1.Effect of Ondansetron on the Anesthesia of Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section Surgery
Dingwei GUO ; Haiyang FANG ; Yingying CHEN
China Pharmacy 2015;(27):3786-3788
OBJECTIVE:To observe the effect of ondansetron on the anesthesia of cesarean section surgery with spinal-epidur-al anesthesia. METHODS:A total of 60 singletons full-term pregnancy were randomly divided into test group and control group. Test group was given 6% Hetastarch(130/0.4)electrolyte injection 500 ml by intravenous infusion 30 min before anesthesia,and Ondansetreon hydrochloric acid injection 4 ml by intravenous infusion 5 min before anesthesia;control group was given 6% Hetas-tarch(130/0.4)electrolyte injection 500 ml by intravenous infusion 30 min before anesthesia,and 0.9% Sodium chloride injection 4 ml by intravenous infusion 5 min before anesthesia. The clinic data was recorded,including the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate(HR)before anesthesia puncture(T1),after anesthesia maternal left side(T2),after fetal childbirth(T3)and at the end of surgery(T4),Apgar score and incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS:MAP in control group at T2,T3 was obviously low-er than T1 and test group,HR was obviously higher than T1 and test group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);there were no significant differences in the MAP and HR in test group at each time point(P>0.05). Apgar score of newborn after 1 min birth in test group was significantly higher than control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the Apgar score of newborn after 5 min birth between 2 groups(P>0.05). The ADR incidence in test group was significantly lower than control group(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Ondansetron can effectively reduce the inci-dences of vomit vomitting and hypotension in on the cesarean section surgery with spinal-epidural anesthesia,with good safety.
2.Preliminary clinical study of99mTc-labelled small molecules against PSMA for prostate cancer imaging
Silong HU ; Xiaoping XU ; Yao ZHU ; Hengchuan SU ; Dingwei YE ; Zhifeng YAO ; Herong PAN ; Xiaomao GUO ; Yingjian ZHANG
China Oncology 2016;26(7):608-615
Background and purpose:Prostate-speciifc membrane antigen (PSMA), a cell surface protein with high expression in prostate carcinoma (PC) cells, is an attractive target for PC imaging and therapy. Small-molecule radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA can detect the location and extent of disease with high sensitivity and speciifcity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of technetium-99m-labelled small molecule against PSMA (HYNIC-Glu-Urea-A,99mTc-PSMA) for the detection of primary and metastatic prostate cancers.Methods:Twenty-four prostate cancer patients and 1 patient with benign prostate hyperplasia received whole-body scan followed by abdominopelvic SPECT/CT 2 h after intravenous injection of99mTc-PSMA. Tumor to muscle uptake ratio of99mTc-PSMA was calcu-lated using region of interest (ROI) technology. The sensitivity and specificity of99mTc-PSMA were evaluated. The relationships between positive99mTc-PSMA and prostate speciifc antigen (PSA) level and Gleason Score were analyzed. Results:Based on per patient, the sensitivity and speciifcity of99mTc-PSMA were 72.7% (16/22) and 100% (3/3), re-spectively. The level of PSA in patients with positive99mTc-PSMA imaging was signiifcantly higher than that in patients with negative99mTc-PSMA imaging [(PSA median 17.31 ng/mL, range: 2.26-3 239.0 ng/mL)vs(PSA median 0.49 ng/mL, range: 0.07-9.28 ng/mL)] (Z=-3.51,P<0.001). Among newly diagnosed patients and recurrent patients with PSA more than 2.0 nm/mL, it was apparent that99mTc-PSMA imaging was able to detect lesions with improved sensitivity of 94.1% (16/17). Gleason Scores between positive99mTc-PSMA patients and negative99mTc-PSMA patients were not significantly different (Z=-0.69,P=0.52).Conclusion:With the combination of whole-body scan and tomography, 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT can be an excellent and speciifc molecular imaging strategy to detect prostate cancer and its metastases.
3.Application of Metaphase-Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization to the Diagnosis of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and the Detection of Minimal Residual Disease
Ling ZHENG ; Yongquan XUE ; Jianyong LI ; Yu GUO ; Xin XIE ; Yang WANG ; Dingwei LU
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2000;8(3):180-184
To investigate the value of metaphase-fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) in the diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and the detection of its minimal residual disease (MRD), 10 cases of untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (de novo APL 5 cases, relapsed APL 3 cases, AML-M(1) and AML-M(5) one case each) diagnosis by cell morphology at presentation and 10 cases of APL after complete remission (CR) were studied by M-FISH using a whole chromosome 17 painting probe labeled by digoxigenin and the results were compared with that of conventional cytogenetic examination and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Among 10 untreated AML cases, 7 had positive M-FISH results, of whom 4 had t (15;17) translocation, 3 had normal karyotype. Six of them had PML/RARalpha fusion transcript except one, in whom RT-PCR did not be performed; 3 had negative M-FISH results, of whom one had del (2q) x 2 abnormalities, who was RT-PCR-positive for PML/RARalpha fusion transcript; one had complex karyotype abnormalities, whose RT-PCR was negative for PML/RARalpha fusion transcript; one had t (9;22) translocation, whose RT-PCR was negative for PML/RARalpha fusion transcript, but positive for BCR/ABL fusion transcript. Thus the diagnosis of AML-M(3) was revised as AML-M(2) for the latter two cases. 10 APL cases after CR had normal karyotype, but 12/15 M-FISH assays detected 1 - 5 t (15;17) positive cells in 9 of them. This finding is compatible with the results of RT-PCR assays. Leukemia relapse was seen in one case, and two positive M-FISH results were appeared in the 2 assays at a 13 months' interval. This study suggests that M-FISH had important practical value in the diagnosis of APL and the detection of MRD, and that it is less sensitive than RT-PCR, however, it seems to be more potential for prediction of the relapse of leukemia due to its capacity of detecting quantitatively the chromosome translocation in proliferative cells.
4.Dual-color FISH study on myelodysplastic syndrome with 1;7 translocation.
Yongmei SHEN ; Yongquan XUE ; Jianyong LI ; Jinlan PAN ; Yafang WU ; Yu GUO ; Dingwei LU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2002;19(4):313-316
OBJECTIVETo study the myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS) with 1;7 translocation in five cases and to determine further the constitution and origin of centromere of the derivative chromosome resulting from 1;7 translocation.
METHODSBone marrow chromosome preparation of five cases was made using direct method or short- term culture. Karyotypic analysis was carried out by R-banding technique. Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) using Spectrum Red and Spectrum Green directly labeled chromosome 1-specific a-satellite DNA probe(red) and chromosome 7-specific a-satellite DNA probe(green) was performed in three patients of them.
RESULTSAll of the five cases had 1;7 translocation. The centromere of the derivative chromosome 7p/1q was constituted with red and green signals in three of them.
CONCLUSIONThe result of dual-color FISH confirms that the centromere of the derivative chromosome resulting from 1;7 translocation originated from both centromeres of chromosome 1 and chromosome 7.
Adult ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 ; genetics ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7 ; genetics ; Female ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; methods ; Karyotyping ; Male ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; genetics ; Translocation, Genetic
5.Efficacy and safety of LY01005 versus goserelin implant in Chinese patients with prostate cancer: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority trial.
Chengyuan GU ; Zengjun WANG ; Tianxin LIN ; Zhiyu LIU ; Weiqing HAN ; Xuhui ZHANG ; Chao LIANG ; Hao LIU ; Yang YU ; Zhenzhou XU ; Shuang LIU ; Jingen WANG ; Linghua JIA ; Xin YAO ; Wenfeng LIAO ; Cheng FU ; Zhaohui TAN ; Guohua HE ; Guoxi ZHU ; Rui FAN ; Wenzeng YANG ; Xin CHEN ; Zhizhong LIU ; Liqiang ZHONG ; Benkang SHI ; Degang DING ; Shubo CHEN ; Junli WEI ; Xudong YAO ; Ming CHEN ; Zhanpeng LU ; Qun XIE ; Zhiquan HU ; Yinhuai WANG ; Hongqian GUO ; Tiwu FAN ; Zhaozhao LIANG ; Peng CHEN ; Wei WANG ; Tao XU ; Chunsheng LI ; Jinchun XING ; Hong LIAO ; Dalin HE ; Zhibin WU ; Jiandi YU ; Zhongwen FENG ; Mengxiang YANG ; Qifeng DOU ; Quan ZENG ; Yuanwei LI ; Xin GOU ; Guangchen ZHOU ; Xiaofeng WANG ; Rujian ZHU ; Zhonghua ZHANG ; Bo ZHANG ; Wanlong TAN ; Xueling QU ; Hongliang SUN ; Tianyi GAN ; Dingwei YE
Chinese Medical Journal 2023;136(10):1207-1215
BACKGROUND:
LY01005 (Goserelin acetate sustained-release microsphere injection) is a modified gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist injected monthly. This phase III trial study aimed to evaluated the efficacy and safety of LY01005 in Chinese patients with prostate cancer.
METHODS:
We conducted a randomized controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial across 49 sites in China. This study included 290 patients with prostate cancer who received either LY01005 or goserelin implants every 28 days for three injections. The primary efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients with testosterone suppression ≤50 ng/dL at day 29 and the cumulative probability of testosterone ≤50 ng/dL from day 29 to 85. Non-inferiority was prespecified at a margin of -10%. Secondary endpoints included significant castration (≤20 ng/dL), testosterone surge within 72 h following repeated dosing, and changes in luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and prostate specific antigen levels.
RESULTS:
On day 29, in the LY01005 and goserelin implant groups, testosterone concentrations fell below medical-castration levels in 99.3% (142/143) and 100% (140/140) of patients, respectively, with a difference of -0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.9% to 2.0%) between the two groups. The cumulative probabilities of maintaining castration from days 29 to 85 were 99.3% and 97.8%, respectively, with a between-group difference of 1.5% (95% CI, -1.3% to 4.4%). Both results met the criterion for non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints were similar between groups. Both treatments were well-tolerated. LY01005 was associated with fewer injection-site reactions than the goserelin implant (0% vs . 1.4% [2/145]).
CONCLUSION:
LY01005 is as effective as goserelin implants in reducing testosterone to castration levels, with a similar safety profile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04563936.
Humans
;
Male
;
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use*
;
East Asian People
;
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists*
;
Goserelin/therapeutic use*
;
Prostate-Specific Antigen
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Testosterone