We report a case of Aspergillus terreus discitis which developed in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia following induction chemotherapy. A. terreus was isolated from sputum, one month earlier, but the physician did not consider it significant at the time. Magnetic resonance imaging study showed the involvement of L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 intervertebral discs. Etiology was established by means of histology and culturing a surgical specimen of disc materials. Our patient survived after a surgical debridement and amphotericin B administration with a total dose of 2.0 g. Discitis caused by Aspergillus terreus is a very rare event. A. terreus is one of the invasive Aspergillus species. The pathogenetic mechanism is discussed and the literature is reviewed.
Aspergillosis/surgery ; Aspergillosis/pathology ; Aspergillosis/microbiology* ; Aspergillosis/drug therapy ; Aspergillosis/complications ; Aspergillus/isolation & purification ; Aspergillus/classification ; Journal Article ; Discitis/surgery ; Discitis/pathology ; Discitis/microbiology* ; Discitis/drug therapy ; Human ; Intervertebral Disk/surgery ; Intervertebral Disk/pathology ; Intervertebral Disk/microbiology* ; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Acute/microbiology ; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Acute/drug therapy ; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Acute/complications* ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae/microbiology*

Recurrent disc herniation and postoperative fibrosis are the main disease entities causing failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become a major diagnostic modality in differentiating the two. To observe the variable entities of FBSS and their MR findings, we retrospectively analyzed 15 MR images in 12 patients. The causes of FBSS were as follows; normal (no organic cause), fibrosis, new or recurrent disc herniation, discitis, osteomyelitis, inflammation at operation site, epidural abscess, arachnoiditis, and hematoma. Except a case of hematoma, gadolinium enhancement scan was necessary and informative in the diagnosis of FBSS and MR imaging only was not enough in the diagnosis of arachnoiditis.
Arachnoid ; Arachnoiditis ; Diagnosis ; Discitis ; Epidural Abscess ; Failed Back Surgery Syndrome* ; Fibrosis ; Gadolinium ; Hematoma ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Osteomyelitis ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo compare therapeutic effects between surgical and conservative treatment for postoperative lumbar discitis.

METHODSFrom January 2004 to January 2009, 41 patients (17 males and 24 females ranging the age from 37 to 68 years with an average of 53.6 years) with postoperative lumbar discitis were retrospectively studied and divided into two groups. There were 19 patients in operation group, 22 patients in conservative group. Clinical data and features,image data, laboratory examinations, antibiotics utilization, hospital stays and sequelae were recorded and analyzed. Visual analogue scales system (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied to evaluate therapeutic effects.

RESULTSAll patients were followed up over 2 years. Imaging revealed good bone fusion and no occurrence of discitis. VAS score and ODI at 1 month, 1 year and 2 years were significantly improved after treatment (P < 0.01). While VAS and ODI in operation group at 1 month were improved more than that of conservative group (P < 0.01), and there was no significant difference between two groups at 1 year and 2 years (P > 0.01).

CONCLUSIONSurgical and conservative treatment for postoperative lumbar discitis is effective. Surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment in a short time, while conservative treatment can achieve long-term satisfactory curative effects.

Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Discitis ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; drug effects ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Infective spondylodiscitis usually occurs in patients of older age, immunocompromisation, co-morbidity, and individuals suffering from an overall poor general condition unable to undergo reconstructive anterior and posterior surgeries. Therefore, an alternative, less aggressive surgical method is needed for these select cases of infective spondylodiscitis. This retrospective clinical case series reports our novel surgical technique for the treatment of infective spondylodiscitis. METHODS: Between January 2005 and July 2011, among 48 patients who were diagnosed with pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis or tuberculosis lumbar spondylodiscitis, 10 patients (7 males and 3 females; 68 years and 48 to 78 years, respectively) underwent transpedicular curettage and drainage. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 29 months (range, 7 to 61 months). The pedicle screws were inserted to the adjacent healthy vertebrae in the usual manner. After insertion of pedicle screws, the drainage pedicle holes were made through pedicles of infected vertebra(e) in order to prevent possible seeding of infective emboli to the healthy vertebra, as the same instruments and utensils are used for both pedicle screws and the drainage holes. A minimum of 15,000 mL of sterilized normal saline was used for continuous irrigation through the pedicular pathways until the drained fluid looked clear. RESULTS: All patients' symptoms and inflammatory markers significantly improved clinically between postoperative 2 weeks and postoperative 3 months, and they were satisfied with their clinical results. Radiologically, all patients reached the spontaneous fusion between infected vertebrae and 3 patients had the screw pulled-out but they were clinically tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that our method of transpedicular curettage and drainage is a useful technique in regards to the treatment of infectious spondylodiscitic patients, who could not tolerate conventional combined anterior and posterior surgery due to multiple co-morbidities, multiple level infectious lesions and poor general condition.
Aged ; Bone Screws ; Curettage/*methods ; Discitis/blood/microbiology/*surgery ; Drainage/*methods ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation/blood ; Lumbar Vertebrae/*surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Tuberculosis, Spinal/blood/microbiology/surgery

