Tetrazoles were designed and synthesized as potential inhibitors of triple monoamine neurotransmitters (dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin) reuptake based on the functional and docking simulation of compound 6 which were performed in a previous study. The compound structure consisted of a tetrazole-linker (n)-piperidine/piperazine-spacer (m)-phenyl ring, with tetrazole attached to two phenyl rings (R1 and R2). Altering the carbon number in the linker (n) from 3 to 4 and in the spacer (m) from 0 to 1 increased the potency of serotonin reuptake inhibition. Depending on the nature of piperidine/piperazine, the substituents at R1 and R2 exerted various effects in determining their inhibitory effects on monoamine reuptake. Docking study showed that the selectivity of tetrazole for different transporters was determined based on multiple interactions with various residues on transporters, including hydrophobic residues on transmembrane domains 1, 3, 6, and 8. Co-expression of dopamine transporter, which lowers dopamine concentration in the biophase by uptaking dopamine into the cells, inhibited the dopamine-induced endoctytosis of dopamine D2 receptor. When tested for compound 40 and 56, compound 40 which has more potent inhibitory activity on dopamine reuptake more strongly disinhibited the inhibitory activity of dopamine transporter on the endocytosis of dopamine D2 receptor. Overall, we identified candidate inhibitors of triple monoamine neurotransmitter reuptake and provided a theoretical background for identifying such neurotransmitter modifiers for developing novel therapeutic agents of various neuropsychiatric disorders.

Numerous psychotropic and addictive substances possess structural features similar to those of β-phenethylamine (β-PEA). In this study, we selected 29 β-PEA derivatives and determined their structure–activity relationship (SAR) to their ability to inhibit dopamine (DA) reuptake; conducted docking simulation for two selected compounds; and identified their potential functionals. The compounds were subdivided into arylethylamines, 2-(alkyl amino)-1-arylalkan-1-one derivatives and alkyl 2-phenyl-2-(piperidin-2-yl)acetate derivatives. An aromatic group, alkyl group, and alkylamine derivative were attached to the arylethylamine and 2-(alkyl amino)-1-arylalkan-1-one derivatives. The inhibitory effect of the compounds on dopamine reuptake increased in the order of the compounds substituted with phenyl, thiophenyl, and substituted phenyl groups in the aromatic position; compounds with longer alkyl groups and smaller ring-sized compounds at the alkylamine position showed stronger inhibitory activities. Docking simulation conducted for two compounds, 9 and 28, showed that the (S)-form of compound 9 was more stable than the (R)-form, with a good fit into the binding site covered by helices 1, 3, and 6 of human dopamine transporter (hDAT). In contrast, the (R, S)-configuration of compound 28 was more stable than that of other isomers and was firmly placed in the binding pocket of DAT bound to DA. DAinduced endocytosis of dopamine D2 receptors was inhibited when they were co-expressed with DAT, which lowered extracellular DA levels, and uninhibited when they were pretreated with compound 9 or 28. In summary, this study revealed critical structural features responsible for the inhibition of DA reuptake and the functional role of DA reuptake inhibitors in regulating D2 receptor function.

The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) subunit GluN2B is abundantly expressed in brain regions critical for synaptic plasticity and cognitive processes. This study investigated the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of NMDA-R ligands using GluN2B as a molecular target. Thirty potential NMDA-R antagonists were categorized into two structural classes: 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl) amines (series A) and α-amino-2-phenylcyclohexanone derivatives (series B). In series A compounds, the phenyl ring and R1 substituents were positioned at the carbon center of the cyclohexyl ring, with R2 substituents at the para- or meta-positions of the phenyl ring. SAR analysis revealed optimal binding affinity when R1 was carbonyl (C=O) and R2 was 4-methoxy (4-OMe). Series B compounds featured a cyclohexanone scaffold with NH-R1 at the α-position and a phenyl ring bearing R2 substituents at ortho-, meta-, or para-positions. Maximum binding affinity was achieved with R1 as hydrogen (H) and R2 as hydroxyl (OH). Compounds were assessed for GluN2B-mediated ERK activation to evaluate potential metabotropic signaling properties. Approximately 50% of the compounds demonstrated ERK activation through a non-ionotropic signaling cascade involving Src, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and protein kinase C. This study elucidated key structural determinants for NMDA-R binding and characterized a novel metabotropic signaling pathway. Notably, our findings suggest that compounds acting as antagonists at the ionotropic site may simultaneously function as agonists through non-ionotropic mechanisms.

The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) subunit GluN2B is abundantly expressed in brain regions critical for synaptic plasticity and cognitive processes. This study investigated the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of NMDA-R ligands using GluN2B as a molecular target. Thirty potential NMDA-R antagonists were categorized into two structural classes: 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl) amines (series A) and α-amino-2-phenylcyclohexanone derivatives (series B). In series A compounds, the phenyl ring and R1 substituents were positioned at the carbon center of the cyclohexyl ring, with R2 substituents at the para- or meta-positions of the phenyl ring. SAR analysis revealed optimal binding affinity when R1 was carbonyl (C=O) and R2 was 4-methoxy (4-OMe). Series B compounds featured a cyclohexanone scaffold with NH-R1 at the α-position and a phenyl ring bearing R2 substituents at ortho-, meta-, or para-positions. Maximum binding affinity was achieved with R1 as hydrogen (H) and R2 as hydroxyl (OH). Compounds were assessed for GluN2B-mediated ERK activation to evaluate potential metabotropic signaling properties. Approximately 50% of the compounds demonstrated ERK activation through a non-ionotropic signaling cascade involving Src, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and protein kinase C. This study elucidated key structural determinants for NMDA-R binding and characterized a novel metabotropic signaling pathway. Notably, our findings suggest that compounds acting as antagonists at the ionotropic site may simultaneously function as agonists through non-ionotropic mechanisms.

The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) subunit GluN2B is abundantly expressed in brain regions critical for synaptic plasticity and cognitive processes. This study investigated the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of NMDA-R ligands using GluN2B as a molecular target. Thirty potential NMDA-R antagonists were categorized into two structural classes: 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl) amines (series A) and α-amino-2-phenylcyclohexanone derivatives (series B). In series A compounds, the phenyl ring and R1 substituents were positioned at the carbon center of the cyclohexyl ring, with R2 substituents at the para- or meta-positions of the phenyl ring. SAR analysis revealed optimal binding affinity when R1 was carbonyl (C=O) and R2 was 4-methoxy (4-OMe). Series B compounds featured a cyclohexanone scaffold with NH-R1 at the α-position and a phenyl ring bearing R2 substituents at ortho-, meta-, or para-positions. Maximum binding affinity was achieved with R1 as hydrogen (H) and R2 as hydroxyl (OH). Compounds were assessed for GluN2B-mediated ERK activation to evaluate potential metabotropic signaling properties. Approximately 50% of the compounds demonstrated ERK activation through a non-ionotropic signaling cascade involving Src, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and protein kinase C. This study elucidated key structural determinants for NMDA-R binding and characterized a novel metabotropic signaling pathway. Notably, our findings suggest that compounds acting as antagonists at the ionotropic site may simultaneously function as agonists through non-ionotropic mechanisms.