Less than one third of patients who suffer from major depressive disorder (MDD) report remission following antidepressant treatments requiring more diverse treatment approaches. Augmentation of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) has been increasingly recognized as an important treatment option. The authors have previously provided a comprehensive review of SGAs for the treatment of MDD in 2013. Since then, numerous additional clinical trials have been conducted to investigate diverse issues regarding the utility of SGAs in MDD. Moreover, a new SGA, brexpiprazole, was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2015 for the treatment of MDD as an augmentation agent to antidepressants. Thus, the aim of this study was to provide a concise update of all the available SGAs for the treatment of MDD, in particular on the additional clinical trials which have been published since 2013.
Antidepressive Agents ; Antipsychotic Agents ; Depressive Disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant ; Humans ; United States Food and Drug Administration

Major depressive disorder is often resistant to antidepressant treatment. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Known adverse events of rTMS include transient headache, local pain, syncope, seizure induction, and hypomania induction. This report outlines a patient with TRD who unexpectedly improved following a seizure during the course of rTMS, which has never been reported.
Depression* ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant ; Headache ; Humans ; Seizures* ; Syncope ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation*

Baclofen is a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist used as an anti-craving agent for treatment of alcohol dependence. It has gained popularity in the recent times because it is well tolerated even in patients with hepatic impairments. Herein we are summarizing the latest literature about baclofen induced hypomania and are reporting a case of baclofen abuse because of its mood elevating property in a patient of alcohol dependence with comorbid major depressive disorder. Literature review and case study of a 36-year-old male with alcohol dependence with comorbid major depressive disorder was prescribed with tablet baclofen as an anti-craving agent along with antidepressant medicines. The patients who did not improve with conventional antidepressant therapy started feeling better in terms of his mood symptoms on taking tablet baclofen. Owing to the mood elevating property he started abusing baclofen. Despite its safety profile in hepatic impairment, one must be very cautious in prescribing baclofen because of its mood altering property which may account for its abuse potentiality.
Adult ; Alcoholism* ; Baclofen* ; Depressive Disorder, Major* ; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant ; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid ; Humans ; Male