We designed this study to analyze the causes of repeat surgery in the low back disorder after primary procedure, to evaluate the risk factors and to suggest the rational approachs can prevent and solve the problems related with repeat surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the medical record and radiographs of 24 patients who had sustained persistent or recurrent pain, failed to extended conservative therapy, showing abnormal myelogram and/or CT scan with nerve root compression, and with segmental instability consistent with patients symptom and sign after the primary procedures. We evaluated the functional outcome according to Kims(1986) criteria. The causes of remained or recurrent pain with neurologic symptom were persistent or aggravated lumbar spinal stenosis in 10 cases(42%), recurrent disc herniation in 4 cases(17%), infection in 3 cases(12%), instability in 2 cases(8%) and others in 5 cases(20%). Satisfactory outcome was recorded in 79%(19/24) of patients. The characteristics of the patients associated with satisfactory outcome were those who operated by recurrent disc herniation, instability, retained disc, metal malposition, and nerve root compression by bone chip. But the characteristics of the patients associated with unsatisfactory outcome were those who operated by infection, lumbar spinal stenosis aggravated by degenerative spondylosis and multiple herniated disc, inadequate decompression of lateral and/or foraminal stenosis in aged patients. The most common lesion site was on L4-5 disc, and unsatisfactory result was expected at the upper lumbar spine involvement. Favorable outcome could be expected in the presence of a pain-free interval more than 1 year from the date of the previous operation or persistent symptoms immediately after the initial operaion. We were expected the risk factors leading to repeat surgery were old aged(more than 60) patients, upper lumbar spine involvement and multiple lumbar disc herniation. Postoperative diskitis or osteomyelitis, pain free interval more than 1 month or less than 1 year, and those who had a revision on the lumbar spine previously could be considered as a poor prognostic indicators. When surgery is indicated for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, adequate diagnostic tests and the execution of appropriate procedures based upon this information should be carried out to prevent the repeat surgery in the low back disorders. Adequate postoperative management can reduce the occurrence of failed back surgery syndrome and in cases necessitating repeat surgery, thorough analysis of causes following proper surgical stabilization can reduce the operative morbidity with early return to daily life.
Constriction, Pathologic ; Decompression ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Discitis ; Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; Medical Records ; Neurologic Manifestations ; Osteomyelitis ; Radiculopathy ; Reoperation* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Spinal Stenosis ; Spine ; Spondylosis ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The effect and safety of anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach were assessed in the single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Seventeen patients from 2007 to 2009 underwent anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach. Postoperative follow-up time was 24-41 months. Data included the patients' general information, microbiology, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, intervertebral fusion rate, and preoperative and final follow-up scores for American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Ten patients had undergone a prior spinal invasive procedure, and 7 had hematogenous infection. The infected segments included L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5 in 1, 2, 5, and 9 cases, respectively. Thirteen bacterial cultures were positive for Staphylococcus aureus (5 cases), Staphylococcus epidermidis (4), Streptococcus (3), and Escherichia coli (1). The operative time was 213.8±45.6 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 180.6±88.1 mL. Postoperative complications consisted of urinary retention (2 cases), constipation (3), and deep vein thrombosis (2). On the final follow-up, VAS scores and ODIs were significantly lower than those of preoperation, while the ASIA grades improved. All the cases achieved good intervertebral bony fusion. Anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach can successfully treat single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis, with less trauma and reliable immobilization. It is a viable option for clinical application.
Adult ; Aged ; Back Pain ; complications ; prevention & control ; Bacterial Infections ; complications ; microbiology ; Constipation ; etiology ; Debridement ; adverse effects ; methods ; Disability Evaluation ; Discitis ; complications ; surgery ; Escherichia coli ; isolation & purification ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; microbiology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Pain Measurement ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion ; adverse effects ; methods ; Staphylococcus aureus ; isolation & purification ; Staphylococcus epidermidis ; isolation & purification ; Streptococcus ; isolation & purification ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Retention ; etiology ; Venous Thrombosis ; etiology