Objective: To investigate the effect of silencing the high-mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1) combined with docetaxel (DTX) on the proliferation and apoptosis of PCa cells and its possible action mechanism. METHODS: The expression of HMGB1 mRNA in different PCa cell lines and normal prostatic epithelial cells was detected by RT-qPCR. The PC-3 cells were transfected with different HMGB1 small interfering RNAs (si-HMGB1, si-HMGB1-2 and si-HMGB1-3), and the silencing effect was detected. The effects of different concentrations of DTX on the proliferation of the PC-3 cells was determined by MTT. Then the PC-3 cells were randomly divided into five groups: control (conventional culture), si-HMGB1-NC (si-HMGB1-NC transfection), si-HMGB1 (si-HMGB1-3 transfection), DTX (20 nmol/L DTX), and si-HMGB1+DTX (si-HMGB1-3+20 nmol/L DTX transfection), followed by measurement of the survival rate of the cells by MTT, their apoptosis rate by flow cytometry, and the expressions of HMGB1, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2-associated X (Bax) proteins in different groups by Western blot. RESULTS: The expression of HMGB1 mRNA in the PC-3 cells was the highest and the lowest after transfection with si-HMGB1-3. DTX inhibited the proliferation of the PC-3 cells at various concentrations. Compared with the control group, the si-HMGB1 and DTX groups showed significantly decreased A values, cell survival rates and HMGB1 and Bcl-2 expressions, but increased cell apoptosis rates and Bax expressions (P < 0.05). In comparison with the si-HMGB1 and DTX groups, the si-HMGB1+DTX group exhibited a remarkably decreased A value, cell survival rate and Bcl-2 expression, but increased cell apoptosis and Bax expression. The expression of the HMGB1 protein was markedly lower in the si-HMGB1+DTX than in the DTX group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Silencing HMGB1 combined with DTX chemotherapy can inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of PCa cells, which may be attributed to its regulatory effect on the expressions of the Bcl-2 family-related proteins.、.
Apoptosis ; Cell Proliferation ; Docetaxel/pharmacology* ; HMGB1 Protein/genetics* ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics*

Androstenes ; Docetaxel ; Humans ; Male ; Prednisone ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a commonly used anti-tumor drug in clinic, especially as the first-line drug for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the molecular mechanism of docetaxel against NSCLC is still unclear. Increasing studies have shown that metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells plays an important role in tumorigenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of docetaxel on the metabolic pathway of NSCLC cells based on metabolomics analysis and biological means. METHODS: First, we performed CCK8 assay to analyze the effects of docetaxel on cell viability of NSCLC cells and also to screen the appropriate drug concentration. Then, the differential metabolites of docetaxel-treated and untreated NSCLC cells were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabolomics. Finally, the effects of docetaxel on the expression levels of key enzymes that regulate the relevant metabolic pathways were determined by Western blot. RESULTS: Docetaxel inhibited cell viability of A549 and H1299 cells in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. With the prolonged treatment time of docetaxel, the apoptotic sensitive protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) was gradually activated to form a P89 fragment. Metabolomics analysis showed that eight metabolites were significantly changed in both A549 and H1299 cells following docetaxel treatment, which were mainly in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle pathway. Moreover, after docetaxel treatment, the protein expression levels of isocitrate dehydrogenases, the key regulators of the TCA cycle, were obviously decreased in both A549 and H1299 cells. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the effect of docetaxel-induced proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in NSCLC might be associated with down-regulation of isocitrate dehydrogenases and suppression of the TCA cycle pathway.
