OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. METHODS: Between April 2020 and December 2021, eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones received laparoscopic transcystic drainage (C-tube technique) and common bile duct exploration. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively collected. The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones, thirteen patients received traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, and the remaining five received modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The mean surgical duration were (161±59) min (82-279 min), no bile duct stenosis or residual stone was observed in the patients receiving postoperative cholangiography via C-tube. The maximum volume of C-tube drainage was (500±163) mL/d (180-820 mL/d). Excluding three patients with early dislodgement of C-tube, among the fifteen patients with C-tube maintained, the median time of C-tube removal was 8 d (5-12 d). The duration of hospital stay was (12±3) d (7-21 d) for the 18 patients. Five C-tube related adverse events were observed, all of which occurred in the patients with traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, including two abnormal position of the C-tube, and three early dislocation of the C-tube. All the 5 adverse events caused no complications. Only one grade one complication occurred, which was in a patient with modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The patient demonstrated transient fever after C-tube removal, but there was no bile in the drainage tube and the subsequent CT examination confirmed no bile leakage. The fever spontaneously relieved with conservative observation, and the patient recovered uneventfully with discharge the next day. All the 18 patients were followed up for 1-20 months (median: 9 months). Normal liver function and no recurrence of stone were detected with ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. The short-term effect is good. Modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage approach may reduce the incidence of C-tube dislocation and bile leak.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Gallstones/etiology* ; Drainage/methods* ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects* ; Common Bile Duct/surgery*

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma has an extremely poor prognosis and is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative management plays an important role in the treatment of patients with inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical, percutaneous, and endoscopic biliary drainage are three modalities available to resolve obstructive jaundice. Plastic stents were widely used in the past; however, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have become popular recently due to their long patency and reduced risk of side branch obstruction, and SEMS are now the accepted treatment of choice for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Bilateral drainage provides more normal and physiological biliary flow through the biliary ductal system than that of unilateral drainage. Unilateral drainage was preferred until recently because of its technical simplicity. But, with advancements in technology, bilateral drainage now achieves a high success rate and is the preferred treatment modality in many centers. However, the choice of unilateral or bilateral drainage is still controversial, and more studies are needed. This review focuses on the endoscopic method and discusses stent materials and types of procedures for patients with a hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Bile Duct Neoplasms/*surgery ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/*surgery ; Cholangiocarcinoma/*surgery ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Drainage/adverse effects/instrumentation/*methods ; *Endoscopy/adverse effects/instrumentation ; Humans ; Prosthesis Design ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to examine the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) versus open laparotomy with temporary closure in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with early-stage severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Clinical data of 212 patients who underwent PCD and 61 patients who were given open laparotomy with temporary closure in our hospital over the last 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed, and outcomes were compared, including total and post-decompression intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, physiological data, organ dysfunction, complications, and mortality. The results showed that the organ dysfunction scores were similar between the PCD and open laparotomy groups 72 h after decompression. In the PCD group, 134 of 212 (63.2%) patients required postoperative ICU support versus 60 of 61 (98.4%) in the open laparotomy group (P<0.001). Additionally, 87 (41.0%) PCD patients experienced complications as compared to 49 of 61 (80.3%) in the open laparotomy group (P<0.001). There were 40 (18.9%) and 32 (52.5%) deaths, respectively, in the PCD and open laparotomy groups (P<0.001). In conclusion, minimally invasive PCD is superior to open laparotomy with temporary closure, with fewer complications and deaths occurring in PCD group.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catheterization ; adverse effects ; methods ; Decompression, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Drainage ; adverse effects ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Intra-Abdominal Hypertension ; complications ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Pancreatitis ; complications ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effects of primary duct closure and T-tube drainage in laparoscopy choledochotomy to treat the common bile duct stones.

METHODSThe enrollment of the patients was in accordance with 6 criteria. 55 patients with cholecystolithiasis and secondary common bile duct stones from January 2000 to February 2003 were treated with laparoscopic choledochotomy. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: primary duct closure group and T-tube drainage group. Their all data were recorded and studied prospectively,and patients were followed up after discharge.

