BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol is known to prevent the gastrointestinal complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Rebamipide is known to increase the mucosal generation of prostaglandins and to eliminate free oxygen radicals, thus enhancing the protective function of the gastric mucosa. However, it is unknown whether rebamipide plays a role in preventing NSAID-induced gastropathy. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of rebamipide compared to misoprostol in preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications in patients requiring continuous NSAID treatment. METHODS: We studied 479 patients who required continuous NSAID treatment. The patients were randomly assigned to groups that received 100 mg of rebamipide three times per day or 200 microg of misoprostol three times per day for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint of the analysis was the occurrence rate of gastric ulcers, as determined by endoscopy after 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Of the 479 patients in the study, 242 received rebamipide, and 237 received misoprostol. Ultimately, 44 patients (18.6%) withdrew from the misoprostol group and 25 patients (10.3%) withdrew from the rebamipide group. There was a significant difference in withdrawal rate between the two groups (p=0.0103). The per protocol analysis set was not valid because of the dropout rate of the misoprostol group; thus, the intention to treat (ITT) analysis set is the main set for the efficacy analysis in this study. After 12 weeks, the occurrence rate of gastric ulcers was similar in the rebamipide and misoprostol groups (20.3% vs 21.9%, p=0.6497) according to ITT analysis. In addition, the therapeutic failure rate was similar in the rebamipide and misoprostol groups (13.6% vs 13.1%, p=0.8580). The total severity score of the gastrointestinal symptoms was significantly lower in the rebamipide group than in the misoprostol group (p=0.0002). The amount of antacid used was significantly lower in the rebamipide group than in the misoprostol group (p=0.0258). CONCLUSIONS: Rebamipide can prevent gastric ulcers when used with NSAIDs and can decrease the gastrointestinal symptoms associated with NSAID administration. When the possibility of poor compliance and the potential adverse effects of misoprostol are considered, rebamipide appears to be a clinically effective and safe alternative.
Adult ; Aged ; Alanine/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/*adverse effects ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Arthritis/drug therapy ; Butanones/adverse effects ; Diclofenac/adverse effects/analogs & derivatives ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Gastric Mucosa ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Misoprostol/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Quinolones/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Stomach Ulcer/chemically induced/*prevention & control ; Thiazines/adverse effects ; Thiazoles/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Combination therapy w ith ora l udenafil and aceclofenac may reduce the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis by targeting different pathophysiological mechanisms. We investigated whether combining udenafil and aceclofenac reduced the rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in four academic medical centers. Between January 2012 and June 2013, a total of 216 patients who underwent ERCP were analyzed for the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Patients were determined to be at high risk for pancreatitis based on validated patient and procedure-related risk factors. RESULTS: Demographic features, indications for ERCP, and therapeutic procedures were similar in each group. There were no significant differences in the rate (15.8% [17/107] vs. 16.5% [18/109], p = 0.901) and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis between the udenafil/aceclofenac and placebo groups. One patient in each group developed severe pancreatitis. Multivariate analyses indicated that suspected dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation without sphincterotomy were associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with udenafil and aceclofenac is not effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Acute Disease ; Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/*adverse effects ; Diclofenac/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pancreatitis/diagnosis/etiology/*prevention & control ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Pyrimidines/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Factors ; Sulfonamides/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult