Dialysis dementia

PURPOSE:In many countries, patients and dialysis unit physicians attempt to address issues regarding withholding and withdrawing dialysis through advance directives and clinical guidelines for dialysis utilization. However, there are only a few reports of withholding and withdrawing dialysis in Korea. This study was developed to investigate the attitudes of dialysis unit physicians regarding withholding and withdrawing dialysis in Korea. METHODS:A questionnaire survey was conducted among 45 dialysis unit physicians from January, 2006 to January, 2008. Physicians were asked about their decision making process to withhold and withdraw dialysis, and their opinions regarding the necessities of advance directives and guidelines for withholding and withdrawing dialysis. RESULTS:Analysis of surveys revealed that physicians agreed more about whether to withhold and withdraw dialysis in vegetative patients compared to patients with dementia ( p<0.001, p<0.001). There were more agreements about whether to withhold dialysis than whether to withdraw dialysis in patients with unimpaired cognition ( p<0.037). However, there were no differences in agreements between withholding and withdrawing dialysis in patients with severe neurological impairments. There appeared to be a general consensus regarding the need for guidelines addressing withholding and withdrawing dialysis (84.4%). However, opinions supporting the necessity for advance directives were not strongly favored (33.3%). CONCLUSION:Conflicting opinions are present among dialysis unit physicians regarding whether to withhold and withdraw dialysis according to a patient's neurological impairments. However, most dialysis unit physicians were of one accord regarding the need of guidelines for withholding and withdrawing dialysis.
Advance Directives ; Cognition ; Consensus ; Decision Making ; Dementia ; Dialysis ; Humans ; Korea

PURPOSE:In many countries, patients and dialysis unit physicians attempt to address issues regarding withholding and withdrawing dialysis through advance directives and clinical guidelines for dialysis utilization. However, there are only a few reports of withholding and withdrawing dialysis in Korea. This study was developed to investigate the attitudes of dialysis unit physicians regarding withholding and withdrawing dialysis in Korea. METHODS:A questionnaire survey was conducted among 45 dialysis unit physicians from January, 2006 to January, 2008. Physicians were asked about their decision making process to withhold and withdraw dialysis, and their opinions regarding the necessities of advance directives and guidelines for withholding and withdrawing dialysis. RESULTS:Analysis of surveys revealed that physicians agreed more about whether to withhold and withdraw dialysis in vegetative patients compared to patients with dementia ( p<0.001, p<0.001). There were more agreements about whether to withhold dialysis than whether to withdraw dialysis in patients with unimpaired cognition ( p<0.037). However, there were no differences in agreements between withholding and withdrawing dialysis in patients with severe neurological impairments. There appeared to be a general consensus regarding the need for guidelines addressing withholding and withdrawing dialysis (84.4%). However, opinions supporting the necessity for advance directives were not strongly favored (33.3%). CONCLUSION:Conflicting opinions are present among dialysis unit physicians regarding whether to withhold and withdraw dialysis according to a patient's neurological impairments. However, most dialysis unit physicians were of one accord regarding the need of guidelines for withholding and withdrawing dialysis.
Advance Directives ; Cognition ; Consensus ; Decision Making ; Dementia ; Dialysis ; Humans ; Korea

PURPOSE: Whereas sexual function has long been assumed to be an important component of adult men's lives, the impact of sexual dysfunction has not been estimated in parallel to other modern disease entities. We compared the seriousness of erectile dysfunction (ED) with that of other diseases by use of self-administered questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and July 2012, 434 healthy male volunteers (group 1) and 263 ED patients (group 2) were enrolled. The questionnaire consisted of the following: "If you must undergo only one disease in all your life, which disease could you select among these items or ED?" The comparative disease entities included hypertension, diabetes mellitus (oral hypoglycemic agent/insulin injection), hemodialysis, myocardial infarction, herpes zoster, chronic sinusitis, chronic otitis media, gastric cancer (early/late), lung cancer (early/late), liver cancer (early/late), and dementia. RESULTS: Group 1 recognized ED as being a more serious disease than hypertension, diabetes mellitus (oral hypoglycemic agent), herpes zoster, chronic sinusitis, and chronic otitis media. In comparison, group 2 recognized ED as being a more serious condition than diabetes mellitus (insulin injection) and dementia (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). In particular, ED was deemed to be more serious than hemodialysis, gastric cancer (early), lung cancer (early), and liver cancer (early) by men in group 2 in their 30s to 40s, and these results were statistically significant compared with the same age subgroups in group 1 (p<0.001, p<0.007, p<0.02, and p<0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with their healthy counterparts, Korean men with ED recognized ED as being as serious as hemodialysis, dementia, and early stage cancer, which reflects the severe bother of ED in Korean patients.
Adult ; Dementia ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Herpes Zoster ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Liver Neoplasms ; Lung Neoplasms ; Male ; Myocardial Infarction ; Otitis Media ; Quality of Life ; Renal Dialysis ; Sinusitis ; Stomach Neoplasms