1.Awareness Investigation and Strategy Analysis on Pharmaceutical Services and Fees in Hospitals in Guizhou Province
Dongmei LI ; Qian YANG ; Shuimei SUN ; Ling HE ; Dirong WU ; Mingji LIU ; Pingping CHEN ; Libin WANG ; Zhongyuan WANG ; Hong ZHANG ; Zhu ZHU ; Xue BAI ; Changcheng SHENG ; Jiaxing ZHANG ; Lei LU ; Xue WANG ; Qi CHEN
Herald of Medicine 2024;43(9):1410-1415
Objective To investigate the current status and awareness of pharmaceutical services in hospitals in Guizhou province and to provide a reference for exploring and carrying out pharmaceutical service fees.Methods The questionnaire was designed by the"wjx.cn"website.Three kinds of questionnaires were designed for pharmacists,doctors,nurses,and patients as the research objects,with corresponding differences in some questions,and promoted on WeChat,Dingxiangyuan,and other network platforms.Results A total of 655 questionnaires were collected,and 639 valid questionnaires were recovered,with an effective recovery rate of 97.56%.324 pharmacists(50.70%),82 doctors and nurses(12.83%),233 patients(36.46%)were surveyed.The average approval score of these three groups of respondents on pharmaceutical service fees was 4.67,4.23,and 4.22,respectively(full score:5).Conclusions Overall,pharmacists'professional services have received support from medical staff and patients.However,patients'pharmaceutical service projects currently focus on dispensing services.The recognition of pharmacists'work and the public's awareness of pharmaceutical services can be improved by enhancing the professional ability of pharmacists,strengthening publicity and guidance,and exploring"Internet+pharmaceutical services",etc.,to promote the sustainable development of pharmaceutical services.
2.Study on Pharmacokinetics of Metabolites of Adefovir in Rats after Intragastric Administration of Adefovir Derivatives
Tao XIAO ; Yang YANG ; Tao LI ; Jing LI ; Xiaozhong FU ; Dirong WU ; Yang WANG ; Hong XIAO
China Pharmacy 2019;30(9):1173-1177
OBJECTIVE: To establish a method for the determination of adefovir (PMEA) and study the pharmacokinetics of metabolites PMEA in rats after intragastric administration of PMEA derivatives [PMEA prodrug, adefovir-ursodeoxycholic acid-3-propyl ester, L-leucine-3-propyl ester (PMEA-1c)] in rats. METHODS: HPLC-MS/MS method was adopted. The determination was performed on BEH C18 column with mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid water (gradient elution) at the flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. The column temperature was 30 ℃, and sample size was 1 μL. The quantitative ions were PMEA m/z 274.1→162.1, puerarin (internal standard) m/z 417.1→267.1. 12 rats were randomly divided into adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) group (positive control, 90 mg/kg) and PMEA-1c group (160 mg/kg), with 6 rats in each group. They were given relevant medicine once intragstrically, and the blood samples were collected from tail vein 0.083, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 h after administration to determine the plasma concentration of PMEA. Relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using DAS 2.0 software. RESULTS: The linear range of PMEA was 6.1-440.0 ng/mL (r=0.998 5). RSDs of intra and inter day of precision and stability tests were all less than 10% (n=3, 5, 6), and the accuracy was 82.16%-97.33% (RSD≤6.4%, n=5). Matrix effects ranged from 95.96%-106.35% (RSD≤4.9%, n=5). The pharmacokinetic parameters of PMEA in ADV group and PMEA-1c group were as follows as t1/2 were (1.762±0.117) and (2.548±0.174) h; AUC0-24 h were (2 170.059±146.091) and (4 704.257±176.792) μg·h/L; cmax were (613.092±9.504) and (697.295±15.275) μg/L, respectively. Compared with ADV group, t1/2, AUC0-24 h, AUC0-∞ and cmax of rats in PMEA-1c group were increased significantly (P<0.01 or P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Established method is accurate and reliable. The trial indicates that PMEA-1c metabolism is single compartment model, show that can be used as a potential prodrug for adefovir, which lay a foundation for the further study of adefovir prodrug.