Objective To evaluate effects and safety of mixed solution of sodium hyaluronate, normal saline and indicarmine during endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD). Methods A total of 233 patients with gastric, esophageal and colonic lesions diagnosed by endoscopy in the digestive endoscopy center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between September 2015 and November 2016 were randomly divided into the experimental group(173 patients)and the control group(50 patients). The experimental group was injected with sodium hyaluronate 100 mg+normal saline 60 mL+0.2% indicarmine 4 mL, and the control group with normal saline 70 mL+0.2% indicarmine 4 mL. The solutions were used for multi-point injection in submucosa outside markers of lesions, respectively, and ESD was performed until lesions were effectively lifted up. The location and size of lesions, operation time, dose of injection and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The diameter of resected specimen was 1.9± 1.3 cm in the experimental group, slightly less than that in the control group(2.0 ± 1.8 cm,P>0.05). The operation time from lesion mark to the end of ESD in the experimental group was 59.5±26.7 min,significantly less than that in the control group(68.6±29.0 min, P<0.05). The dose of injection in the experimental group(55.5 ± 31.8 mL)was obviously lower than that in the control group (66.7±35.1 mL,P<0.05). The rate of delayed bleeding in the experimental group was 1.16%(2/173),which was significantly lower than that in the control group[12.00%(6/50), P<0.05]. No delayed perforation occurred in the experimental group,while 3 cases(6.00%)occurred in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion ESD shows better effects and high safety after the submucosal injection of mixed solution of sodium hyaluronate,normal saline and indicarmine.

Objective:To study the curative effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with internal fixation with hollow screws on femoral neck fractures.Methods:The clinical data of 160 patients with femoral neck fracture were retrospectively analyzed who had been treated by internal fixation with hollow screws at Orthopedic Department Ⅲ, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Luohe Medical College from May 2012 to May 2018. According to whether PRP was used or not to assist their internal fixation, they were divided into a PRP group ( n=80) and a control group ( n=80). In the PRP group, there were 46 males and 34 females with an age of 52.3 years±7.6 years, and one case of type Ⅰ, 5 cases of type Ⅱ, 57 cases of type Ⅲ and 17 cases of type Ⅳ by the Garden classification. In the control group, there were 41 males and 39 females with an age of 50.6 years ± 7.3 years, and 2 cases of type Ⅰ, 7 cases of type Ⅱ, 51 cases of type Ⅲ and 20 cases of type Ⅳ by the Garden classification. The 2 groups were compared in terms of fracture healing time, nonunion, femoral head necrosis and Harris hip scores. Results:The 2 groups were comparable because their preoperative general data showed no significant differences ( P>0.05). The 160 patients obtained follow-up for 12 to 36 months. The PRP group showed significantly shorter fracture healing time (4.3 months ± 1.0 months), significantly lower incidences of nonunion [0% (0/80)] and avascular necrosis of femoral head [3.8% (3/80)] than the control group [7.3 months ± 1.3 months, 7.5% (6/80) and 15.0% (12/80), respectively] (all P< 0.05). The Harris scores at 6 and 12 months after operation for the PRP group (88.7±5.3 and 94.2±4.8) were significantly higher than those for the control group (81.4±4.6 and 84.2±5.2) (both P<0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of femoral neck fractures, compared with internal fixation with hollow screws alone, platelet rich plasma combined with internal fixation with hollow screws can significantly shorten fracture healing time, reduce incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head and improve functional recovery of the hip joint.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness of proximal femur bionic nail (PFBN) in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly compared to the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made on 48 geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2020 and December 2022. Among them, 24 cases were treated with PFBN fixation after fracture reduction (PFBN group), and 24 cases were treated with PFNA fixation (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, gender, cause of injury, side and type of fracture, time from injury to operation, and preoperative mobility score, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Alzheimer's disease degree scoring, self-care ability score, osteoporosis degree (T value), and combined medical diseases between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of blood transfusions, transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, occurrence of complications, weight-bearing time after operation, and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, walking ability score, mobility score, self-care ability score were recorded and compared between the two groups. And the radiographic assessment of fracture reduction quality and postoperative stability, and fracture healing time were recorded. RESULTS: The operations in both groups were successfully completed. All patients were followed up 6-15 months with an average time of 9.8 months in PFBN group and 9.6 months in PFNA group. The operation time was significantly longer in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, number of blood transfusions, transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, change in activity ability score, and change in self-care ability score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The weight-bearing time after operation was significantly shorter in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( P<0.05), and the postoperative VAS score and walking ability score were significantly better in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( P<0.05). Radiographic assessment showed no significant difference in fracture reduction scores and postoperative stability scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). All fractures healed and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly lower in PFBN group (16.7%, 4/24) than in PFNA group (45.8%, 11/24) ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with PFNA, PFBN in the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures can effectively relieve postoperative pain, shorten bed time, reduce the risk of complications, and facilitate the recovery of patients' hip joint function and walking ability.
Humans ; Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; Bionics ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Treatment Outcome ; Bone Nails ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Femur