach, progressive resistance exercises, and balance training are strongly recommended. Early ambulation, weigh-bearing exercises, activities of daily living training, community-level rehabilitation, management of comorbidities/complication prevention, and nutritional support were also suggested. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the total healthcare cost.
Conclusion
This guideline presents comprehensive recommendations for the rehabilitation of adult patients after hip fracture surgery.
6.Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Rehabilitation in Older Patients With Hip Fractures
Kyunghoon MIN ; Jaewon BEOM ; Bo Ryun KIM ; Sang Yoon LEE ; Goo Joo LEE ; Jung Hwan LEE ; Seung Yeol LEE ; Sun Jae WON ; Sangwoo AHN ; Heui Je BANG ; Yonghan CHA ; Min Cheol CHANG ; Jung-Yeon CHOI ; Jong Geol DO ; Kyung Hee DO ; Jae-Young HAN ; Il-Young JANG ; Youri JIN ; Dong Hwan KIM ; Du Hwan KIM ; In Jong KIM ; Myung Chul KIM ; Won KIM ; Yun Jung LEE ; In Seok LEE ; In-Sik LEE ; JungSoo LEE ; Chang-Hyung LEE ; Seong Hoon LIM ; Donghwi PARK ; Jung Hyun PARK ; Myungsook PARK ; Yongsoon PARK ; Ju Seok RYU ; Young Jin SONG ; Seoyon YANG ; Hee Seung YANG ; Ji Sung YOO ; Jun-il YOO ; Seung Don YOO ; Kyoung Hyo CHOI ; Jae-Young LIM
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2021;45(3):225-259
Objective:
The incidence of hip fractures is increasing worldwide with the aging population, causing a challenge to healthcare systems due to the associated morbidities and high risk of mortality. After hip fractures in frail geriatric patients, existing comorbidities worsen and new complications are prone to occur. Comprehensive rehabilitation is essential for promoting physical function recovery and minimizing complications, which can be achieved through a multidisciplinary approach. Recommendations are required to assist healthcare providers in making decisions on rehabilitation post-surgery. Clinical practice guidelines regarding rehabilitation (physical and occupational therapies) and management of comorbidities/complications in the postoperative phase of hip fractures have not been developed. This guideline aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for various treatment items required for proper recovery after hip fracture surgeries. Methods Reflecting the complex perspectives associated with rehabilitation post-hip surgeries, 15 key questions (KQs) reflecting the complex perspectives associated with post-hip surgery rehabilitation were categorized into four areas: multidisciplinary, rehabilitation, community-care, and comorbidities/complications. Relevant literature from four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was searched for articles published up to February 2020. The evidence level and recommended grade were determined according to the grade of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation method. Results A multidisciplinary approach, progressive resistance exercises, and balance training are strongly recommended. Early ambulation, weigh-bearing exercises, activities of daily living training, community-level rehabilitation, management of comorbidities/complication prevention, and nutritional support were also suggested. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the total healthcare cost.
Conclusion
This guideline presents comprehensive recommendations for the rehabilitation of adult patients after hip fracture surgery.
7.Is It Worth Treating Non-Bothering Nocturia? Results of a Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.
Kwangsung PARK ; Hyoung Keun PARK ; Sae Woong KIM ; Dae Yul YANG ; Jong Kwan PARK ; Hyun Jun PARK ; Ki Hak MOON ; Du Geon MOON ; Kweon Sik MIN ; Hwancheol SON ; Sung Won LEE ; Jae Seog HYUN ; Woo Suk CHOI ; Sang Kuk YANG
The World Journal of Men's Health 2018;36(3):248-254
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment in patients with non-bothering nocturia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, patients who visited hospitals for treatment of voiding symptoms were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were: 1) men >45 years, and 2) nocturia ≥2 confirmed by a three-day voiding diary. Subjects were divided into non-bothering and bothering groups based on International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Nocturia (ICIQ-N) question 2b. Changes in voiding symptoms, frequency of nocturia, and bothersomeness were evaluated with international prostate symptom score (IPSS), ICIQ-N, and three-day voiding diary at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients in the non-bothering nocturia group and 50 patients in the bothering nocturia group who completed the 12-week treatment were analyzed. The total IPSS was decreased by 5.8 in the non-bothering group and 5.2 in the bothering group. There was no significant difference in decrease of IPSS between the two groups. Both groups showed significant reduction in discomfort of nocturia. The ICIQ-N 2b score decreased from 3.9 to 2.7 (p=0.01) in the non-bothering group and from 6.9 to 4.6 (p=0.02) in the bothering group. The number of nocturia episodes was significantly decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of discomfort associated with nocturia, both groups showed significant improvement in nocturia-related discomfort and voiding symptoms. These results suggest that patients with nocturia who were unaware of its discomfort benefited from treatment.
Humans
;
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
;
Male
;
Nocturia*
;
Observational Study*
;
Prospective Studies*
;
Prostate
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
8.Differences in Prostate Cancer between Korean Patients, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer/Rotterdam Group, and a Dutch Clinical Cohort.