A549 Cells ; Apoptosis ; drug effects ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; pathology ; Docetaxel ; pharmacology ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; pathology ; Metabolomics

Docetaxel-loaded nanomicelles were prepared in this study to improve the solubility and tumor targeting effect of docetaxel(DTX),and further evaluate their anticancer effects in vitro. PBAE-DTX nanomicelles were prepared by film-hydration method with amphiphilic block copolymer polyethyleneglycol methoxy-polylactide(PELA) and pH sensitive triblock copolymer polyethyleneglycol methoxy-polylactide-poly-β-aminoester(PBAE) were used respectively to prepare PELA-DTX nanomicelles and PBAE-DTX nanomicelles. The nanomicelles were characterized by physicochemical properties and the activity of mice Lewis lung cancer cells was studied. The results of particle size measurement showed that the blank micelles and drug-loaded micelles had similar particle sizes, ranging from 10 to 100 nm. The particle size of PBAE micelles was changed under weak acidic conditions, with good pH response. The encapsulation efficiency of the above two types of DTX-loaded nanomicelles determined by HPLC was(93.8±1.70)% and(87.2±4.10)%, and the drug loading amount was(5.3±0.10)% and(4.9±0.05)%,respectively. Furthermore,the DTX micelles also showed significant inhibitory effects on Lewis lung cancer cells by MTT assay, and pH-sensitive PBAE-DTX showed better cytotoxicity. The results of flow cytometry indicated that,the apoptosis rate of lung cancer Lewis cells was(20.72±1.47)%,(29.71±2.38)%,and(40.91±1.90)%(P<0.05) at 48 h after treatment in DTX,PELA-DTX,and PBAE-DTX groups. The results showed that different docetaxel preparations could promote the apoptosis of Lewis cells, and PBAE-DTX had stronger apoptotic-promoting effect. The pH-sensitive DTX-loaded micelles are promising candidates in developing stimuli triggered drug delivery systems in acidic tumor micro-environments with improved inhibitory effects of tumor growth on Lewis lung cancer.
Animals ; Antineoplastic Agents ; pharmacology ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Docetaxel ; pharmacology ; Drug Carriers ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Mice ; Micelles ; Nanoparticles ; Particle Size ; Taxoids

Objective: To explore the outcome of different treatment strategies in patients with pancreatic cancer with synchronous liver metastasis (sLMPC). Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data and treatment results of 37 patients with sLMPC treated in China-Japan Friendship Hospital was performed from April 2017 to December 2022. A total of 23 males and 14 females were included,with an age(M(IQR)) of 61 (10) years (range: 45 to 74 years). Systemic chemotherapy was carried out after pathological diagnosis. The initial chemotherapy strategy included modified-Folfirinox, albumin paclitaxel combined with Gemcitabine, and Docetaxel+Cisplatin+Fluorouracil or Gemcitabine with S1. The possibility of surgical resection (reaching the standards of surgical intervention) was determined after systemic treatment,and the chemotherapy strategy was changed in the cases of failed initial chemotherapy plans. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival time and rate,while Log-rank and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the differences of survival curves. Results: The median follow-up time for the 37 sLMPC patients was 39 months,and the median overall survival time was 13 months (range:2 to 64 months) with overall survival rates of 1-,3-,and 5-year of 59.5%,14.7%,and 14.7%,respectively. Of the 37 patients,97.3%(36/37) initially received systemic chemotherapy, 29 completed more than four cycles,resulting in a disease control rate of 69.4% (partial response in 15 cases,stable disease in 10 cases,and progressive disease in 4 cases). In the 24 patients initially planned for conversion surgery,the successful conversion rate was 54.2% (13/24). Among the 13 successfully converted patients,9 underwent surgery and their treatment outcomes were significantly better than those (4 patients) of those who did not undergo surgery (median survival time not reached vs. 13 months,P<0.05). Regarding the 9 patients whose conversion was unsuccessful, no significant differences were observed in median survival time between the surgical group (4 cases) and the non-surgical group (5 cases) (P>0.05). In the allowed-surgery group(n=13),the decreased in pre-surgical CA19-9 levels and the regression of liver metastases were more significant in the successful conversion sub-group than in the ineffective conversion sub-group;however, no significant differences were observed in the changes in primary lesion between the two groups. Conclusion: For highly selective patients with sLMPC who achieve partial response after receiving effective systemic treatment,the adoption of an aggressive surgical treatment strategy can significantly improve survival time;however, surgery dose not provide such survival benefits in patients who do not achieve partial response after systemic chemotherapy.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Docetaxel/therapeutic use* ; Liver Neoplasms/secondary* ; Fluorouracil ; Leucovorin/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) combined with platinum containing dual drug chemotherapy is a new adjuvant treatment option for operable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the quality assurance of clinical trials of related drugs plays a crucial role in the results of the clinical trials. This study aims to explore the impact of adverse events (AEs) supervision on reducing treatment-related AEs in patients. METHODS: 66 NSCLC patients admitted to Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2020 to October 2021 were prospectively collected. All the patients received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment of Camrelizumab in combination with Docetaxel and Cisplatin. 4 weeks-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy, the patients accepted surgical treatment. One cycle of postoperative adjuvant treatment was given within 30 days after surgery, and 3 weeks after the completion of postoperative adjuvant treatment, Camrelizumab consolidation treatment was intiated, with a total of 13 cycles. The quality of life-C30 (QoL-C30) was used to measure patients' quality of life and the occurrence of AEs was monitored. RESULTS: The overall safety is good, with a total of 300 AEs occurring in 66 patients, including 282 cases of grade 1-2 AEs and 18 cases of grades 3-4 AEs. The most common grades 3-4 AEs associated with PD-1 antibodies occurred in 6 cases (9.1%). Neoadjuvant therapy supervision can lead to a decrease in patients' QOL-C30 scores (P<0.05) and an improvement in their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Camrelizumab combined with Docetaxel and Cisplatin can be used as a new adjuvant treatment for operable stage III NSCLC. Through the observation and control of AEs, treatment measures can be taken in time to reduce further complications, ensure patient' safety, and ensure the authenticity, scientificity and reliability of clinical trial data.
Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; China ; Cisplatin ; Docetaxel ; Lung Neoplasms ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Prospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To observe the early efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel combined with carboplatin in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: From May 2017 to July 2019, fifteen patients with mCRPC treated in Peking University First Hospital were collected. The median age was 70 years (43-77 years), and the pathological types were all adenocarcinoma, which was confirmed as distant metastasis by imaging examination. They were given the chemotherapy of docetaxel combined with carboplatin. The specific method was as follows: each cycle was 28 days. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered routinely throughout the treatment period. Blood routine, liver and kidney function, blood clotting function and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests were performed before each cycle. Docetaxel was administered intravenously on the first day of each cycle at a dose of 75 mg/m², and carboplatin was administered intravenously on the second day at the dose calculated by Calvert formula. The main outcome measures including PSA decline range, pain remission rate and occurrence of adverse reactions were observed and analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 15 patients, 12 had completed at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy and had short-term efficacy evaluation. PSA decline range > 50% was observed in 8 patients (66.7%). Among the 9 patients with bone pain, remarkable pain relief was observed in 4 patients (44.4%). Among the 4 patients with measurable metastatic lesions, 2 achieved partial response, 1 was evaluated as stable disease, and 1 was evaluated as progressive disease. The main adverse reactions of chemotherapy included bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal reactions, fatigue and neurological disorders, and most of them were within the tolerable range. CONCLUSION This report is a case series study of docetaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of mCRPC reported in China and the conclusions are representative. The chemotherapy of docetaxel combined with carboplatin has positive short-term efficacy and high safety in patients with mCRPC, which is worthy of further promotion and exploration in clinical practice.
Aged ; Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Carboplatin/therapeutic use* ; Docetaxel/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy* ; Treatment Outcome

Chemotherapy in prostate cancer (PCa) has undergone dramatic landscape changes. While earlier studies utilized varying chemotherapy regimens which were found to be largely palliative in nature and hardly resulted in durable or meaningful responses, docetaxel resulted in the first chemotherapy agent that showed improvement in overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, combination chemotherapy or any agents added to docetaxel have failed to yield incremental benefits. The improvement in overall survival as well as secondary endpoints of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and time to recurrence when using docetaxel in the metastatic hormone-sensitive state has changed the standard of care for treatment of newly diagnosed de novo metastatic PCa. There are also promising results in locally advanced PCa and high-risk PCa in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. This review summarizes the historical as well as the more contemporary use of chemotherapeutic agents in PCa in varying states and phases of disease.
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Docetaxel/therapeutic use* ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Male ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Taxoids/therapeutic use*

One of the factors promoting tumoral progress is the abnormal activation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program which has been associated with chemoresistance in tumoral cells. The transcription factor zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), a key EMT activator, has recently been related to docetaxel resistance, the main chemotherapeutic used in advanced prostate cancer treatment. The mechanisms involved in this protective effect are still unclear. In a previous work, we demonstrated that ZEB1 expression induced an EMT-like phenotype in prostate cancer cell lines. In this work, we used prostate cancer cell lines 22Rv1 and DU145 to study the effect of ZEB1 modulation on docetaxel resistance and its possible mechanisms. The results showed that ZEB1 overexpression conferred to 22Rv1 cell resistance to docetaxel while its silencing made DU145 cells more sensitive to it. Analysis of resistance markers showed no presence of ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (MDR1) and no changes in breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) or ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 10 (MRP7). However, a correlation between ZEB1, multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1), and ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 4 (MRP4) expression was observed. MRP4 inhibition, using MK571, resensitized cells with ZEB1 overexpression to docetaxel treatment. In addition, modulation of ZEB1 and subsequent change in MRP4 expression correlated with a lower apoptotic response to docetaxel, characterized by lower B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2), high BCL2-associated X protein (Bax), and high active caspase 3 expression. The response to docetaxel in our model seems to be mediated mainly by activation of the apoptotic death program. Our results showed that modulation of MRP4 could be a mediator of ZEB1-related resistance to docetaxel in prostate cancer, making it a possible marker for chemotherapy response in patients who do not express MDR1.
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Blotting, Western ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Docetaxel/therapeutic use* ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/drug effects* ; Gene Silencing ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism* ; Zinc Finger E-box-Binding Homeobox 1/metabolism*

To investigate the clinical efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) in elderly patients of esophageal cancer.
 Methods: Seventy-nine elderly patients of esophageal cancer were randomly divided into the treatment group (38 patients) and the control group (41 patients). Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was applied in both groups and prescribed dose was set to 56 to 59.4 Gy in 28 to 33 fractions. The concurrent chemotherapy regime for both groups was as follow: docetaxel 25 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 25 mg/m2, per week. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidated chemotherapy was applied to the treatment group with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 
for 3 weeks in one cycle. There was no subsequent treatment for the control group.
 Results: The clinical efficacy was assessed in 76 patients. For the treatment group, 31 patients (response rate, 89.2%) obtained effective response, including 10 cases with complete response (CR) and 21 cases with partial response (PR), both of which were significantly more than that in the control group (response rate, 61.5%), with 9 cases of CR and 15 cases of PR. The median progression-free survival was 19.7 months in the treatment group, clearly longer than that in the control group (10.8 months, P=0.04). The overall survival for 1-year, 2-year and 3-year were 78.5%, 57.9% and 37.8% in the treatment group versus 61.2%, 42.3% and 22.7% in the control group (P>0.05), respectively. Grade 1 and 2 adverse effects were commonly observed in both groups, such as hematologic toxicity and radiation-induced esophagitis, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 
 Conclusion: For elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma, the overall response rate can be significantly improved by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with subsequently consolidated chemotherapy based on docetaxel and cisplatin..
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; Chemoradiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; Consolidation Chemotherapy ; adverse effects ; Disease-Free Survival ; Docetaxel ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; mortality ; Esophagitis ; epidemiology ; Female ; Hematologic Diseases ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; Remission Induction ; Taxoids ; adverse effects