PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the difference in the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics by age groups of the children with hand injuries requiring surgery who visited the emergency department (ED) of a community hospital that runs a hand center. METHODS: We reviewed 388 consecutive children with hand injuries requiring surgery, aged < 16 years, who visited the ED from January 2011 through September 2016. Information was obtained regarding age and gender of the children, seasonal and daily distribution of the visits, location, cause, site, and level of the injury, the diagnosis, and presence of serious injury. The children were classified into 3 age groups; toddlers (0 to 3 years), preschoolers (4 to 6 years), and schoolers (7 to 15 years). Severe injury was defined as amputation or crush injury. RESULTS: Mean age of the children was 7.4 ± 5.0 years and boys accounted for 65.7%. The most frequent visits occurred during the weekend (53.1%) and in spring (30.7%), and most children visited the ED with injuries that occurred at home and indoors (55.2% and 79.9%, respectively). The most common cause, site, and level of the injury were sharp object (34.8%), fingers other than the thumb and index finger (64.7%), and the distal phalanx (46.7%), respectively. In the toddler group, domestic, indoor, door-related, and distal phalanx injuries were more common than in the schooler group (P < 0.001). Physical contact or sharp object-related injuries increased with increasing age (P < 0.001). Severe injuries were more common among the toddlers than the schoolers (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the toddler group, domestic, indoor, door-related, distal phalanx, and severe injuries were more common than in the schooler group. These characteristics by age groups would aid in preventing hand injury in children, especially toddlers.
Amputation ; Child* ; Diagnosis ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Fingers ; Hand Injuries* ; Hand* ; Hospitals, Community ; Humans ; Pediatrics ; Seasons ; Thumb

Objective: Patients presenting with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone can avail of two treatment options at the emergency department (ED). This study compared outcomes between dressing and composite graft (CG) using skin stump for patients visiting the ED with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. We reviewed 244 patients with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone who visited the ED from September 2018 to February 2021. We compared the outcomes of the patients who were treated by CG using skin stump and those who received a dressing in the ED. Results: In all, 142 patients were treated by CG using skin stump, and 102 patients were given a dressing only. In the CG group, good outcomes were obtained in 140 patients, whereas additional skin graft treatment was required for two patients with bad outcomes. In the dressing group, 81 patients had good outcomes and 21 patients had bad outcomes which required additional skin graft treatment. Conclusion Results of our study revealed that compared to traditional dressing, ED treatment for fingertip skin defects without exposed bone showed good outcomes when administered CG using skin stump. Hence, we recommend that instead of simple dressing, CG using skin stump is the preferred mode of treatment for patients presenting in the ED with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone.