1.Primary development and biomechanics of single vertebrae internal fixation system for thoracolumbar compression fracture
Jicai LI ; Pingjun LIU ; Yongli HE ; Weidong ZHAO ; Dongzhu LIANG ; Bingyan MAO
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2014;(9):1350-1355
BACKGROUND:For severe thoracolumbar compression fracture (>1/3 compression), ideal therapeutic method is minimal y invasive internal fixation, which has good biomechanical functions. Moreover, bone graft is reliable. Injured vertebra reduction and bone graft stability achieved. Motor unit of spinal column and normal physiological function were retained, resulting in lessening nearby segmental degeneration.
OBJECTIVE:To discuss the design of single vertebrae internal fixation system and evaluate its biomechanical performance which apply to treat thoracolumbar compression fracture by endoscope.
METHODS:A brand-new single vertebrae internal fixation system was designed in accordance with data of anatomic measurement of adult thoracolumbar vertebra. Six fresh adult corpse specimens were prepared to produce models of L 1 compression fracture, and assigned to control group, fracture injury group, single vertebrae internal fixation system group, AF reduction internal fixation group and anterior plate internal fixation group.Three-dimensional movement range experiments were conducted separately.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The biomechanical comparison showed that there was no significant difference in three-dimensional range of motion among single vertebrae internal fixation system group (anteflexion, left and right lateroflexion), AF reduction internal fixation group and anterior plate internal fixation group (P>0.05). However, range of motion significantly increased at backward extension, left and right rotation (P<0.05). Results suggested that the design of single vertebrae internal fixation system was novel and the system had good biomechanical performance at anteflexion, left and right lateroflexion. However, it needs to be improved in which lacks of stability of extension and rotation.
2.Biomechanical performance and effect of static interlocking intramedullary nails on femoral fracture healing
Xuegang YAN ; Tongzhu BAO ; Weidong ZHAO ; Fei YAN ; Dongzhu LIANG ; Zhibing DING
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2010;14(17):3123-3126
BACKGROUND: Interlocking intramedullary nails(SliN)is frequently used to treat femoral fracture.Routine pulling and compression and postoperative motorization are important for fracture healing.To improve fracture healing rate has been focused using various factors.OBJECTIVE: To explore the biomechanical performance of static SliN in fixation of femoral fracture,and the effect on fracture healing.METHODS: A total of 8 pairs of femurs from adult cadavers immersed in formalin were used to prepare models of midpiece transverse fracture.The fracture was respectively fixed using static SliN,TiNi shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing internal fixator(TiNi SMA),and dynamic compression plate(DCP).The anti-compression,anti-bending,and anti-torsion rigidity were measured,and the stress shielding rate was calculated.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: SliN was similar to DCP group in anti-compression rigidity and anti-bending rigidity(P > 0.05),but the anti-torsion was lower than DCP group(P<0.05).Compared with TiNi SMA group,SliN displayed greater anti-compression rigidity and anti-bending rigidity(P<0.05),but similar anti-torsion(P > 0.05).SliN was similar to DCP group in stress shielding rate(P>0.05),but significantly greater than TiNi SMA group(P<0.01).The biomechanics of SliN was stable,but the stress shielding rate was high.Changing static interlocking into dynamic interlocking in time is necessary in clinic to promote fracture healing.
3.Conduction characteristics of human lumbar facet joint pressures during simulated spinal manipulationversusspinal mobilization
Jun ZHANG ; Fei WANG ; Qiang LIU ; Hui ZHANG ; Peidong SUN ; Dongzhu LIANG ; Ping ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2016;20(17):24506-24514
BACKGROUND:The aim of spinal mobilization and spinal manipulation is to correct vertebral subluxation. However, facet joint pressures are not clear during these two therapies.
OBJECTIVE:To compare human lumbar facet joint pressures during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulationversuslow-velocity, low-amplitude spinal mobilization.
