1.Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock
Matt RYAN ; Natalia BRICENO ; Divaka PERERA
Korean Circulation Journal 2019;49(3):197-213
Despite the development of acute revascularisation, the mortality rate for cardiogenic shock remains around 50%. Mechanical circulatory support devices have long held promise in improving outcomes in shock, but high-quality evidence of benefit has not been forthcoming. In this article we review the currently available devices for treating shock, their physiological effects and the evidence base for their use in practice. We subsequently look ahead within this developing field, including new devices and novel indications for established technology.
Cardiac Catheterization
;
Cardiac Catheters
;
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
;
Mortality
;
Myocardial Infarction
;
Shock
;
Shock, Cardiogenic
2.Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock
Matt RYAN ; Natalia BRICENO ; Divaka PERERA
Korean Circulation Journal 2019;49(3):197-213
Despite the development of acute revascularisation, the mortality rate for cardiogenic shock remains around 50%. Mechanical circulatory support devices have long held promise in improving outcomes in shock, but high-quality evidence of benefit has not been forthcoming. In this article we review the currently available devices for treating shock, their physiological effects and the evidence base for their use in practice. We subsequently look ahead within this developing field, including new devices and novel indications for established technology.