OBJECTIVES: In 2002, the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Major depressive Disorder (KMAP-MD) was published, but there has been a need for a guideline about detailed issues of depressive disorder. We revised KMAP-MDD and reestablished Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD) in 2006. METHODS: A questionnaire had been developed by the executive committee for KMAP-DD. The review committee consisted of 101 experienced psychiatrists. From the total of 22 questions in the questionnaire, 7 questions were evaluated for these subjects . We classified the expert opinions to 3 categories according to its confidence interval; first, second and third line. RESULTS: SSRI and venlafaxine were the first line antidepressants (AD) for atypical and melancholic depression. For dysthymic disorder and minor depressive disorder, SSRI was recommended as the first line medications. Only AD medications was a preferred initial strategy for treating premenstrual dysphoric disorder, mild to moderate and severe non-psychotic postpartum depression. In severe psychotic postpartum depression, combination therapy of AD and atypical antipsychotics was the treatment of choice. SSRI was preferred when considering sedation, anticholinergic and cardiovascular adverse effects. Also, experts recommended mirtazapine against gastrointestinal adverse effects and bupropion in avoiding sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinicians have to consider both clinical situations and drug adverse effects in the choice of antidepressant medications.
Advisory Committees ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antipsychotic Agents ; Bupropion ; Depression* ; Depression, Postpartum ; Depressive Disorder* ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Dysthymic Disorder ; Expert Testimony ; Female ; Humans ; Psychiatry ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major public health problem. It is estimated that about 30% of patients with major depressive disorder do not show substantial clinical improvement to somatic or psychosocial treatment. Most of studies for TRD have focused on the subjects already known as TRD. Patients with unipolar depressive episodes that do not respond satisfactorily to numerous sequential treatment regimens were included in the TRD studies. Such post hoc experimental design can be regarded only as consequences of having TRD, rather than as causal risk factors for it. Although informative, data derived from such studies often do not allow a distinction to be made between cause and effect. So, we should shift paradigm toward examining the risk for developing TRD in untreated depressed patients. To deal with this problem, untreated depressed patients should be enrolled in the study to identify biological markers for treatment resistance. The peripheral or central biological markers should be explored before starting treatment. Subsequent systematic administration of treatments with appropriate monitoring in the subjects can determine the risk for developing treatment resistance in untreated individuals. Such information could give a cue to improve the initial diagnosis and provide more effective treatment for TRD.
Biomarkers ; Cues ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant* ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Neuroimaging ; Public Health ; Research Design ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Dysthymic Disorder (DD) in a sample of Italian children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to explore specific features of comorbid depressive disorders in ADHD. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-six consecutive, drug-naive Caucasian Italian outpatients with ADHD were recruited and comorbid disorders were evaluated using DSM-IV-TR criteria. To evaluate ADHD severity, parents of all children filled out the ADHD Rating Scale. Thirty-seven children with comorbid MDD or DD were compared with 118 children with comorbid conduct disorder and 122 without comorbidity for age, sex, IQ level, family psychiatric history, and ADHD subtypes and severity. RESULTS: 42 of the ADHD children displayed comorbid depressive disorders: 16 exhibited MDD, 21 DD, and 5 both MDD and DD. The frequency of hyperactive-impulsive subtypes was significantly lower in ADHD children with depressive disorders, than in those without any comorbidity. ADHD children with depressive disorders showed a higher number of familial psychiatric disorders and higher score in the Inattentive scale of the ADHD Rating Scale, than children without any comorbidity. No differences were found for age, sex and IQ level between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous studies in other countries, depressive disorders affect a significant proportion of ADHD children in Italy. Patient assessment and subsequent treatment should take into consideration the possible presence of this comorbidity, which could specifically increase the severity of ADHD attention problems.
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity ; Child ; Comorbidity ; Conduct Disorder ; Depressive Disorder* ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Dysthymic Disorder ; Humans ; Italy ; Outpatients ; Parents

OBJECTIVE: In 2002, the Korean Society for Affective Disorders developed the guidelines for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), and revised it in 2006 and 2012. The third revision of these guidelines was undertaken to reflect advances in the field. METHODS: Using a 44-item questionnaire, an expert consensus was obtained on pharmacological treatment strategies for MDD 1) without or 2) with psychotic features, 3) depression subtypes, 4) maintenance, 5) special populations, 6) the choice of an antidepressant (AD) regarding safety and adverse effects, and 7) non-pharmacological biological therapies. Recommended first, second, and third-line strategies were derived statistically. RESULTS: AD monotherapy is recommended as the first-line strategy for non-psychotic depression in adults, children/adolescents, elderly adults, patient with persistent depressive disorder, and pregnant women or patients with postpartum depression or premenstrual dysphoric disorder. The combination of AD and atypical antipsychotics (AAP) was recommended for psychotic depression in adult, child/adolescent, postpartum depression, and mixed features or anxious distress. Most experts recommended stopping the ongoing initial AD and AAP after a certain period in patients with one or two depressive episodes. As an MDD treatment modality, 92% of experts are considering electroconvulsive therapy and 46.8% are applying it clinically, while 86% of experts are considering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation but only 31.6% are applying it clinically. CONCLUSION: The pharmacological treatment strategy in 2017 is similar to that of Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder 2012. The preference of AAPs was more increased.
Adult ; Aged ; Antipsychotic Agents ; Biological Therapy ; Consensus ; Depression ; Depression, Postpartum ; Depressive Disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Drug Therapy ; Electroconvulsive Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Mood Disorders ; Pregnant Women ; Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we determined the prevalence of bipolarity in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD) by investigating demographic and clinical characteristics, diagnostic subtypes, and illness outcome. METHOD: A medical record review of patients admitted to a university hospital with the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted. DSM-IV diagnoses at index hospitalization and six months after discharge and detailed clinical information were obtained. We categorized subjects into a TRD group or a non-TRD group and re-evaluated the patients using the recently proposed criteria for bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD). Patients in the TRD group were compared with patients in the non-TRD group with regard to the prevalence rate of BSD at the index hospitalization and at the end of the follow up period. RESULTS: There were 281 patients diagnosed as MDD. At discharge, the number of patients who fulfilled the criteria for BSD was higher (p<.001) in the TRD group (32/68, 47.1%) than in the non-TRD group (8/213, 3.8%). At the end of six-month follow-up period, the diagnoses of 38 patients changed ; 18 (26.5%) in the TRD group were subsequently classified as having bipolar disorder, and seven (3.3%) in the non-TRD group (p<0.001). There was no difference between these two groups in other clinical and demographic variables. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that a large number of patients with TRD have a bipolar diathesis.
Bipolar Disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant* ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Disease Susceptibility* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Prevalence