METHODS:Totaly 12 adult fresh lumbar spinal specimens (T12-S2) were divided into two groups randomly. Parameters of simulated spinal mobilization (n=6): preload angle 15° (speed 3°/s), maximum angle 20° (speed 1°/s), with 9 N horizontal force to L5 spinous process. Parameters of simulated spinal manipulation (n=6): preload angle 15° (speed 3°/s), impulse angle 20° (impulse speed 33°/s), with 22 N horizontal force to L5 spinous process. Pressures of bilateral L4-5/L5-S1 facet joints were measured with Tekscan system.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) During two spinal manipulative therapies (rotation to the right and then back to the neutral position), pressures of right facet joints decreased first and then increased gradualy, while pressures of left facet joints changed oppositely. (2) Pressures of right facet joints were similar regardless of manipulation type (P > 0.05). The maximum pressure of left facet joints was larger during manipulation than that during mobilization (P < 0.05). (3) Descending speed of pressures of right joint was larger during manipulation than that during mobilization (P < 0.01), and no significant difference in ascending speed of pressure of right facet joints was detected (P > 0.05). Both ascending and descending speeds of the left facet joints were larger during manipulation than that during mobilization (P < 0.01). (4) During two spinal manipulative therapies, pressures of ipsilateral facet joints decreased first and then increased, while pressures of contralateral facet joints increased first and then decreased. Joint pressure after treatment restored to that before treatment. (5) Impulse speed and magnitude of pressures of facet joints during manipulation were larger than that during mobilization. Facet joints are more possible to be injured during manipulation than that during mobilization. During manipulation, we should pay attention to the speed and intensity of the impact.
4.Experimental study on rigidity effect of 3 kinds of different internal fixation at upper thoracic spine
Lijing YANG ; Zengming XIAO ; Dongzhu LIANG ; Juliang HE ; Yun LIU
Chongqing Medicine 2018;47(15):2051-2054
Objective To compare the rigidity at upper thoracic spine among the anterior transpedicular screw-plate system (ATPSPS),posterior transpedicle screw-rod system (PTPSRS) and anterior vertebral body screw-plate system (AVBSPS).Methods Twelve embalmed cadaver specimens were divided into three groups.The specimens in each group were randomly allocated to use the above 3 different internal fixation devices for conducting fixation.The stiffness of each specimen on the directions of axial compression,flexion and extension,and left and right lateral bending was detected under original status.All specimens conducted the simulated corpectomy of T2 (damage status).Then the rigidity on various directions was re-detected on the damage status.The corresponding internal fixation system was selected for conducting the install and fixation according to the grouping results.The intra-group and inter-group rigiditieson different directions were compared amongoriginal status,damage status and after internal fixation.Results The rigidities on different directions under original and damage statushad no statistical difference among various groups (P<0.05).After conducting fixation in each group,the rigidity after fixation on different directions had statistically significant difference among groups(P<0.05).The stiffness of anterior flexion in the ATPSPS group was greater than that in the other two groups (P<0.05).The rigidity of axial compression and extension in the PTPSRS group was greater than that in the other two groups,the difference among groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).The stiffness of lateral bending in the AVBSPS group was smaller than that in the other two groups,the difference was significant (P<0.05),but the difference between the other two groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05).Conclusion The rigidity of ATPSPS in all directions is higher than that of AVBSPS.The anterior flexion rigidity is greater than PTPSRS,and the axial compression and extension rigidity are less than PTPSRS,but the lateral bending rigidity is equivalent to PTPSRS.
5.Status of diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in 2017: a national multi-center retrospective study.
Jie WU ; Xinjian XU ; Hao XU ; Gang MA ; Chi MA ; Xiaocheng ZHU ; Zeqiang REN ; Xudong WU ; Xudong WU ; Yingjie CHEN ; Yanhong WENG ; Liping HU ; Fei CHEN ; Yonggan JIANG ; Hongbin LIU ; Ming WANG ; Zhenhua YANG ; Xiong YU ; Liang LI ; Xinzeng ZHANG ; Zhigang YAO ; Wei LI ; Jianjun MIAO ; Liguang YANG ; Hui CAO ; Fan CHEN ; Jianjun WU ; Shichen WANG ; Dongzhu ZENG ; Jun ZHANG ; Yongqing HE ; Jianliang CAO ; Wenxing ZHOU ; Zhilong JIANG ; Dongming ZHANG ; Jianwei ZHU ; Wenming YUE ; Yongxi ZHANG ; Junling HOU ; Fei ZHONG ; Junwei WANG ; Chang CAI ; Hongyan LI ; Weishun LIAO ; Haiyang ZHANG ; Getu ZHAORI ; Qinjie LIU ; Zhiwei WANG ; Canwen CHEN ; Jianan REN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2019;22(1):49-58
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the current status of diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis (AA) in China.
