OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical application value of minimal prepared ceramic veneer in anterior teeth, by analyzing the esthetic effects and success rates.

METHODSForty-four anterior teeth in 30 patients with minor esthetic defect were included in this study. Less than 0.5 mm preparation or no preparaion technique was used in the clinical procedure. Glass ceramics veneers were delivered and 3M Relyx Veneer were used as the adhesive. The final appearance of each restoration was evaluated by patients on visual analogue scales (VAS) and by professional prosthodontists. Evaluation criteria included margin effects, color, shape and translucency. The success rate of all the restoration were analyzed in 6, 12 and 24 month after the treatment.

RESULTSThe patients' degree of satisfaction was 9.2 ± 0.4, while the excellent rate of esthetic effect of margin effect, color, shape and translucency was 89% (39/44), 91% (40/44), 98% (43/44) and 93% (41/44) by professional prosthodontist. The success rate of 6, 12 and 24 month were 100% (44/44), 98% (43/44) and 91% (40/44).

CONCLUSIONSThe minimal prepared venneers have a good esthetic effect and a satisfactory success rate, and is a suitable technique in esthetic treatment under the critical indications.

Ceramics ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; methods ; Dental Veneers ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Incisor ; Patient Satisfaction ; Tooth Abnormalities ; therapy ; Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic ; methods ; Tooth Wear ; therapy

Glassionomer cement used for atraumatic resto rative treatement (ART) is a simple and affordable technique for protection filling cavity in children’s teeth
Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dental Cements

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of ceramic onlay to repair serious defects in young permanent molars. METHODS: Sixty patients with defects in young permanent molars were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group was restored with ceramic onlay, and the other used resin composite to direct filling. Follow-up visit was conducted at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Modified USPHS/Ryge criteria were used to evaluate the effect of restoration. The occlusal courses were recorded by the T-Scan Ⅲ system in intercuspal position. Gingival and food impaction were recorded. The effect of the two restorative methods, the recovery of occlusal function, and the gingival and approximal conditions were analyzed. RESULTS: At 12 months after restoration, the marginal fitness in the onlay group was significantly better than that in the resin group (P<0.05). At 12 and 24 months after restoration, the surface smoothness in the onlay group was significantly better than that in the resin composite group (P<0.05). At each follow-up visit, the resin group had significantly lower per-cen-tage of occlusal force than contralateral molar (P<0.05). The percentage of occlusal force in the onlay group and the con-trala-teral molar showed no statistical difference (P>0.05). The gingival and approximal conditions also demon-strated no stati-stical differences (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The ceramic onlay repair method is better than resin composite filling in marginal fitness, surface smoothness, and recovery of the occlusal function when restoring young permanent molars with serious defects.
Bite Force ; Ceramics ; Composite Resins ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; methods ; Humans ; Inlays ; Molar ; Resin Cements

Composite Resins ; Dental Restoration, Permanent

Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Humans ; Tooth

Color ; Dental Materials ; Dental Restoration, Permanent

Composite Resins ; Dental Cements ; Dental Restoration, Permanent

OBJECTIVETo evaluate clinical effect of composite inlays in the defective molars.

METHODSA total of 200 defective molars from 163 patients were divided into two groups, including 100 molars of each. One group was restored with the direct composite inlays and another group with the traditional composite fillings. All the restorations were evaluated in oral cavity after 6-month and 5-year filling or insertion with United States public health service criterions. The data were analyzed using SPSS 11.0 software with the chi-square test. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTSIn clinical service for 6 months, the successful rate of composite inlays was 91.8% (90/98) and the corresponding figure for traditional composite fillings was 91.8% (89/97), but there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). In clinical service for 5 years, the successful rate of composite inlay was 87.9% (80/91), the corresponding figure for the traditional composite fillings being 67.4% (60/89) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSIn clinical, the defective molars can be well restored with the direct composite inlays. Especially in the long-term clinical service, the composite inlays show significant superiority over the traditional composite fillings.

Adult ; Composite Resins ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Female ; Humans ; Inlays ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tooth Abrasion ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Humans ; Prosthesis Coloring

Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Humans ; Prosthesis Coloring