Objective To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) scores in determining the surgical approach for T1 stage renal masses.Methods From Jan 2010 to Dec 2012,clinical data of 122 cases (76 males and 46 females),who underwent surgery for T1 stage renal masses,were collected retrospectively.The mean age was 51 years(range 21-81) and mean body mass index was (22.8±3.9) kg/m2.Sixty-three tumors were found in left kidney and 59 in right kidney.Among them,78 patients were diagnosed as T1a stage and 44 patients were T1b stage.In patients with T1a stage,56 received nephron sparing surgery (NSS) and 22 received radical nephrectomy (RN).In patients with T1b stage,21 received NSS and 23 received RN.The PADUA nephrometry score was analyzed to evaluate their relationships to surgical type and the approach of NSS.Results According to the PADUA nephrometry score,the number of low risk,middle risk and high risk patients were 24,62,26,respectively.Inlow risk group,middle risk group and high risk group,the proportion of RN and NSS was 8.3％/ 91.7％,30.6％/69.4％,66.7％/33.3％.In 77 patients received NSS,the unmber of laparoscopic NSS and open NSS was 18 ∶ 4,25 ∶ 18,2 ∶ 10,respectively.The PADUA nephrometry score was significantly associated with the type of surgery (x2 =23.16,P＜0.01),and the NSS approach (x2 =13.57,P＜0.01).Tumor size (HR =2.79 ; 95％ CI,1.29-6.02 ; P＜ 0.01),percentage of tumor deepening into the kidney (HR =3.82; 95％CI,1.77-8.09; P＜0.01),longitudinal (HR=4.00;95％CI,1.83-8.72; P＜0.01),tumor relationships with renal sinus(HR=103.13; 95％CI,21.85-486.81 ; P＜0.01),tumor relationships with urinary collecting system (HR =15.11 ; 95％ CI,5.95-38.35 ; P＜ 0.01),rim tumor location (HR =3.50 ; 95％ CI,1.61-7.59; P＜0.01) were closely related with surgery approach.The correlation coefficients of relationship with renal sinus was highest (r=0.70).Conclusions The PADUA nephrometry score provides a simple,useful and stable system to character the salient renal anatomy and guide the surgery.Low risk group should consider the NSS as the first line therapy.NSS could also be chosen in the middle risk group.However,the renal anatomy in those patients should be referred.RN should be chosen in high risk group.

OBJECTIVE:To study the preventive effect of Lonicera japonica alcohol extract on mice with liver injury based on metabolomics method. METHODS:30 mice were equally randomized into a normal control (isometric normal saline) group,a model(isometric normal saline)group and a group of L. japonica alcohol extract(2 g/kg). The mice were given drugs by ig once a day for 14 consecutive days. On the 8th day of administration,the models were established by giving 0.2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMN,10 ml/kg)ip once a day for 7 consecutive days. Gas chromatography-mass spectrum(GC-MS)was used to analyze 24 h total ions chromatogram of the urine sample on the 1st,3rd,5th and 7th day of administration of drugs and DMN. The change in endogenic small molecule metabolites in urine was observed. Principal component analysis was employed to explore the change in the metabolite chromatogram and underlying biomarkers in urine. RESULTS:The contour of the chromatogram changed to a largest extent 1 to 5 d after given DMN,but showed an obvious trend towards regression 7 days thereafter. DMN resulted in increase in the contents of 8-phenyl-8-azbicyclo-[4,3,0]non-3-ene-7,9-dione,2-(6-heptynyl)-1,3 dioxolane,bis-(O-methyloxime)-4-ketoglu-cose,and decrease in the contents of malonic acid,2-(4- chlorophenylthiomethoxyl)ethyl,tetrahydro-2-furanacetaldehyde,D-ga-lactose,erythro-pentonic acid and galacturonic acid,in endogenic small molecule metabolites in mouse urine,for which Lonicera japonica alcohol extract can improve that. CONCLUSIONS:Previous administration of L. japonica alcohol extract ig has preven-tive effect to some extent on the physiological and metabolic conditions of mice with liver injury induced by DMN.

Objective To investigate the efficacy of leflunomide combined with prednisone in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).Methods A prospective,multicenter,randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in patients with biopsy-proved proliferative lupus nephritis recruited from 15 renal centers from 2013 to 2015.Patients were randomized to two groups.Oral leflunomide or intravenous cyclophosphamide was given to patients in each group.Both groups received a tapering course of oral prednisone therapy.All patients were followed up for 24 weeks.The blood biochemistry,urine index,clinical curative effect and adverse reaction were recorded and analyzed statistically.Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled in this clinical trial,including 48 patients in leflunomide group and 52 patients in cyclophosphamide group.After 24 weeks,the overall response rate was 79％ (95％ CI 67％-90％) in the leflunomide group and 69％ (95％ CI 56％-82％) in the cyclophosphamide group.23％ (95％CI 11％-35％) of patients in leflunomide group showed complete remission compared with 27％ (95％CI 24％-30％) in cyclophosphamide group (P=0.35).The levels of 24-hr urine protein excretion,SLEDAI and anti-dsDNA antibody titers were decreased in patients treated with leflunomide group after 24-weeks treatment.And the levels of serum albumin and complement 3 after treatment were significantly higher compared with these before treatment.There was also no significant difference in changes of 24-hr urine protein excretion,SLEDAI score,anti-dsDNA antibody titers,serum albumin and complement C3 levels after treatment between two groups.Incidence of adverse events did not differ between the leflunomide and cyclophosphamide group.Conclusions Leflunomide combined with prednisone showed same efficacy compared with cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for lupus nephritis.Leflunomide might be an useful medicine in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the application value of R.E.N. A.L. nephrometry score for surgery type decisions of T1 stage renal tumor.

METHODSClinical data including image data, surgery type and prognosis etc were collected retrospectively for 122 cases from January 2010 to December 2012. There were 76 male and 46 female patients and they were 29-82 years (mean 51 years). The body mass index was (22.8 ± 3.9) kg/m(2). The patients were undergoing surgical excision with renal tumor of T1 stage. The R.E.N. A.L. nephrometry score was analyzed to evaluate their relationships to surgery type (RN or NSS) and the approach of NSS (ONSS or LNSS) using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regressions analysis.

RESULTSAll surgery had been completed. The surgery included RN of 45 patients, LNSS of 45 patients and ONSS of 32 patients. The R.E.N. A.L. nephrometry score was significantly associated with the type of surgery (χ(2) = 27.89, P < 0.05), and the NSS approach (χ(2) = 12.87, P < 0.05). When the scores less than 7 points, it is majorly treated by nephron sparing surgery (92.9%), and when the scores more than 9 points, it is majorly treated by radical nephrectomy (69.4%). Individual component scores were analyzed to evaluate that they were all related to surgery type (χ(2) = 7.00-14.57, P < 0.05), and the individual component N associated the surgery type mostly. Furthermore, individual component R,E,N and L were statistically significant predictors of the NSS approach (χ(2) = 4.92-15.07, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe R.E.N. A.L. nephrometry scoring system provides a simple, useful, and stable system to character the salient renal anatomy of T1 stage, and can provide the best surgery approach.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney ; pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrectomy ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies