1.Epidemiological study on the association of periodontitis with metabolic syndrome in adult Uygur rural residents of Moyu county
Xiaohong SANG ; Li ZHANG ; Jian LIU ; Pengfei BA ; Zhaozhong LIANG ; Mulati DILI ; Wenli WANG
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2010;26(9):745-748
Objective To investigate the association of prevalence of periodontitis with metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods Data were analyzed from 1 650 Uygur rural residents in Moyu County. The subjects, aged over 18 years, were sampled randomly from 15 villages out of total 364 villages. Questionnaire, oral examination, and blood biochemical indicators were collected. The subjects were divided into groups with and without periodontitis based on chronic periodontitis diagnostic criteria, and the group with periodontitis was further divided into subgroups, each with mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis respectively. The diagnosis of MS was madeaccording to the definition of the International Diabetes Federation in 2005. Results Among 1 415 subjects whosedata were complete, there were 275 ( 19.4% ) subjects with MS and 934 (66.0%) subjects with periodontitis. The prevalence of MS was higher in the group with periodontitis than that without perionontitis (23.1% vs 12.3%, x2=23.9, P<0. 001 ). The prevalence of MS was increased with the grade of periodontitis, being 19.8%, 20.8%,27.6% in the mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis groups, respectively(x2= 31.9, P<0. 001 ). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of MS increased with the grade of periodontitis, with OR 1. 6, 1.7,1.9, respectively, in the groups with mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis compared with that without perionontitis ( P<0.05 or P<0.01 ). Conclusions The prevalence of MS was related to periodontitis in the Uygur nationality and increased with the grade of periodontitis.
2.Comparison of effectiveness of stenting for vertebral artery ostium severe stenosis via transradial access and transfemoral access
Canmin ZHU ; Chang CHANG ; Dili WANG ; Rui LI ; Qiangjian JIN ; Ting YANG ; Yang FANG
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine 2022;21(9):879-884
Objective:To analyze the differences of effectiveness of stenting for vertebral artery ostium severe stenosis via transradial access and transfemoral access. Methods:Sixty-three patients with vertebral artery ostium severe stenosis confirmed by cerebral angiography in our hospital from December 2017 to March 2022 were enrolled. Stent implantation via transradial access was performed in 30 patients (radial artery group) and stent implantation via transfemoral access was performed in 33 patients (femoral artery group). The radial artery group was divided into left and right subgroups according to the lesions of vertebral arteries; and according to the anatomical classification of vertebral arteries, radial artery group was divided into two subgroups: anatomical type I and anatomical type II. The baseline data and surgery-related data (success rate of stent implantation, time from sheath insertion to stent implantation, surgical time, exposure time, and incidence of surgical complications) of patients in the radial artery group and femoral artery group were compared and analyzed. The surgical data of patients in the subgroups of radial artery group were compared and analyzed. Results:There was no significant difference in the success rate of stent implantation or incidence of primary endpoint events 3 d after surgery between the radial artery group and femoral artery group ( P>0.05). The time from sheath insertion to stent implantation, surgical time, and exposure time in the radial artery group were statistically shorter than those in the femoral artery group ( P<0.05). The radial artery group had significantly lower incidence of complications (9.01% vs. 30.0%) and incidence of hematoma (3.03% vs. 20.05) at the puncture sites than the femoral artery group ( P<0.05). Time from sheath insertion to stent implantation, surgical time, and exposure time in the anatomical type I patients of radial artery group were significantly longer than those in the anatomical type II patients ( P<0.05); those in patients with left lesions of radial artery group were significantly shorter than those in patients with right lesions ( P<0.05). Conclusion:As compared with that via transfemoral access, the stenting via transradial access has almost the same success rate, without significant difference in incidence of perioperative serious complications, and stenting via transradial access has shorter surgical time, lower surgical difficulty, and lower incidence of complications; patients with anatomical type II or left lesions have better efficacy than those with anatomical type I or right lesions.
3.Comparison of effectiveness of stenting for vertebral artery ostium severe stenosis via transradial access and transfemoral access
Canmin ZHU ; Chang CHANG ; Dili WANG ; Rui LI ; Qiangjian JIN ; Ting YANG ; Yang FANG
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine 2022;21(9):879-884
Objective:To analyze the differences of effectiveness of stenting for vertebral artery ostium severe stenosis via transradial access and transfemoral access. Methods:Sixty-three patients with vertebral artery ostium severe stenosis confirmed by cerebral angiography in our hospital from December 2017 to March 2022 were enrolled. Stent implantation via transradial access was performed in 30 patients (radial artery group) and stent implantation via transfemoral access was performed in 33 patients (femoral artery group). The radial artery group was divided into left and right subgroups according to the lesions of vertebral arteries; and according to the anatomical classification of vertebral arteries, radial artery group was divided into two subgroups: anatomical type I and anatomical type II. The baseline data and surgery-related data (success rate of stent implantation, time from sheath insertion to stent implantation, surgical time, exposure time, and incidence of surgical complications) of patients in the radial artery group and femoral artery group were compared and analyzed. The surgical data of patients in the subgroups of radial artery group were compared and analyzed. Results:There was no significant difference in the success rate of stent implantation or incidence of primary endpoint events 3 d after surgery between the radial artery group and femoral artery group ( P>0.05). The time from sheath insertion to stent implantation, surgical time, and exposure time in the radial artery group were statistically shorter than those in the femoral artery group ( P<0.05). The radial artery group had significantly lower incidence of complications (9.01% vs. 30.0%) and incidence of hematoma (3.03% vs. 20.05) at the puncture sites than the femoral artery group ( P<0.05). Time from sheath insertion to stent implantation, surgical time, and exposure time in the anatomical type I patients of radial artery group were significantly longer than those in the anatomical type II patients ( P<0.05); those in patients with left lesions of radial artery group were significantly shorter than those in patients with right lesions ( P<0.05). Conclusion:As compared with that via transfemoral access, the stenting via transradial access has almost the same success rate, without significant difference in incidence of perioperative serious complications, and stenting via transradial access has shorter surgical time, lower surgical difficulty, and lower incidence of complications; patients with anatomical type II or left lesions have better efficacy than those with anatomical type I or right lesions.