RESULTSThere were 27 patients and 28 patients in primary duct closure group and T-tube drainage group respectively. The operation time and the results of following up between the two groups had no significant difference. Compared with T-tube drainage group, primary duct closure group had less the total quantity of postoperative transfusion and hospital costs, shorter postoperative hospital stay. The incidence of postoperative complications in primary duct closure group was 11.1% (3/27), and all of them were biliary complications. The incidence of postoperative complications in T-tube drainage group was 28.6% (8/28), and seven of them were biliary complications. The incidence of severe complications that needed reoperations was 10.7% (93/28), and all of them were caused by T-tubes. There was no mortality in two groups.

CONCLUSIONSThe primary duct closure in laparoscopic choledochotomy can avoid the deficiency of T-tube drainage, and it is feasible and safe and lower complications in treating the common bile duct stones, so we advocate it in appropriate cases.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Choledocholithiasis ; surgery ; Choledochostomy ; methods ; Drainage ; adverse effects ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate therapeutic strategy on septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODSThe clinical data of 6 cases of septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in our department from March 2005 to February 2014 were analyzed. All the patients were male,ranging in age from 18 to 36 years old. After operation, the knee joint became painful and swollen, and ESR and CRP were both increased. Culture of joint fluid allowed the recovery of staphylococcus epidermidis. The patients were dealt with arthroscopic debridement and infusion-drainage. The clinical results were evaluated by Lysholm rating system and range of motion.

RESULTSThe infection of all the patients was controlled. The ESR and CRP both recovered to normal level. The score of Lysholm rating system ranged from 85 to 95,and the range of motion was 120 to 135 degree.

CONCLUSIONArthroscopic debridement combined with infusion-drainage is effective in septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ; adverse effects ; Arthritis, Infectious ; therapy ; Arthroscopy ; methods ; Blood Sedimentation ; C-Reactive Protein ; analysis ; Debridement ; methods ; Drainage ; Humans ; Male

OBJECTIVETo compare the outcomes and complications of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy ( LRP) in the treatment of prostate cancer.

METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 18 cases of prostate cancer treated by 3D LRP and another 32 by 2D LRP. We compared the general data, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage time and hospital stay, Gleason scores, and incidence of complications between the two groups of patients.

RESULTSAll the operations were successful and none was transferred to open surgery. The two groups of patients were similar in terms of age, body mass index, Gleason scores, and clinical stages. However, compared with the 2D LRP group, the 3D LRP group showed significantly shorter operation time ([180.2 ± 69.1] vs [118.3 ± 55.1] min, P < 0.01), less blood loss ([236.5 ± 60.6] vs [89.1 ± 35.2] ml, P < 0.01), less postoperative drainage time ([7.1 ± 1.1] vs [5.3 ± 2.1] d, P < 0.01), shorter postoperative hospital stay ([20.2 ± 5.5] vs [14.4 ± 7.2] d, P < 0.01), and lower incidence of perioperative complications (3.1% vs 0, P < 0.01). The incisal margin was pathologically negative in both groups and urinary incontinence was found in neither at 6 months after surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION3D LRP, with its advantages of shorter operative time, faster recovery, and better outcomes than 2D LRP in the treatment of prostate cancer, deserves general application in lower-level hospitals.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Body Mass Index ; Drainage ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Neoplasm Grading ; Operative Time ; Prostatectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Incontinence ; etiology

UNLABELLEDOBJECTIVE To assess the effects of suction drainage versus nondrainage on the post-operative rehabilitation of patients receiving primary bilateral total knee arthroplasties (TKA).

METHODSA prospective study including 40 patients was conducted. These patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and underwent primary bilateral TKA between October 2007 and September 2009 with the same operation team. A suction drainage was placed by randomization in only one knee for each patient, while the other knee as self-control. Pain visual analogue scale score, extremity swelling, wound healing, range of motion and incidence of early post-operative complications between the drained and nondrained group were compared statistically.

RESULTSEach patient was followed up for 12 months. Placing drainage did not relieve the pain, extremity swelling, ecchymosis, or reduce the incidence of early complications (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONSSuction drainage in TKA does not exhibit substantial advantages in promoting post-operative rehabilitation after unsophisticated TKA, compared with nondrainage. On the other hand, it might complicate the surgical operation, and increase the incidence of post-operative hemorrhage and retrograde infection. Thus we do not recommend suction drainage in unsophisticated TKA.

Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; adverse effects ; rehabilitation ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; prevention & control ; Drainage ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Visual Analog Scale ; Wound Healing

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive, image-guided procedure for the treatment of hepatic tumors. While RFA is associated with relatively low morbidity, sporadic bronchobiliary fistulae due to thermal damage may occur after RFA, although the incidence is rare. We describe a patient with a bronchobiliary fistula complicated by a liver abscess that occurred after RFA. This fistula was obliterated after placement of an external drainage catheter into the liver abscess for eight weeks.
Adult ; Biliary Fistula/*etiology/*surgery ; Bronchial Fistula/*etiology/*surgery ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/*surgery ; Catheter Ablation/*adverse effects ; Drainage/*methods ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Abscess/etiology/surgery ; Liver Neoplasms/*surgery

OBJECTIVETo investigate the value of using protective new intracolonic drainage in decreasing low colorectal anastomotic leakage.

METHODSOne hundred and nineteen cases of rectal cancer accepted low anterior resection were randomly assigned to study group (n=55) and control group (n=64). The study group was added with a new intracolonic drainage composed of biofragmentable anastomosis ring and condom during operation. The control group was added with protective ileostomy during operation. The results of surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSAll the cases were followed up over three months and there were no perioperative death. There were no significant differences in physiopathological factors such as age, sex, body type, site of tumor, size of tumor, differentiation of tumor, site of anastomosis, condition of nutrition, concomitant disease between the two groups. In the study group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 4 cases (7.3%), the drainage devices were ablated 18.3 days after operations and there were no drainage-related complications; light anastomotic stenosis occurred in 3 cases (5.5%) three months after operations. Among the cases with leakage, no severe abdominal infection was found, the time of abdominal drainage was 4.8 days, and the amount of abdominal drainage was 12.8 ml/d in primary three days after leakage. In the control group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 7 cases (10.9%), ostomy-related complications occurred in 29 cases (45.3%), anastomotic stenosis occurred in 18 cases (28.1%) and severe anastomotic stenosis occurred in 4 cases (6.3%) after three months. Among the cases with leakage, severe infection occurred in two cases, anastomotic spoiled occurred in one case, the amount of abdominal drainage was 35.4 ml/d in primary three days after leakage, and the time of abdominal drainage was 17.1 days. There was no significant difference in the rate of anastomotic leakage between the two groups (P>0.05). But there were significant differences in the amount of abdominal drainage, the time of abdominal drainage and abdominal infection in the cases of anastomotic leakage (P<0.01). There was significant difference in anastomotic stenosis after three months between the two groups (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONSThe intracolonic drainage is a simple, safe and effective method in protecting low colorectal anastomotic leakage, and avoiding harmful results caused by anastomotic leakage. Compared with protective ileostomy, intracolonic drainage can avoid stomy-related physical mental suffering and complications, the rate of later anastomotic stenosis is less, and the time of abdominal drainage is shorter in the cases with leakage.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Drainage ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical characteristics and managements of pyothorax due to postoperative cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery.

METHODSFrom January 2006 to January 2013, 3342 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Of them, 19 patients developed pyothorax following cervical anastomotic leakage and their clinicopathological data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSAll the patients underwent a cervical anastomosis via a three-incisional approach (right cervicothoracic mid-abdominal incision, RT group, n=1094) or a two-incisional approach (left cervicothoracic incision, LT group, n=2248). The total number of cervical anastomotic leakage cases was 237, of which 152 cases were in LT group (6.8%), and 85 cases in RT group (7.8%), respectively (P=0.287). The incidence of pyothorax was 2.0% (n=3) in LT group, and 18.8% (n=16) in RT group, respectively (P<0.01). Fourteen cases develop pyothorax within 3 days after operation. The main symptoms were high fever, dyspnea and chest pain. All the pyothorax patients received conservative treatments, including thoracic closed drainage, nasogastric tube placement, jejunal stoma, nutritional support, antibiotics and symptomatic treatment. Sixteen cases were cured, while 3 cases were dead.

CONCLUSIONSThe right thoracotomy approach predisposes the cervical anastomotic leakage-associated pyothorax. Sufficient drainage and sufficient nutritional support are critical to the treatment.

Aged ; Anastomotic Leak ; Drainage ; methods ; Empyema, Pleural ; etiology ; surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies