Chlorhexidine ; Citric Acid ; Dental Pulp Cavity ; Disinfectants ; Disinfection ; Doxycycline ; Edetic Acid ; Humans ; Hydrogen Peroxide ; Needles ; Polysorbates ; Root Canal Irrigants ; Root Canal Preparation ; instrumentation ; methods ; Sodium Hypochlorite ; Ultrasonics

To evaluate amoebicidal efficacy of various disinfectants, we treated ten ocular isolates of Acanthamoeba with polyhexamethylene biguanide(PHMB), chlorhexidine and hexamidine. Acanthamoeba cysts were collected from axenic nonnutrient agar plates from 4 week culture. Cyst suspension(100microliter) was inoculated on 96-well microplate with concentration of 105 cys/ml. Each well was treated with two-fold diluted hexamidine, PHMB and chlorhexidine(100microliter each, 8 and 48hrs). Each well was examined under the inverted microscope until 7 days after treatment. Minimal cysticidal concentration(MCC) of each disinfectant qas measured after five experiments. MCC of hexamidine, chlorhexidine and PHMB against ten ocular isolates ranged 6.07-500microgram/ml, 3.12-12.50microgram/ml, 1.17-4.68microgram/ml respectively in 48hr treatment. In 8hr treatment, MCC of PHMB and chlorhexidine ranged 4.42-12.50microgram/ml and 4.67-17.71microgram/ml, but hexamidine did not demonstrate cysticidal effect. For proper disinfection of contact lens, disinfectants having cysticidal efficacy should be included in the composition of contact lens solution. Among the currently used topical amoebicidal agents, PHMB showed the greatest cysticidal activity on ten ocular strains of Acanthamoeba in invitro study.
Acanthamoeba* ; Agar ; Chlorhexidine* ; Contact Lens Solutions ; Disinfectants ; Disinfection

No abstract available.
Disinfectants

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cysticidal effect of 5 kinds of commercially available contact lens disinfectants against 2 clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba. METHODS: Five kinds of commercially available contact lens disinfectants were soaked with cysts of Acanthamoeba ludgdunesis and castellanii at the concentration of 10(3), 10(4), and 10(5) cells/ml for 1 and 4 or 6 hours. Cysts which were not excysted in 7 days after treatment were recognized to be killed. Morphologic changes were evaluated by electron microscopic observation. RESULTS: Contact lens disinfectants which contain myristamidopropyl dimethylamine (MAPD) showed the best cysticidal effect. These disinfectants demonstrated a cysticidal effect on both Acanthamoeba species of all concentrations in 6-hour treatment. Contact lens disinfectants which contain polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) did not demonstrate cysticidal effect, except for Acanthamoeba castellanii at the concentration of 10(3) cells/ml, in either 4- or 6-hour treatment. Separation of plasma membrane from endocyst and damage of organelles were prominent in cases showing a cysticidal effect. CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens disinfectant which contains MAPD may be helpful in preventing the Acanthamoeba keratitis. A higher concentration of PHMB is required to be effective in preventing Acanthamoeba keratitis.
Acanthamoeba castellanii ; Acanthamoeba Keratitis ; Acanthamoeba* ; Cell Membrane ; Contact Lens Solutions ; Disinfectants ; Organelles

OBJECTIVEThe disinfection efficiency of a compound disinfectant spray with trichioro hydroxyl diphenyl ether on dental impression and plaster model, which have been contaminated by pathogens, were evaluated in this study.

METHODSAs experimental group, germ-free alginate impressions and plaster models were sprayed with the compound disinfectant of different density trichloro hydroxyl diphenyl ether or indophors for 5, 10 and is mm, after which were smeared with five tested pathogens, including Staphylococcus acre us, Escherichia cali, Saccharomyces albicans, Streptococcus mutans and black spore variants of Bacillus subtilis. The colonies were counted after sampling, inoculate and culture, which were used to deduce the killing logarithm value as the standard of the disinfecting efficiency.

RESULTSthe compound disinfectant spray with 3000 mg x L(-1) triebloro hydroxyl diphenyl ether was effective to all tested pathogens for 10 mm whatever on the impressions or the plaster models. The disinfectant spray with tame concentration was more effective on the alginate impression than on the plaster model in the same time (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONThe compound disinfectant spray with trichioro hydroxyl diphenyl ether is an effective antiseptics for alginate impressions and plaster models.

Acute Disease ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Chronic Disease ; Disinfectants ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Periapical Abscess ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Periapical Granuloma ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Periapical Periodontitis ; classification ; diagnosis ; pathology ; therapy ; Problem Solving ; Prognosis ; Root Canal Irrigants ; therapeutic use ; Root Canal Therapy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients disinfectant on dental impression accuracy. METHODS: The effect of Cavicide on three impression materials (alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane) were assessed using a standard model. The standard model was digitized by an extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric). For each kind of impression materials, thirty impressions were taken following the manufactures' instruction in the same conditions. Subsequently, the impressions were randomly divided into three groups, with ten impressions in each group. After the impression taking was completed, the three groups underwent pure water rinse for 1 min (blank control, BC), 2% glutaraldehyde solution immersion disinfection for 30 min (glutaraldehyde, GD), and Cavicide solution spray disinfection for 5 min (Cavicide, CC), respectively. All the impressions were digitized by the extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric) after disinfection and exported to a dedicated three-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Qualify 2014, Geomagic, USA). In the software, the digital models of the impressions were trimmed to teeth and then superimposed with the digitized standard model via best-fit alignment. Root mean square (RMS) was used to evaluate the deviations between the impression and the standard model. The deviation in the anterior and posterior regions was evaluated respectively. One-way ANOVA test and the LSD post-hoc test were used to compare the deviations between the three groups (P < 0.05). The color map of each superimposition was saved for visual analysis. RESULTS: For the polyether and vinylpolysiloxane materials, the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.933, P=0.827). For the alginate material, the difference in posterior region between group GD and group BC, as well as group GD and group CC were statistically significant (GD vs. BC, P=0.001; GD vs. CC, P=0.002), while the difference between group BC and group CC was not statistically significant (P=0.854). The visual analysis showed an obvious deviation in the buccal-lingual direction in group GD. CONCLUSION Disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients using spray disinfection has no effect on the accuracy of the alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane impressions.
2-Propanol ; Chloramines ; Dental Impression Materials ; Dental Impression Technique ; Disinfectants ; Disinfection ; Models, Dental

OBJECTIVETo investigate the situation about the dental impression disinfection knowledge of the medical staff in stomatological hospitals.

METHODSA questionnaire investigation was conducted on 582 medical staff in five Grade A Class Three stomatological hospitals. The investigation items included demographic characteristics and knowledge on dental impression disinfection.

RESULTSOf 582 subjects, 424 subjects (72.85%) thought that the dental impressions should be disinfected. 76 persons chose 75% alcohol to disinfect the dental impressions, 26 persons chose povidone iodine or glutaral, 103 persons chose sterilization machine, 180 persons chose to wash with water, and 197 persons were unknown about the sterilization methods. The status of the staff grasping knowledge on dental impression disinfection was related with the working department.

CONCLUSIONOur results suggest that it is necessary to strengthen the importance of impression disinfection to medical staff in stomatological hospitals. The consciousness of protection should be enhanced to reduce the cross infection in hospitals.

The water discharged from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) is heavily contaminated with bacteria. The development of efficient disinfectants is required to maintain good quality DUWL water. The purpose of this study was to establish a DUWL biofilm model using well-plates to confirm the effectiveness of disinfectants in the laboratory. Bacteria were obtained from the water discharged from DUWLs and incubated in R2A liquid medium for 10 days. The bacterial solution cultured for 10 days was made into stock and these stocks were incubated in R2A broth and batch mode for 5 days. Batch-cultured bacterial culture solution and polyurethane tubing sections were incubated in 12-well plates for 4 days. Biofilm accumulation was confirmed through plating on R2A solid medium. In addition, the thickness of the biofilm and the shape and distribution of the constituent bacteria were confirmed using confocal laser microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The average accumulation of the cultured biofilm over 4 days amounted to 1.15×10⁷ CFU/cm². The biofilm was widely distributed on the inner surface of the polyurethane tubing and consisted of cocci, short-length rods and medium-length rods. The biofilm thickness ranged from 2 µm to 7 µm. The DUWL biofilm model produced in this study can be used to develop disinfectants and study DUWL biofilm-forming bacteria.
Bacteria ; Biofilms* ; Disinfectants ; Infection Control, Dental ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Polyurethanes ; Water ; Water Microbiology

The purpose of this study was to evalute the effect of immersion disinfection on the dimensional stability of rubber impression materials. The metallic master model was made in order to simulate the intraoral arch form. Impressions were made from four impression materials (Exaflex, Extrude, Reprosil, Impregum-F) and immersed in three disinfectant solutions (Wydex, Vi-Pon, Potadine). Casts from the impressions were measured according to the interpreparation distance. The A-B and The B-D abutment distance were compared with the control group and disinfected groups. The results were as follows; 1. The measurements of the stone cast increased relative to the master model and there was a significant difference (P<0.05). 2. The relative dimensional change of the stone cast as compared with master model ranged from 0.10% to 0.56% in the A-B distance and ranged from 0.04% to 0.27% in the B-D distance. 3. The dimensional change of the disinfected groups as compared with the control group was significantly different in the three impression materials except for Impregum-F (P<0.05). 4. The relative dimensional change of the disinfected groups compared with the control group ranged from 0% to 0.20% in the A-B distance and ranged from -0.09% to 0.11% in the B-D distance. These results suggest that immersion disinfection of rubber impression materials by chemical disinfectants causes very small dimensional change and the change is clinically acceptable for prothesis fabrication
Disinfectants ; Disinfection* ; Immersion* ; Rubber*