Asthma, Occupational ; therapy ; Drainage ; methods ; Humans ; Sputum

No abstract available.
Catheterization/*methods ; Drainage/*methods ; Humans ; Male ; *Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; Postoperative Complications/*therapy

OBJECTIVETo investigate the traditional VSD from one-way improvement to two-way suction drainage, meet the needs of clinical treatment, and prevent bung tube.

METHODSOne-way multi-side hole drainage tube of the traditional VSD was modified for bi-directional multi-side hole drainage, seaweed salt hydration alcohol polyethylene foam, Semipermeable membrane paste of Polyurethane and acrylic remains the same with that of the traditional VSD.

RESULTSThe applications of bi-directional multi-side hole drainage pipe can reduce the rate of plugging, rinse the complex and infection wound, create a physiological moist healing environment, and promote wound healing.

CONCLUSIONSThe improved VSD can reduce the failure rate and increase the therapeutic effect.

Percutaneous drainage of 4 pancreatic abscesses and 5 pancreatic pseudocysts was performed under the guidance of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy. Clinical inprovement following the percutaneous drainage enabled surgical procedure in 2 of 4 pationts with pancreatic abscesses and obviated surgery in the other 2. In patients with pancreatic pseudocysts, recurrence have nat been observed for the last 3 years. Percutaneous drainage is a safe and effective procedure and could be the method of choice in the management of pancreatic pseudocyst that is symptomatic and enlarging. Percutaneous drainage could play a significant role in the management of the patients with pancreatic abscess.
Abscess* ; Drainage* ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Methods ; Pancreatic Pseudocyst ; Recurrence ; Ultrasonography

Percutaenous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is widely used to control cholangitis, sepsis, or jaundice caused by biliary tree obstruction. The PTBD tract can be used in percutaneous biliary stone extraction in pre-or post-operative state when ERCP is failed or operation is contraindicated. We performed 16 cases of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stone removal. Locations of biliay stones are combined intrahepatic and extrahepatic in 8 cases (50%), only extrahepati in 7 cases (44%), and only intrahepatic in 1 case (6%). The number of stones was single in 6 cases and multiple in 10 cases. Over all success rate was 81% (13/16), 93% (14/15) in extrahepatic stones and 78% (7/9) in intrahepatic stones. In 5 of 6 cases, complete stone removal was impossible due to marked tortuosity of T-tube tract or peripherally located stones, complete removal of biliary stones was achieved via a new PTBD tract. No significant pre-or post-procedure complication was occured. Percutaneous removal of biliary stones via PTBD tract is an effective and safe alternative method in difficult cases in the menagement of biliary tract stones.
Biliary Tract ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholangitis ; Drainage ; Jaundice ; Methods ; Sepsis

Endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage is the current standard of care for unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and bilateral metal stent placement is shown to have longer patency. However, technical and clinical failure is possible and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is sometimes necessary. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is increasingly being reported as an alternative rescue procedure to PTBD. EUS-BD has a potential advantage of not traversing the biliary stricture and internal drainage can be completed in a single session. Some approaches to bilateral biliary drainage for hilar MBO under EUS-guidance include a bridging method, hepaticoduodenostomy, and a combination of EUS-BD and transpapillary biliary drainage. The aim of this review is to summarize data on EUS-BD for hilar MBO and to clarify its advantages over the conventional approaches such as endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage and PTBD.
Constriction, Pathologic ; Drainage ; Endosonography ; Methods ; Standard of Care ; Stents

BACKGROUND: The accurate information about the volume of pericardial effusion can assist in clinical decisions and has impartant prognostic value. In addition, accurate quantification of serial change in effusion volume is necessary in assessing pericardial disease and making a decision of immediate drainage. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of 2-D echocardiographic quantification of pericardial effusion. METHOD: The study populations are 22 patients with large pericardial effusion whose volume of effusion is confirmed by paracentesis or surgical drainage. Through the echocardiographic reviw, the volume of pericardial sac and heart was calculated by method of D'cruz and then, the effusion volume was derived as the difference of two volumes. Each echocardiographically calculated volume of pericardial effusion was compared with the measured volume drained percutaneously or surgically. RESULTS: The volume of pericardial effusion calculated echocardiographically was excellently correlated with the drained volume(r=0.90, p < 0.01). The echo-free space was well correlated with the volume of pericardial effusion in the anterior aspect of the heart(r=0.71, p < 0.01), but not in the posterior aspect. CONCLUSION: 2-D echocardiographic Quantification of pericardial effusion is simple and reliable method, and its clinical efficacy may be great.
Drainage ; Echocardiography ; Heart ; Humans ; Methods ; Paracentesis ; Pericardial Effusion ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral versus unilateral biliary drainage in malignant hilar obstruction.

METHODSTopically relevant studies,regardless of randomized or observational design, were searched for in PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane Library database. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the effect of the two treatments.

RESULTSThree randomized trials and 7 observational studies were included, involving 894 patients with malignant hilar obstruction. The meta-analysis assessment of primary outcomes showed that the stent patency rate was better in bilateral drainage than in unilateral drainage (Rr=2.03,95% CI [1.16-3.56], P=0.01), but there were no significant differences in successful drainage rate (Rr=1.07,95% CI [0.97-1.18], P=0.20) and patient survival rate (Rr=-0.16,95% CI [-0.40-0.08], P=0.20). In the analysis of secondary outcomes,there were also no significant differences in the technical success rate (Rr=1.05,95% CI [0.98-1.17], P=0.34),the early complication rate (Rr=1.15, 95% CI [0.75-1.76], P=0.52), late complication rate (Rr=1.09,95% CI [0.75-1.60], P=0.60) and 30-day mortality rate (Rr=0.68,95% CI [0.38-1.23], P=0.20).

CONCLUSIONAlthough the cumulative stent patency was better for the bilateral than the unilateral drainage approach, based on the available data, there is not enough data to support bilateral drainage for malignant hilar obstruction. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm it.

Drainage ; methods ; Humans ; Surgical Wound Infection ; surgery ; Vacuum

Drainage ; methods ; Humans ; Surgical Wound Infection ; surgery ; Vacuum