The light therapy has been known to be effective to non-seasonal affective disorder as well as seasonal affective disorder. Although the mechanism of action of light therapy for depressive disorder has not been verified yet, its clinical application revealed similar effects like antidepressants and relatively smaller side effects. However, it is not common to apply the light therapy for treatment resistant depressive disorder. This case report indicates a robust efficacy of light therapy and its clinical usefulness, illustrating the complete remission in a treatment resistant patient with major depressive disorder after bright light therapy.
Antidepressive Agents ; Depressive Disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major* ; Humans ; Mood Disorders ; Phototherapy* ; Seasonal Affective Disorder

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of severity of functional disability, caused by physical illness, on the depressive symptoms and depressive disorders of the elderly patients (above 65 year-old) with physical illness. METHOD: Complete medical and psychiatric evaluations were achieved on 138 patients, except the 12 patients, who were severely cognitively impaired (MMSE-K score;below 19), of the 150 elderly patients (above 65 year-old) with physical illness. Sociodemographic data and health characteristic data were systematically collected, and the severity of functional disability caused by physical illness was evaluated. Depression scales (KGDS, GDS, MADRS) on 138 elderly patients were executed. In addition, based on the 61 patients of the 65 elderly patients (above 65 years old) with physical illness, except 4 patients who were severely cognitively impaired (MMSE-K score;below 19), sociodemographic data and health characteristic data were collected. The clinical diagnosis by DSM-IV diagnostic criteria and KGDS on 61 elderly patients were performed, and their functional disability caused by physical illness was evaluated. RESULTS: The frequency of depressive symptoms showed 50.0%, 36.2%, and 35.5%, respectively in KGDS, GDS, and MADRS. The patients with severe functional disability caused by physical illness-compared with those with mild functional disability-had significantly higher score on the depression scales (KGDS, GDS, MADRS). The correlation between severity of functional disability caused by physical illness and depression scales was highly positive. Severity of functional disability caused by physical illness was the strongest contributor to the depression scales. In the additional study, 19.7% of patients were diagnosed as major depressive disorder, 18% of them as dysthymic disorder, and depressive disorder (major depressive disorder & dysthymic disorder) group-compared with nondepressive disorder group-showed significantly higher score on the FDRPT and KGDS. CONCLUSION: The frequency of depressive symptoms and depressive disorder in elderly patients with physical illness was higher, compared with those in general elderly people. Functional disability caused by physical illness most highly influenced on depressive symptoms. Thus, it is important to discriminate whether the elderly patients with physical illness have depressive symptoms or not. In addition, we assumed that KGDS was not only highly correlated with other depression scales (GDS, MADRS), but also had the high diagnostic power of dis-crimination for depressive symptoms and depressive disorder. This study suggested that KGDS was available in screening depression in the elderly patients with physical illness. It was necessary to study systematically the availability of KGDS in the future.
Aged* ; Depression* ; Depressive Disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Dysthymic Disorder ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Weights and Measures