1.Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema--a case report.
Changguan WANG ; Bradley J KATZ ; Matthew J TURNER ; Jianbin HU ; Kang ZHANG
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2006;35(2):112-114
INTRODUCTIONAlthough laser photocoagulation is the primary treatment for diabetic macular oedema, treatment of eyes with diffuse macular oedema has been disappointing. Intravitreal injection of steroids is being investigated for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema. Preliminary results indicate that steroid injections do improve macular oedema, but it is not clear if they improve visual acuity.
CLINICAL PICTURE, TREATMENT, AND OUTCOMEIn this report, we describe a patient with a form of diffuse diabetic macular oedema that responded favourably to intravitreal steroid injections, with improvements in both foveal thickness and visual acuity.
CONCLUSIONIntravitreal steroids can be useful for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema.
Adult ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Glucocorticoids ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections, Intralesional ; Macular Edema ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Male ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Triamcinolone Acetonide ; administration & dosage ; Visual Acuity ; drug effects
2.Efficacy of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Eyes with Postvitrectomy Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage.
Sun Young LEE ; Hee Gyung LEE ; Hyewon CHUNG ; Young Hee YOON ; June Gone KIM
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;21(4):208-212
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) for the management of postvitrectomy diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of patients with postvitrectomy diabetic vitreous hemorrhage who were administered 4 mg (0.1 cc) of triamcinolone acetonide ophthalmic suspension. Ocular history, adverse events, BCVA, intraocular pressure, external eye examination, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination, B-scan ultrasonography, and fundus photography were assessed on day 1, weeks 1, 2, and 4 and months 2 and 3. RESULTS: There were 19 eyes of 18 consecutive patients with mean follow-up after IVT injection of 28 weeks. Of the 19 eyes, 17 eyes (89%) experienced clearing of vitreous hemorrhage within 1 to 5 weeks (mean, 1.7 weeks) with visible triamcinolone precipitates along with blood clot in the inferior aspect of fundus. Of these 17 eyes, 12 eyes (63%) maintained vitreous hemorrhage-free condition at last follow-up with a mean visual acuity of 20/63 (range, 20/320 20/25), whereas 5 (29%) developed recurrent vitreous hemorrhage after clearing of vitreous hemorrhage. Vitreous hemorrhage was not cleared in 2 eyes, which required surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: IVT injection may be beneficial for clearing recurrent postvitrectomy Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/*complications/diagnosis
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage
;
Humans
;
Injections
;
Male
;
Microscopy, Acoustic
;
Middle Aged
;
Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnosis/*drug therapy/etiology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage
;
Visual Acuity
;
Vitrectomy/*adverse effects
;
Vitreous Body
;
Vitreous Hemorrhage/diagnosis/*drug therapy/etiology
3.Major changes and improvements of dialysis therapy in Korea: review of end-stage renal disease registry.
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2015;30(1):17-22
The Korean Society of Nephrology (KSN) launched a nationwide end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient registry in 1985 called the Insan Prof. Byung-Suk Min Memorial ESRD Patient Registry. KSN members voluntarily participate in this registry, which has been collecting data through the Internet since 2000. The KSN ESRD patient registry data were reviewed to elucidate the major changes and improvements in dialysis therapy in Korea. The data review revealed: a rapid increase in the number of patients with ESRD; an increase in the number of patients with diabetic nephropathy; a decrease in the proportion of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis; an increase in the role of private dialysis clinics; an increase in the number of elderly patients undergoing dialysis and the number of patients undergoing long-term dialysis; a decrease in mean blood pressure and an increase in pulse pressure; improvement in anemia treatment; improvement in dialysis adequacy; and improvement in the survival of patients undergoing dialysis. In conclusion, improvements have been made in blood pressure control, anemia treatment, and dialysis adequacy despite increases in the number of elderly patients, diabetic patients, and patients on long-term dialysis during the last two decades in Korea.
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy
;
Humans
;
Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy
;
Peritoneal Dialysis/trends
;
Private Sector/trends
;
Quality Improvement/trends
;
Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends
;
Registries
;
Renal Dialysis/adverse effects/mortality/standards/*trends
;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology
;
Risk Factors
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
4.Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Soo Jeong LEE ; Ei Tae KIM ; Yeon Sung MOON
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;25(5):299-304
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography. METHODS: The present study included 90 eyes with bevacizumab injection and 38 eyes with combination treatment. Using chart records, patients were reviewed until 6 months after treatment. The present study compared changes of visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness at each follow up. DME was classified into 4 types and the morphologic pattern was compared. RESULTS: In patients with the bevacizumab injection only, VA improved from 0.29 +/- 0.18 to 0.48 +/- 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.32 +/- 0.20 at 6 months after treatment. In the combination treatment, VA improved from 0.32 +/- 0.22 to 0.52 +/- 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.36 +/- 0.18 at 6 months after treatment. There was no significant improvement of VA at the final follow-up with either treatment. There was significant decrease of macular thickness except in the mixed DME type. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment did not yield better VA or macular thickness reduction at 6 months than bevacizumab injection alone. By classifying and observing the change of DME type, determining the treatment objectively and predicting the effectiveness of treatment can be helpful.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage
;
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/*complications/diagnosis/therapy
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Fundus Oculi
;
Humans
;
Intravitreal Injections
;
Laser Coagulation/*methods
;
Macular Edema/diagnosis/etiology/*therapy
;
Male
;
Microscopy, Acoustic
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tomography, Optical Coherence
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
;
Visual Acuity
5.Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Soo Jeong LEE ; Ei Tae KIM ; Yeon Sung MOON
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;25(5):299-304
