No abstract available.
Dexamethasone*

No abstract available.
Dexamethasone*

No abstract available.
Dexamethasone* ; Prognosis*

No abstract available.
Brain* ; Depression* ; Dexamethasone*

No abstract available.
Dexamethasone* ; Humans ; Membranes* ; Rupture*

No abstract available.
Anterior Chamber* ; Dexamethasone*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effects of preoperative and postoperative dexamethasone on pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm. METHODS: Forty patients with early gastric neoplasm who were scheduled for ESD were randomized into two groups according to the timing of steroid administration: preoperative ("pre", n=20) and postoperative ("post", n=20) steroid administration. The pre group received 0.15 mg/kg dexamethasone before ESD and placebo after, and the post group received pre-ESD placebo and post-ESD dexamethasone. The present pain intensity (PPI) index and the short-form McGill pain (SF-MP) questionnaire were evaluated. RESULTS: The primary outcome was PPI score at 6 hours after ESD. There was a greater reduction in 6-hour PPI in the pre group than in the post group (2.1±0.8 vs 3.0±1.1, respectively; p=0.006). The immediate PPI was also significantly lower in the pre group than in the post group (1.6±0.6 vs 2.9±0.6, respectively; p<0.001), and the total SF-MP scores were significantly lower in the pre group than in the post group both immediately and at 6 hours after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative administration of dexamethasone may produce a superior analgesic effect in patients who undergo ESD compared with the postoperative administration of dexamethasone.
Dexamethasone* ; Humans ; Stomach Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Dexamethasone* ; Psychotic Disorders*

Objective: To determine the safety of intracamerally injected preservative-free 0.5% moxifloxacin/0.1% dexamethasone fixed-dose combination on the corneal endothelium in a rabbit model and compare it to intracamerally injected preservative-free 0.5% moxifloxacin. Methods: This experimental study included twenty eyes from ten albino rabbits. The eyes were assessed for baseline corneal clarity and anterior chamber (AC) inflammation using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. A specular microscope measured the corneal endothelial cell density (ECC) and corneal thickness (CT). Intracameral injections of 0.1 mL 0.5% moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution were administered to the 10 right eyes (IPFM group) and 0.1 mL of 0.5% moxifloxacin/0.1% dexamethasone fixed-dose preparation were administered to the 10 left eyes (IPFMDex group). In both groups, ECC, CT, corneal clarity, and AC inflammation at Day 1 (one day post-injection) and Day 7 (seven days post-injection) were compared with Day 0 (baseline). The IPFMDex group was also compared with the IPFM group at Days 0, 1, and 7. The endothelial cells of harvested corneas from both groups at Day 1 and 7 were stained with trypan blue and alizarin red, and compared for endothelial cell damage (ECD). Data were analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: In both the IPFM and IPFMDex groups, ECC and CT at Day 1 (IPFM: ECC p=0.07, CT p=0.76; IPFMDex: ECC p=0.41, CT p=0.94) and Day 7 (IPFM: ECC p=0.95, CT p=0.28; IPFMDex: ECC p=0.29, CT p=0.34) were not different from Day 0 (baseline). No significant difference in ECC, CT, and ECD were found between the IPFM and IPFMDex groups at Day 1 (ECC p=0.82, CT p=0.36, ECD p=0.96) and Day 7 (ECC p=0.95, CT p=0.22, ECD p=0.61). Throughout the study, the cornea in both groups were clear and showed no signs of AC inflammation. Conclusion Intracameral injection of preservative-free moxifloxacin/dexamethasone fixed-dose formulation was safe on the rabbit corneal endothelium and was no different from preservative-free moxifloxacin.
Moxifloxacin ; Dexamethasone ; Endothelium, Corneal

Background: Dexamethasone, an anti-inflammatory drug, has an assumed analgesic effect when given epidurally, with less side effects5,7. Although numerous studies have evaluated dexamethasone, there is a paucity of studies assessing its intrapartum use. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of epidural dexamethasone when used as an adjuvant for labor analgesia. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis guided by the Cochrane handbook was performed. Articles were searched through PubMed, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov using search strategies such as keywords and MeSH terms. Cochrane version 2 risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to assess for quality. Quantitative data were pooled and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1. Results: A total of five trials involving 309 women in labor were analyzed. The pooled mean difference showed prolonged duration of epidural analgesia on patients who received epidural dexamethasone; pooled risk ratio between the experimental and control group demonstrated no significant maternal adverse events such as nausea and vomiting, shivering, hypotension, and fever. Pooled risk ratio and mean difference also showed that epidural dexamethasone had no significant effect on the neonatal APGAR and neonatal umbilical pH. Conclusion Present data demonstrated the potential role of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to epidural solution during labor analgesia on providing local anesthetic dose sparing effect through prolongation of the duration of epidural analgesia, with limited maternal and neonatal adverse events. These results should be interpreted with caution before adopting this technique in routine clinical practice.
Dexamethasone ; Meta-Analysis