METHODS:
Questionnaire survey was used to retrospectively collect data of hospitalized patients with AA from 43 medical centers nationwide in 2017 (Sort by number of cases provided: Jinling Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Lu'an People's Hospital, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Dalian Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Dongying People's Hospital, Jinjiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huangshan Shoukang Hospital, Xuyi People's Hospital, Nanjing Jiangbei People's Hospital, Lanzhou 940th Hospital of PLA, Heze Municipal Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science of China Three Gorges University, Affiliated Jiujiang Hospital of Nanchang University, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Affiliated Central Hospital of Shandong Zaozhuang Mining Group, The Third People's Hospital of Kunshan City, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, The 81st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Linyi Central Hospital, The General Hospital of Huainan Eastern Hospital Group, The 908th Hospital of PLA, Liyang People's Hospital, The 901th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, The Fourth Hospital of Jilin University, Harbin Acheng District People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Nanjing Luhe People's Hospital, Taixing Municipal People's Hospital, Baotou Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Linyi People's Hospital, The 72st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, People's Hospital of Dayu County, Taixing City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Beijing Guang'anmen Hospital, Langxi County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanyang Central Hospital, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University).The diagnosis and management of AA were analyzed through unified summary. Different centers collected and summarized their data in 2017 and sent back the questionnaires for summary.
RESULTS:
A total of 8 766 AA patients were enrolled from 43 medical centers, including 4 711 males (53.7%) with median age of 39 years and 958 (10.9%) patients over 65 years old. Of 8 776 patients, 5 677 cases (64.6%) received one or more imaging examinations, and the other 3 099 (35.4%) did not receive any imaging examination. A total of 1 858 (21.2%) cases received medical treatment, mainly a combination of nitroimidazoles (1 107 cases, 59.8%) doublet regimen, followed by a single-agent regimen of non-nitroimidazoles (451 cases, 24.4%), a nitroimidazole-free doublet regimen (134 cases, 7.2%), a triple regimen of combined nitroimidazoles (116 cases, 6.3%), nitroimidazole alone (39 cases, 2.1%) and nitroimidazole-free triple regimen (3 cases, 0.2%). Of the 6 908 patients (78.8%) who underwent surgery, 4 319 (62.5%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 2589 (37.5%) underwent open surgery. Ratio of laparotomy was higher in those patients under 16 years old (392 cases) or over 65 years old (258 cases) [15.1%(392/2 589) and 10.0%(258/2 589), respectively, compared with 8.5%(367/4 316) and 8.0%(347/4 316) in the same age group for laparoscopic surgery, χ²=91.415, P<0.001; χ²=15.915,P<0.001]. Patients with complicated appendicitis had higher ratio of undergoing open surgery as compared to those undergoing laparoscopic surgery [26.7%(692/2 589) vs. 15.6%(672/4 316), χ²=125.726, P<0.001].The cure rates of laparoscopic and open surgery were 100.0% and 99.8%(2 585/2 589) respectively without significant difference (P=0.206). Postoperative complication rates were 4.5%(121/2 589) and 4.7%(196/4 316) respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ²=0.065, P=0.799). The incidence of surgical site infection was lower (0.6% vs. 1.7%, χ²=17.315, P<0.001), and hospital stay was shorter [6(4-7) days vs. 6(5-8) days, U=4 384 348.0, P<0.001] in the laparoscopic surgery group, while hospitalization cost was higher (median 12 527 yuan vs. 9 342 yuan, U=2 586 809.0, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still clinically based, supplemented by imaging examination. Appendectomy is still the most effective treatment at present. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the main treatment strategy, but anti-infective drugs are also very effective.
Acute Disease
;
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
therapeutic use
;
Appendectomy
;
Appendicitis
;
diagnosis
;
therapy
;
China
;
Female
;
Health Care Surveys
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult