1.Insufficiency fracture after radiation therapy.
Radiation Oncology Journal 2014;32(4):213-220
Insufficiency fracture occurs when normal or physiological stress applied to weakened bone with demineralization and decreased elastic resistance. Recently, many studies reported the development of IF after radiation therapy (RT) in gynecological cancer, prostate cancer, anal cancer and rectal cancer. The RT-induced insufficiency fracture is a common complication during the follow-up using modern imaging studies. The clinical suspicion and knowledge the characteristic imaging patterns of insufficiency fracture is essential to differentiate it from metastatic bone lesions, because it sometimes cause severe pain, and it may be confused with bone metastasis.
Anus Neoplasms
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Fractures, Stress*
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
Rectal Neoplasms
;
Stress, Physiological
2.The reasonable timing of the adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine carcinosarcoma according to the surgical intent: suggestion based on progression patterns.
Jeong Il YU ; Doo Ho CHOI ; Seung Jae HUH ; Won PARK ; Dongryul OH ; Duk Soo BAE
Radiation Oncology Journal 2013;31(2):72-80
PURPOSE: We designed this study to identify and suggest the reasonable timing of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine carcinosarcoma according to the surgical intent and patterns of progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 50 carcinosarcoma patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2010. Among these 50 patients, 32 underwent curative surgery and 13 underwent maximal tumor debulking surgery. The remaining five patients underwent biopsy only. Twenty-six patients received chemotherapy, and 15 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 17.3 months. Curative resection (p < 0.001) and stage (p < 0.001) were statistically significant factors affecting survival. During follow-up, 30 patients showed progression. Among these, eight patients (16.0%) had loco-regional progression only. The patients who had received adjuvant radiotherapy did not show loco-regional progression, and radiotherapy was a significant negative risk factor for loco-regional progression (p = 0.01). The time to loco-regional progression was much earlier for non-curative than curative resection (range, 0.7 to 7.6 months vs. 7.5 to 39.0 months). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of carcinosarcoma might be related to a low loco-regional progression rate. Radiotherapy should be considered in non-curatively resected patients as soon as possible.
Biopsy
;
Carcinosarcoma
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
3.The Current Evidence on Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2020;53(4):160-167
Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer.Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended to improve survival, based on the results of severalrandomized trials and meta-analyses. However, controversy remains regarding howto combine surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Moreover, in East Asia, the predominanthistological type is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, which has a differentepidemiology and tumor biology from esophageal or gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma.As such, the management of esophageal cancer in East Asia seems to bedifferent from that in Western countries. Thus, this article reviews the current evidence onneoadjuvant therapy and considers the optimal combinations and ongoing strategies ofmultimodal therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
5.Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Current Clinical Applications and Future Direction
Korean Journal of Head and Neck Oncology 2021;37(1):1-10
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using X-rays is a standard technique implemented for treating head and neck cancer (HN C). Compared to 3D conformal RT, IMRT can significantly reduce the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues by using a highly conformal dose to the tumor. Proton therapy is a type of RT that uses positively charged particles named protons. Proton therapy has a unique energy deposit (i.e., Bragg peak) and greater biological effectiveness than that of therapy using X-rays. These inherent properties of proton therapy make the technique advantageous for HNC treatment. Recently, advanced techniques such as intensity-modulated proton therapy have further decreased the dose to normal organs with a higher conformal dose to the tumor. The usage of proton therapy for HNC is becoming widespread as the number of operational proton therapy centers has increased worldwide. This paper aims to present the current clinical evidence of proton therapy utility to HNC clinicians through a literature review. It also discusses the challenges associated with proton therapy and prospective development of the technique.
6.Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Current Clinical Applications and Future Direction
Korean Journal of Head and Neck Oncology 2021;37(1):1-10
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using X-rays is a standard technique implemented for treating head and neck cancer (HN C). Compared to 3D conformal RT, IMRT can significantly reduce the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues by using a highly conformal dose to the tumor. Proton therapy is a type of RT that uses positively charged particles named protons. Proton therapy has a unique energy deposit (i.e., Bragg peak) and greater biological effectiveness than that of therapy using X-rays. These inherent properties of proton therapy make the technique advantageous for HNC treatment. Recently, advanced techniques such as intensity-modulated proton therapy have further decreased the dose to normal organs with a higher conformal dose to the tumor. The usage of proton therapy for HNC is becoming widespread as the number of operational proton therapy centers has increased worldwide. This paper aims to present the current clinical evidence of proton therapy utility to HNC clinicians through a literature review. It also discusses the challenges associated with proton therapy and prospective development of the technique.
7.Development of the DVH management software for the biologically-guided evaluation of radiotherapy plan.
Bokyong KIM ; Hee Chul PARK ; Dongryul OH ; Eun Hyuk SHIN ; Yong Chan AHN ; Jinsung KIM ; Youngyih HAN
Radiation Oncology Journal 2012;30(1):43-48
PURPOSE: To develop the dose volume histogram (DVH) management software which guides the evaluation of radiotherapy (RT) plan of a new case according to the biological consequences of the DVHs from the previously treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the radiation pneumonitis (RP) as an biological response parameter in order to develop DVH management software. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of lung cancer patients treated with curative 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). The biological event was defined as RP of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade III or more. RESULTS: The DVH management software consisted of three parts (pre-existing DVH database, graphical tool, and Pinnacle3 script). The pre-existing DVH data were retrieved from 128 patients. RP events were tagged to the specific DVH data through retrospective review of patients' medical records. The graphical tool was developed to present the complication histogram derived from the pre-existing database (DVH and RP) and was implemented into the radiation treatment planning (RTP) system, Pinnacle3 v8.0 (Phillips Healthcare). The software was designed for the pre-existing database to be updated easily by tagging the specific DVH data with the new incidence of RP events at the time of patients' follow-up. CONCLUSION: We developed the DVH management software as an effective tool to incorporate the phenomenological consequences derived from the pre-existing database in the evaluation of a new RT plan. It can be used not only for lung cancer patients but also for the other disease site with different toxicity parameters.
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
Medical Records
;
Radiation Pneumonitis
;
Retrospective Studies
8.Erratum: Acknowledgments correction.
BoKyong KIM ; Hee Chul PARK ; Dongryul OH ; Eun Hyuk SHIN ; Yong Chan AHN ; Jinsung KIM ; Youngyih HAN
Radiation Oncology Journal 2012;30(2):97-97
The funding acknowledgment in this article was partially omitted as published.
9.Sorafenib-triggered radiation recall dermatitis with a disseminated exanthematous reaction.
Dongryul OH ; Hee Chul PARK ; Ho Yeong LIM ; Byung Chul YOO
Radiation Oncology Journal 2013;31(3):171-174
Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, which is the current standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Only one case of radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) associated with sorafenib has been reported so far. Our patient with recurrent HCC was treated with palliative radiotherapy (RT) for the chest wall mass. Sorafenib at 400 mg twice daily was begun on the day following RT. On the 14th day post-RT, an erythematous patch was observed on right chest wall which matched area previously irradiated. It was consistent with RRD. Ten days later, a disseminated exanthematous rash and severe pruritus occurred. Sorafenib was stopped and an oral antihistamine was prescribed to relieve symptoms. At the 1-week follow-up after the cessation of sorafenib, all symptoms were resolved. Physicians should be alert to this recall phenomenon as it can occur both in the skin and elsewhere and the occurrence of RRD may be unpredictable.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
;
Exanthema
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Niacinamide
;
Phenylurea Compounds
;
Phosphotransferases
;
Pruritus
;
Radiodermatitis
;
Skin
;
Thoracic Wall
10.Radiation Therapy Alone in cT1-3N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Are Unfit for Surgical Resection or Stereotactic Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Risk-Adaptive Dose Schedules.
Won Kyung CHO ; Jae Myoung NOH ; Yong Chan AHN ; Dongryul OH ; Hongryull PYO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(4):1187-1195
PURPOSE: High dose definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone is recommended to patients with cT1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer, who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic RT. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness following RT alone using two different modest hypofractionation dose schemes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2014, 124 patients underwent RT alone. From 2001 till 2010, 60 Gy in 20 fractions was delivered to 79 patients (group 1). Since 2011, 60 Gy in 20 fractions (group 2, 20 patients), and 60 Gy in 15 fractions (group 3, 25 patients) were selectively chosen depending on estimated risk of esophagitis. RESULTS: At follow-up of 16.7 months, 2-year rates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 62.6%, 39.1%, and 59.1%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better in group 3 (p=0.002). In multivariate analyses, cT3 was the most powerful adverse factor affecting clinical outcomes. Incidence and severity of radiation pneumonitis were not different among groups, while no patients developed grade 2 esophagitis in group 3 (p=0.003). Under current Korean Health Insurance Policy, RT cost per person was 22.5% less in group 3 compared with others. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that 60 Gy in 15 fractions instead of 60 Gy in 20 fractions resulted in comparable clinical outcomes with excellent safety, direct cost saving, and improved convenience to the patients with tumors located at ≥ 1.5 cm from the esophagus.
Appointments and Schedules*
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung*
;
Cost Savings
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Dose Fractionation
;
Esophagitis
;
Esophagus
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Insurance, Health
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Radiation Pneumonitis
;
Radiotherapy