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography. METHODS: The present study included 90 eyes with bevacizumab injection and 38 eyes with combination treatment. Using chart records, patients were reviewed until 6 months after treatment. The present study compared changes of visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness at each follow up. DME was classified into 4 types and the morphologic pattern was compared. RESULTS: In patients with the bevacizumab injection only, VA improved from 0.29 +/- 0.18 to 0.48 +/- 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.32 +/- 0.20 at 6 months after treatment. In the combination treatment, VA improved from 0.32 +/- 0.22 to 0.52 +/- 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.36 +/- 0.18 at 6 months after treatment. There was no significant improvement of VA at the final follow-up with either treatment. There was significant decrease of macular thickness except in the mixed DME type. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment did not yield better VA or macular thickness reduction at 6 months than bevacizumab injection alone. By classifying and observing the change of DME type, determining the treatment objectively and predicting the effectiveness of treatment can be helpful.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage
;
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*administration & dosage
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/*complications/diagnosis/therapy
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Fundus Oculi
;
Humans
;
Intravitreal Injections
;
Laser Coagulation/*methods
;
Macular Edema/diagnosis/etiology/*therapy
;
Male
;
Microscopy, Acoustic
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tomography, Optical Coherence
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
;
Visual Acuity
6.Effects of an Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection Combined With Panretinal Photocoagulation on High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Yong Woon SHIN ; Yoon Jung LEE ; Byung Rho LEE ; Hee Yoon CHO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;23(4):266-272
PURPOSE: To investigate the short-term effects of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) combined with an intravitreal injection of Avastin(R) (bevacizumab) as an adjuvant to high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: The data was collected retrospectively from the eyes of high-risk PDR patients, which were divided into two groups. One eye was treated with only PRP (PRP only group) and the fellow eye of same patient was treated with both PRP and intravitreal bevacizumab injection (Adjuvant group). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP (intraocular pressure), and new vessel (NV) size in fluorescein angiography were recorded immediately and at the six-week follow-up visit. Adverse events associated with intravitreal injection were investigated. RESULTS: Of 12 patients with high-risk PDR, five were male and seven were female. There were no statistically significant BCVA or IOP changes after treatment in either group (p=0.916, 0.888). The reduction of NV size was found in both groups, but NV size in the adjuvant group showed a greater decrease than that of the PRP only group (p=0.038). Three patients had adverse events after intravitreal injection. Two patients had mild anterior uveitis and one patient had a serious complication of branched retinal artery obstruction (BRAO). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection with PRP resulted in marked regression of neovascularization compared with PRP alone. One serious side effect, BRAO, was noted in this study. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of repeated intravitreal bevacizumab injections and the proper number of bevacizumab injections as an adjuvant.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage
;
Antibodies, Monoclonal/*administration & dosage
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis/*therapy
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Fundus Oculi
;
Humans
;
Injections
;
Laser Coagulation/*methods
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
;
Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative/diagnosis/*therapy
;
Vitreous Body
7.Cost-Utility Analysis of Screening Strategies for Diabetic Retinopathy in Korea.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(12):1723-1732
This study involved a cost-utility analysis of early diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy depending on the screening strategy used. The four screening strategies evaluated were no screening, opportunistic examination, systematic fundus photography, and systematic examination by an ophthalmologists. Each strategy was evaluated in 10,000 adults aged 40 yr with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (hypothetical cohort). The cost of each strategy was estimated in the perspective of both payer and health care system. The utility was estimated using quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for the different screening strategies was analyzed. After exclusion of the weakly dominating opportunistic strategy, the ICER of systematic photography was 57,716,867 and that of systematic examination by ophthalmologists was 419,989,046 from the perspective of the healthcare system. According to the results, the systematic strategy is preferable to the opportunistic strategy from the perspective of both a payer and a healthcare system. Although systematic examination by ophthalmologists may have higher utility than systematic photography, it is associated with higher cost. The systematic photography is the best strategy in terms of cost-utility. However systematic examination by ophthalmologists can also be a suitable policy alternative, if the incremental cost is socially acceptable.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
*Cost-Benefit Analysis
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/*diagnosis/economics/*therapy
;
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/economics
;
Early Diagnosis
;
Female
;
Fluorescein Angiography/economics
;
Health Care Costs
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Markov Chains
;
Mass Screening/*economics/methods/statistics & numerical data
;
Middle Aged
;
Models, Economic
;
National Health Programs/economics
;
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
;
Republic of Korea
8.Dose Dependent Effects of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide on Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema.
Joon Sung BAE ; Sung Joon PARK ; I Rum HAM ; Tae Gon LEE
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;23(2):80-85
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 44 eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema were treated with an intravitreal injection of 4 mg (n=12 eyes), 8 mg (n=17) or 25 mg (n=15) of triamcinolone acetonide (TA). Optical coherence tomography, best-corrected logMAR visual acuity and Goldmann tonometry were performed at baseline, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. Mean follow-up was 9.8 months (standard deviation=2.3) with a range of 5-12 months. RESULTS: The duration of intravitreal TA effects on macular thickness and visual acuity increased with increasing dosage. An observed increase in intraocular pressure induced by TA was not significantly associated with dosage. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema who receive intravitreal TA, effects may last longer after a dosage of 25 mg, than after lower doses of 8 mg or 4 mg.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Diabetic Retinopathy/*complications/drug therapy/pathology
;
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage
;
Humans
;
Injections
;
Intraocular Pressure
;
Macular Edema/diagnosis/*drug therapy/etiology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Time Factors
;
Tomography, Optical Coherence
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage
;
Visual Acuity
;
Vitreous Body