1.Clinical and TUBB4A mutation analysis of hypomyelination with atrophy of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in a family
Xiaolong DENG ; Huifang YAN ; Jiangxi XIAO ; Ye WU ; Qiang GU ; Haoran JI ; Dongxiao LI ; Yuwu JIANG ; Jingmin WANG
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics 2016;31(24):1867-1870
Objective To analyze the clinical data and TUBB4A mutation of hypomyelination with atrophy of the basal ganglia and cerebellum (HABC)in a family,thus to provide accurate genetic counseling and prenatal diagno-sis for this family with HABC,and also to provide clinical experience for the diagnosis of HABC in China.Methods The clinical data of the proband and her family members were collected at the Department of Pediatrics,Peking Univer-sity First Hospital,December 201 4,including medical history,physical signs,and brain MRI,biochemical tests and metabolic disease screening.The associated gene of hereditary leukoencephalopathy was screened for the proband and her family members were screened by targeting -high -throughput sequencing technology,and then the genetic varia-tions were verified by Sanger sequencing.With those detection methods,the gene mutation was confirmed,and then ge-netic features were analyzed.Results Clinical features were as follows:nystagmus as the first symptom,and motor and mental retardation,dystonia and ataxia followed.Brain MRI indicated hypomyelination of white matter and atrophy of the basal ganglia and cerebellum.The clinical diagnosis of HABC was established based on the clinical features and brain MRI features above.Genetics features showed that one novel TUBB4A c.974G >T heterozygous missense muta-tion was found from the proband,which caused an amino acid change from the Trp into Leu (p.Trp325Leu).Both of her parents with normal phenotype were of wild -type in this site.Conclusions The proband from this family was diagnosed clinically based on her clinical data.One novel TUBB4Ac.974G > T (p.Trp325Leu)was founded in this study.Therefore,the spectrum of TUBB4A mutation will be expanded.In addition,this study elucidated clinical and genetic characteristics in this family with HABC,which may lay a solid foundation for the accurate genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis.This study reported the first case of HABC caused by TUBB4A mutation in China.
2.Efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab alone and combined laser therapy for the treatment of DME: a meta-analysis
Dongxiao JI ; Yinghui JIN ; Xiangying REN ; Xuhui LI ; Qiao HUANG ; Xin HU ; Bo ZHAO ; Haiying JIN
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology 2023;41(10):1004-1010
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with laser (IVR+ Laser) and the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).Methods:A meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trial (RCT) literature related to IVR+ Laser therapy and IVR alone for DME.Databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from their inception to April 2022.Literature screening, data extraction, quality evaluation and cross-checking were conducted independently by two researchers according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.Then a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software.The two therapies were compared in terms of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), mean number of injections and adverse events.Results:Twelve RCTs involving 1 695 eyes were included in the study.Meta-analysis showed that at the end of follow-up, IVR+ Laser demonstrated better improvement in BCVA and CMT than IVR alone, and there were significant differences in the changes in BCVA and CMT between the two groups (weighted mean difference[WMD]=-0.66, 95% confidence interval[ CI]: -1.11--0.21, P<0.01; WMD=-5.05, 95% CI: -9.21--0.89, P=0.02).IVR+ Laser required significantly fewer injections than IVR alone (WMD=-1.16, 95% CI: -2.07--0.25, P=0.01).There were no significant differences in the adverse events incidence between the two therapies (all at P>0.05). Conclusions:The safety of IVR+ Laser is comparable to IVR alone, and it requires fewer injections for the treatment of DME.