Ji Sung SHIM ; Jae Heon KIM ; Hoon CHOI ; Jae Hyun BAE ; Hong Seok PARK ; Du Geon MOON ; Jun CHEON ; Jae Young PARK
Korean Journal of Urological Oncology 2016;14(1):18-26
PURPOSE: We evaluated differences in biopsy-detected prostate cancer (PC) between a newly defined Korean clinical cohort (KCC) and two Western populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 723 Korean men aged 55 to 75 years who underwent an initial transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy from 2004 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Prostate biopsies were performed due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels greater than 4.0ng/ml, or suspicious findings on rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography. Characteristics of PC were compared between the KCC and Western groups (the Rotterdam group of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer: ERSPC and Dutch Clinical Cohort: DCC). RESULTS: The cancer detection rate was 26.4% (191/723) in the KCC, 20.9% (473/2268) in the ERSPC/Rotterdam group and 43.1% (138/320) in the DCC. The median PSA in patients with PC was 11.8ng/ml, 5.7ng/ml and 7.5ng/ml in the KCC, ERSPC/Rotterdam group, and DCC, respectively. The proportion of patients with a Gleason score of 7 or more was 57.1% (109/191) in the KCC, 37.5% (174/464) in the ERSPC/Rotterdam group and 37.0% (51/138) in the DCC. CONCLUSIONS: We found large differences in cancer detection rate, PSA, and Gleason score distribution between the KCC and Western cohorts. PC detected in Korean patients had more advanced clinical factors than in Western populations due to low availability of PSA screening programs.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Biopsy
;
Cohort Studies*
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Mass Screening*
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Prostate*
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
Prostatic Neoplasms*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Ultrasonography
9.Hepatic Hemangioma with Kasabach-Merritt Syndrome in an Adult Patient.
Chan Young OAK ; Chung Hwan JUN ; Eun Ae CHO ; Du Hyun LEE ; Sung Bum CHO ; Chang Hwan PARK ; Young Eun JOO ; Hyun Soo KIM ; Jong Sun REW ; Sung Kyu CHOI
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2016;67(4):220-223
Hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of the liver. They are generally asymptomatic, but giant hemangiomas can lead to abdominal discomfort, bleeding, or obstructive symptoms. Kasabach-Merritt syndrome is a rare but life-threatening complication of hemangioma, characterized by consumptive coagulopathy with large vascular tumors. More than 80% of Kasabach-Merritt syndrome cases occur within the first year of life. However, there are few reports of Kasabach-Merritt syndrome with giant hepatic hemangioma in adults and, as far as we know, no reports of Kasabach-Merritt syndrome with hepatic hemangioma treated with first line medical treatment only. The most important treatment for this syndrome is removal of the large vascular tumor. However, surgical treatment entails risk of bleeding, and the patient's condition can mitigate against surgery. We herein present a case of unresectable giant hepatic hemangioma with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. The patient was a 60-year-old woman who complained of hematochezia, ecchymosis, and abdominal distension. She refused all surgical management and was therefore treated with systemic glucocorticoids and beta-blockers. After two weeks of steroid therapy, she responded partially to the treatment. Her laboratory findings and hematochezia improved. She was discharged on hospital day 33 and observed without signs of bleeding for three months.
Abdomen/diagnostic imaging
;
Ecchymosis/etiology
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology
;
Hemangioma/complications/*diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Kasabach-Merritt Syndrome/complications/*diagnosis/drug therapy
;
Middle Aged
;
Prednisone/therapeutic use
;
Propranolol/therapeutic use
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
10.Predictors of Rebleeding in Upper Gastrointestinal Dieulafoy Lesions.
Sang Hun PARK ; Du Hyeon LEE ; Chang Hwan PARK ; Jin JEON ; Ho Jun LEE ; Sung Uk LIM ; Seon Young PARK ; Hyun Soo KIM ; Sung Kyu CHOI ; Jong Sun REW
Clinical Endoscopy 2015;48(5):385-391
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dieulafoy lesions (DLs) are a rare but significant cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to define the clinical significance of rebleeding and identify the predictors of rebleeding and mortality in upper gastrointestinal Dieulafoy lesions (UGIDLs). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with UGIDLs between January 2004 and June 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to define the predictors of rebleeding and mortality in patients with UGIDLs. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 81 male and 36 female patients. Primary hemostasis was achieved in 115 out of 117 patients (98.3%) with various endoscopic therapies. Rebleeding occurred in 10 patients (8.5%). The mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with rebleeding than in those without rebleeding (30.0% vs. 4.7%, p=0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that kidney disease (p=0.006) and infection (p=0.005) were significant predictors of rebleeding in UGIDLs and that kidney disease (p=0.004) and platelet count (p=0.013) were significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rebleeding has an important prognostic significance in patients with UGIDLs. Kidney disease and infection are major predictors of rebleeding and mortality in patients with UGIDLs.
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
;
Hemorrhage
;
Hemostasis
;
Humans
;
Kidney Diseases
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Mortality
;
Platelet Count
;
Retrospective Studies

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail